Skip to main content

Quantifying Similarities Between Timed Systems

  • Conference paper
Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems (FORMATS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3829))

Abstract

We define quantitative similarity functions between timed transition systems that measure the degree of closeness of two systems as a real, in contrast to the traditional boolean yes/no approach to timed simulation and language inclusion. Two systems are close if for each timed trace of one system, there exists a corresponding timed trace in the other system with the same sequence of events and closely corresponding event timings. We show that timed CTL is robust with respect to our quantitative version of bisimilarity, in particular, if a system satisfies a formula, then every close system satisfies a close formula. We also define a discounted version of CTL over timed systems, which assigns to every CTL formula a real value that is obtained by discounting real time. We prove the robustness of discounted CTL by establishing that close states in the bisimilarity metric have close values for all discounted CTL formulas.

This research was supported in part by the AFOSR MURI grant F49620-00-1-0327 and the NSF grants CCR-0208875, CCR-0225610, and CCR-0427202.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Dill, D.L.: Model checking in dense real time. Inf. and Comp. 104, 2–34 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Dill, D.L.: A theory of timed automata. Theor. Comput. Sci. 126, 183–235 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur, R., La Torre, S., Madhusudan, P.: Perturbed timed automata. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 70–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouyer, P., Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G.: Staying alive as cheaply as possible. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 203–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Caspi, P., Benveniste, A.: Toward an approximation theory for computerised control. In: Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., Sifakis, J. (eds.) EMSOFT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2491, pp. 294–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerans, K.: Decidability of bisimulation equivalences for parallel timer processes. In: Probst, D.K., von Bochmann, G. (eds.) CAV 1992. LNCS, vol. 663, pp. 302–315. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P.: Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 8, 244–263 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Comon, H., Jurski, Y.: Timed automata and the theory of real numbers. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Mauw, S. (eds.) CONCUR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1664, pp. 242–257. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Courcoubetis, C., Yannakakis, M.: Minimum and maximum delay problems in real-time systems. Formal Methods in System Design 1, 385–415 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: Model checking discounted temporal properties. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Stoelinga, M.: Linear and branching metrics for quantitative transition systems. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R.: Discounting the future in systems theory. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 1022–1037. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. De Wulf, M., Doyen, L., Markey, N., Raskin, J.-F.: Robustness and implementability of timed automata. In: Lakhnech, Y., Yovine, S. (eds.) FORMATS 2004 and FTRTFT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3253, pp. 118–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Desharnais, J., Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., Panangaden, P.: Metrics for labeled Markov processes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 318, 323–354 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Fränzle, M.: Analysis of hybrid systems: An ounce of realism can save an infinity of states. In: Flum, J., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M. (eds.) CSL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1683, pp. 126–140. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta, V., Henzinger, T.A., Jagadeesan, R.: Robust timed automata. In: Maler, O. (ed.) HART 1997. LNCS, vol. 1201, pp. 331–345. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta, V., Jagadeesan, R., Panangaden, P.: Approximate reasoning for real-time probabilistic processes. In: QEST 2004, pp. 304–313. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henzinger, T.A., Raskin, J.-F.: Robust undecidability of timed and hybrid systems. In: Lynch, N.A., Krogh, B.H. (eds.) HSCC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1790, pp. 145–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, J., Voeten, J., Geilen, M.: Real-time property preservation in approximations of timed systems. In: MEMOCODE 2003, pp. 163–171. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, J., Voeten, J., Geilen, M.: Real-time property preservation in concurrent real-time systems. In: RTCSA 2004. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Puri, A.: Dynamical properties of timed automata. In: Ravn, A.P., Rischel, H. (eds.) FTRTFT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1486, pp. 210–227. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Tasiran, S.: Compositional and Hierarchical Techniques for the Formal Verification of Real-Time Systems. Dissertation, UC Berkeley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Wulf, M., Doyen, L., Raskin, J.-F.: Almost ASAP semantics: From timed models to timed implementations. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 296–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Prabhu, V.S. (2005). Quantifying Similarities Between Timed Systems. In: Pettersson, P., Yi, W. (eds) Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems. FORMATS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11603009_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11603009_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30946-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31616-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics