Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an Understanding of Statistical Thinking

  • Chapter
Book cover The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailar, B. (1988). Statistical practice and research: The essential interactions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabba, V. (1991). Through a glass lens darkly. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86(413), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. (1995). What is statistics? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 158 (Part 1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Friedlander, A. (1997). Statistical thinking in a technological environment. In J. Garfield & G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics (pp. 45–55). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R. (1994). Probabilistic thinking, statistical reasoning and the search for causes: Do we need a probabilistic revolution after we have taught data analysis? In J. Garfield (Ed.), Research Papers from The Fourth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Marrakech, 1994. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R. (1999). Discussion: Learning to think statistically and to cope with variation. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 259–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R., & Steinbring, H. (1991). Entdeckende Statistik, Stengel-und-Blatter, Boxplots: Konzepte, Begrundungen und Erfahrungen eines Unterrichtsversuches. Der Mathematikunterricht, 37(6), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, J. F. (1978). R. A. Fisher, The life of a scientist. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, J. F. (1997). Fisher, Ronald Aylmer. In N. Johnson & S. Kotz (Eds.), Leading personalities in statistical sciences: From the 17th century to the present. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britz, G., Emerling, D., Hare, L., Hoerl, R., & Shade, J. (1997). How to teach others to apply statistical thinking. Quality Progress, June 1997, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chance, B. (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Retrieved February 10, 2003 from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/chance.html

  • Cline Cohen, P. (1982). A calculating people: The spread of numeracy in early America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Mathematics, statistics and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. B. (1984). Florence Nightingale. Scientific American, 250(3), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, F. (1962). Games, gods and gambling. London: Charles Griffen.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1986). Descartes’ dream. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1992). The psychology of learning probability. In F. & S. Gordon (Eds.), Statistics for the twenty-first century. MAA Notes, no. 29 (pp. 151–164). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S., & Tanur, J. (1996). Reconsidering the fundamental contributions of Fisher and Neyman on experimentation and sampling. International Statistical Review, 64(3), 237–253.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gail, M. (1996). Statistics in action. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(433), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1997). Assessing students’ interpretation of data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), IASE papers on statistical education ICME-8, Spain, 1996 (pp. 49–57). Hawthorn, Australia: Swinburne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2000). Statistical literacy: Conceptual and instructional issues. In D. Coben, J. O’Donoghue, & G. FitzSimons (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics (pp. 135–150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I., Ahlgren, C., Burrill, G., Landwehr, J., Rich, W., & Begg, A. (1995). Working group: Assessment of interpretive skills. In Writing group draft summaries, Conference on Assessment Issues in Statistics Education (pp. 23–25). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. (1970). Medical statistics from Graunt to Farr. In E. S. Pearson & M. G. Kendall (Eds.), Studies in the history of statistics and probability (pp. 47–126). London: Charles Griffen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G., & Meeker, W. (1993). Assumptions for statistical inference. American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, C., Kaput, J., & Goldsmith, L. (1992). Authentic enquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, L., Hoerl, R., Hromi, J., & Snee, R. (1995, February). The role of statistical thinking in management. Quality Progress, 28(2), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. (1996). Can a mathematically-educated person be statistically illiterate? Mathematics for the new Millennium—What needs to be changed and why? Nuffield Foundation: pre-conference paper (pp. 107–117).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. (1997). Discussion—New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 141–146.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58, 295–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R., Hahn, G., & Doganaksoy, N. (1997). Discussion—New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, B. (1994). Fourth generation management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, B., & Gaudard, M. (1990, December). Variation, management, and W. Edwards Deming. Quality Progress, 23(12), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1970). Where shall the history of statistics begin? In E. S. Pearson & M. G. Kendall (Eds.), Studies in the history of statistics and probability (pp. 45–46). London: Charles Griffen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring, J. (1997). Discussion—New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 153.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., Arnold, G., Carter, M., Kelly, P., & Thornley, G. (1993). The mathematical needs of New Zealand school leavers. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., Lohmeier, J., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Falk, R., & Lipson, A. (1991). Novice views on randomness. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education—North American Chapter (pp. 167–173). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Students analyzing data: Research of critical barriers. In J. Garfield & G. Burrill (Eds.), Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics (Proceedings of the 1996 International Association of Statistics Education round table conference, pp. 151–167). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., & Johnson, N. (1992). Breakthroughs in statistics, Volumes I–III. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, T. (1997). Fisher’s contributions to statistics. Resonance Journal of Science Education, 2(9), 32–37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lightner, J. (1991). A brief look at the history of probability and statistics. Mathematics Teacher, 84(8), 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C. (1998). 1997 Fisher Memorial Lecture: The zeroth problem. American Statistician, 52(1), 1–9.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McKean, K. (1985, June). Decisions, decisions. Discover, 6, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1992). Mathematics in New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1992a). Statistics for all: Why? What and how? In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Vol. 1 (pp. 423–428). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1992b). Teaching statistics as a respectable subject. In F. & S. Gordon (Eds.), Statistics for the twenty-first century. MAA Notes, no. 26 (pp. 14–25). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123–165.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1253–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M. (1997). Statistical thinking: One statistician’s perspective. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 406–413). Rotorua, New Zealand: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M., & Rubick, A. (2002). An exploration of students’ statistical thinking with given data. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(2), 4–21. Retrieved December 19, 2002 from http://fehps.une.edu.au/serj/

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking 1820-1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost, L., & Norman, C. (1990, December). Variation through the ages. Quality Progress, 23(12), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyzdek, T. (1990). There’s no such thing as a common cause. Proceedings of American Society for Quality Control 44 th Annual Quality Congress Transactions—San Francisco (pp. 102–108). Milwaukee, WI: ASQC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salsburg, D. (2001). The lady tasting tea: How statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. (1997). Discussion—New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 156–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. (2001). Statistics education: Perusing the past, embracing the present, and charting the future. Newsletter of the Section on Statistical Education of the American Statistical Association, 7(1), Winter 2001. (Reprinted in Statistics Education Research Newsletter, 2(2), May 2001. Retrieved May 18, 2001 from http://www.ugr.es/local/batanero/sergroup.htm)

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1997). Missed opportunities in research on the teaching and learning of data and chance. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 6–22). Rotorua, New Zealand: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J., & Greer, B. (1996). Data handling. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 205–238). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M., Watson, J., Moritz, J., & Reading, C. (1999). School mathematics students’ acknowledgement of statistical variation. Paper presented at the research pre-sessions of 77th annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Francisco, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W., & Deming, W. E. (Ed.). (1986). Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. (1990). Statistical thinking and its contribution to quality. American Statistician, 44(2), 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. (1993). What’s missing in statistical education? American Statistician, 47(2), 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee, R. (1999). Discussion: Development and use of statistical thinking: A new era. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. (1986). The history of statistics—The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3–20). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. (Originally published in Science, 185 (1974), 1124-1131.)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, N. (1995). Statistical or quantitative thinking as a fundamental intelligence. Unpublished paper, County College of Morris, Randolph, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 107–121). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., Collis, K., Callingham, R., & Moritz, J. (1995). A model for assessing higher order thinking in statistics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry (with discussion). International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–265.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Auckland, New Zealand

    Maxine Pfannkuch & Chris Wild

Authors
  1. Maxine Pfannkuch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Wild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Dani Ben-Zvi

  2. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

    Joan Garfield

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C. (2004). Towards an Understanding of Statistical Thinking. In: Ben-Zvi, D., Garfield, J. (eds) The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2277-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2278-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation