Skip to main content

Truthful and Competitive Double Auctions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms — ESA 2002 (ESA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2461))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of designing a mechanism for double auctions where bidders each bid to buy or sell one unit of a single commodity. We assume that each bidder’s utility value for the item is private to them and we focus on truthful mechanisms, ones were the bidders’ optimal strategy is to bid their true utility. The profit of the auctioneer is the difference between the total payments from buyers and to tal to the sellers. We aim to maximize this profit. We extend the competitive analysis framework of basic auctions [9] and give an upper bound on the profit of any truthful double auction. We then reduce the competitive double auction problem to basic auctions by showing that any competitive basic auction can be converted into a competitive double auction with a competitive ratio of twice that of the basic auction. In addition, we show that better competitive ratios can be obtained by directly adapting basic auction techniques to the double auction problem. This result provides insight into the design of profit maximizing mechanisms in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Bar-Yossef, K. Hildrum, and F. Wu. Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods. In Proc. 13th Symp. on Discrete Alg. ACM/SIAM, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Blum, T. Sandholm, and M. Zinkevich. Online algorithms for market clearing. In Proc. 13th Symp. on Discrete Alg., pages 971–980, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bulow and J. Roberts. The Simple Economics of Optimal Auctions. The Journal of Political Economy, 97:1060–90, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. H. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 11:17–33, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. DeVries and R. Vohra. Combinatorial Auctions: A survey. Unpublished manuscript, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Fiat, A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, and A. Karlin. Competitive generalized auctions. In Proc. 34rd ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. ACM Press, 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel Friedman and John Rust, editors. The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence. Addison Wesley, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. V. Goldberg and J. D. Hartline. Competitiveness via consensus. Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-73, Microsoft Research, Mountain View, CA., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, A. Karlin, and A. Wright. Competitive Auctions. Submitted to Games and Economic Behavior., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Goldberg, J. D. Hartline, and A. Wright. Competitive Auctions and Digital Goods. In Proc. 12th Symp. on Discrete Alg., pages 735–744. ACM/SIAM, 2001. Also available as InterTrust Technical Report STAR-TR-99.09.01, 1999, http://www.star-lab.com/tr/tr-99-01.html.

  11. T. Groves. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, 41:617–631, 1973.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Klemperer. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. In Journal of Economic Surveys, pages 227–286. 13(3), 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Preston McAfee. A dominant strategy double auction. In Journal of Economic Theory, volume 56, pages 434–450, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Moulin and S. Shenker. Strategyproof Sharing of Submodular Costs. to appear in Economic Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Myerson. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6:58–73, 1981.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Sandholm and S. Suri. Market clearability. In Proc. of the 17th International Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1145–1151, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. J. of Finance, 16:8–37, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Wurman, W. Walsh, and M. Wellman. Flexible double auctions for electronic commerce: Theory and implementation. In Decision Support Systems, volume 24, pages 17–27, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deshmukh, K., Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R. (2002). Truthful and Competitive Double Auctions. In: Möhring, R., Raman, R. (eds) Algorithms — ESA 2002. ESA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2461. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44180-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45749-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics