Skip to main content

Why Special Relativity Should Not Be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
Physical Theory and its Interpretation

Part of the book series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 72))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Yuri Balashov and Michel Janssen. Critical notice: Presentism and relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54:327–46, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John S. Bell. How to teach special relativity. Progress in Scientific Culture, 1, 1976. Reprinted in Bell (1987), pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • John S. Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • John S. Bell. George Francis FitzGerald. Physics World, 5:31–35, 1992. 1989 lecture, abridged by Denis Weare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey R. Brown. The origins of length contraction: I the FitzGerald-Lorentz deformation hypothesis. American Journal of Physics, 69:1044–1054, 2001. E-prints: arXive:gr-qc/0104032; PITT-PHILSCI 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey R. Brown. Einstein’s misgivings about his 1905 formulation of special relativity. European Journal of Physics, 26:S85S90, special Einstein issue, 2005a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey R. Brown. Physical relativity: space-time structure from a dynamical perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey R. Brown and Oliver Pooley. The origins of the spacetime metric: Bell’s Lorentzian pedagogy and its significance in general relativity. In Callender and Huggett (2001), pp. 256–272, 2001. E-print: arXive:gr-qc/9908048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey R. Brown and Oliver Pooley. Minkowski space-time: a glorious non-entity. To appear in The ontology of spacetime, Dennis Dieks (ed.), Elsevier, 2006. An earlier version appeared in arXive: physics/0403088 and PITT-PHIL-SCI 1661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey Bub. Why the quantum? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35:241–66, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig Callender and Nick Huggett (ed.). Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rob Clifton, Jeffrey Bub, and Hans Halvorson. Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information theoretic constraints. Foundations of Physics, 33(11):1561, 2003. Page references to arXive: quant-ph/0211089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis Dieks. The “reality” of the Lorentz contraction. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 15:33–45, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur S. Eddington. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. Zur elektrodynamik bewegter körper. Annalen der Physik, 17:891–921, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. Bemerkung zur Notiz des Herrn P. Ehrenfest: Translation deformierbarer Elektronen und der Flächensatz. Annalen der Physik, 23:206–208, 1907. English translation in Einstein (1989), Doc. 44, pp. 236–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. What is the theory of relativity? The London Times, 1919. Reprinted in Einstein (1982), pp. 227–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. Geometrie und erfahrung. Erweite Fassung des Festvortrages gehalten an der presussischen Akademie Springer: Berlin, 1921. Translated by S. Bargmann as ‘Geometry and Experience’ in Einstein (1982), pp. 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. Autobiographical notes. In P. A. Schilpp, editor, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Vol. 1, pages 1–94. Open Court, Illinois, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein. Letter to Arnold Sommerfeld, January 14, 1908. Document 73 in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 5, The Swiss Years: Correspondence, 1902–1914 (English Translation Supplement, M. J. Klein, A. J. Kox and R. Schulmann (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton. Translated by A. Beck., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Galison. Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps. Empires of Time. Hodder and Stoughton, London, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans Halvorson. On information-theoretic characterizations of physical theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(2):277–93, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Jánossy. Theory of Relativity based on Physical Reality. Akadémie Kiadó, Budapest, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Larmor. Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham Pais. ‘Subtle is the Lord …’ The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang Pauli. Theory of Relativity. Dover, New York, 1981. Originally published as ‘Relativitätstheorie’, Encyklopädie der matematischenWissenschaften, mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen vol 5. Physik ed. A. Sommerfeld (Tauber, Leibzig), 1921; pp. 539–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. F. G. Swann. Relativity, the FitzGerald-Lorentz contraction, and quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 13:197–202, 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher G. Timpson. The applicability of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics and Zeilinger’s foundational principle. Philosophy of Science, Supplement: Proceedings of PSA, 70: 1233–44, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher G. Timpson. On a supposed conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33:441–68, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher G. Timpson. Quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antony Valentini. Universal signature of non-quantum systems. arXive: quant-ph/0309107, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, H.R., Timpson, C.G. (2006). Why Special Relativity Should Not Be a Template for a Fundamental Reformulation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Demopoulos, W., Pitowsky, I. (eds) Physical Theory and its Interpretation. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4876-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics