Abstract
Credit scoring is being used in order to assign credit applicants to good and bad risk classes. This paper investigates the credit scoring performance of support vector machines (SVM) with weighted classes and moderated outputs. First, we consider the adjustment of support vector machines for credit scoring to a set of non standard situations important to practitioners. Such more sophisticated credit scoring systems will adapt to vastly different proportions of credit worthiness between sample and population. Different costs for different types of misclassification will also be handled. Second, sigmoid output mapping is used to derive default probabilities, important for constructing rating systems and a step towards more “personalized” credit contracts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
KWOK, J.T. (1999): Moderating the Outputs of Support Vector Machine Classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10,5, 1018–1031.
LIN, Y. (1999): Support Vector Machines and the Bayes rule in classification. Technical Report 1014, Dept. of Statistics, University of Wisconsin.
LIN, Y., LEE, Y., and WAHBA, G. (2002): Support Vector Machines for Classification in Nonstandard Situations. Machine Learning, 46,1–3, 191–202.
PLATT, J.C. (1999): Probabilistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods. In: A.J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, and C. Schuurmans (Eds.): Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
SCHEBESCH, K.B. and STECKING, R. (2003): Support Vector Machines for Credit Applicants: Detecting Typical and Critical Regions. In: Credit Scoring & Credit Control VIII, Credit Research Center, University of Edinburgh, 3–5 September 2003, 13pp.
SCHÖLKOPF, B. and SMOLA, A. (2002): Learning with Kernels. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
STECKING, R. (2003): Credit Scoring im Baukreditwesen, in H. Schaefer (Ed.): Kredit und Risiko: Basel II und die Konsequenzen für Banken und Mittelstand, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 45–56.
STECKING, R. and SCHEBESCH, K.B. (2003): Support Vector Machines for Credit Scoring: Comparing to and Combining with some Traditional Classification Methods, in: M. Schader, W. Gaul, and M. Vichi (Eds.): Between Data Science and Applied Data Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 604–612.
STEIN, R.M. (2002): Benchmarking Default Prediction Models: Pitfalls and Remedies in Model Validation. Technical Report 020305, Moody’s KMV, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schebesch, K.B., Stecking, R. (2005). Support Vector Machines for Credit Scoring: Extension to Non Standard Cases. In: Baier, D., Wernecke, KD. (eds) Innovations in Classification, Data Science, and Information Systems. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26981-9_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26981-9_57
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23221-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26981-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)