Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 33, Issue 5, November 2001, Pages 415-421
Preventive Medicine

Regular Article
Provider Feedback Improves Adherence with AHCPR Smoking Cessation Guideline

https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0907Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. This study evaluated the effect of primary care providers' adherence with the AHCPR Smoking Cessation Guideline after receiving a multicomponent intervention.

Methods. A quasi-experimental study with one intervention and one control team was conducted in a southeastern Veterans Affairs Medical Center primary care setting. During phase I, chart reviews were conducted to measure baseline provider adherence and documentation of the four A's (ask, advise, assist, arrange). In phase II, the intervention team received a single educational session on the AHCPR Guideline, four A's, and tobacco dependence treatment. This was followed by chart reviews of patients seen 4 to 8 weeks after the educational intervention to measure provider adherence and documentation of the four A's. During phase III, the intervention team received individual and team feedback from the chart reviews in phases I and II and booster education on the AHCPR Guideline. Chart reviews were conducted from patient visits 4 to 8 weeks after the feedback and booster education to determine provider adherence and documentation of the four A's.

Results. A nested repeated measures two-factor analysis of variance was performed for each of the following outcomes: ask, advise, assist, and arrange. Data analyses revealed that both the control and the intervention teams had 100% compliance in asking the patient about smoking status. There was a prestudy implementation of the vital sign stamp that included smoking status in this setting. Education on tobacco dependence and the AHCPR Guideline had no significant impact on provider performance with the advisement, assistance, and arrangement of follow-up. However, significant improvements occurred in the intervention team in the advisement (P = 0.05), assistance (P = 0.001), and arrangement of follow-up (P = 0.001) phase after individual and team feedback was provided. This research supports the fact that feedback impacts individuals and team performances and facilitated positive system changes to improve provider adherence with the AHCPR recommendations in treating tobacco dependence.

References (37)

  • MMWR

    (1996)
  • Research report series: Nicotine addiction

    (1998)
  • Fiore, M, C, Bailey, W, C, Cohen, S, J, et al, Smoking cessation: Clinical practice guideline No. 18, Rockville, MD, US...
  • Counseling to prevent tobacco use

    (1996)
  • JK Ockene et al.

    Increasing the efficiency of physician-delivered smoking interventions: A randomized clinical trial

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1991)
  • Helping smokers quit—A guide for primary care clinicians

    (1996)
  • Smoking cessation—A systems approach

    (1997)
  • Smoking cessation consumer guide—You can quit smoking

    (1997)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Teen CHAT: Development and utilization of a web-based intervention to improve physician communication with adolescents about healthy weight

      2013, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      One central and distinguishing feature of this intervention was that the program was tailored to each individual physician using audio clips from their baseline encounters along with other baseline data. Feedback regarding a provider's own performance of certain skills has been shown to be a crucial element associated with provider's improved use of those skills [23]. For each physician, we included up to 23 audio clips from the individual physicians’ recorded encounters with their own patients.

    • Boosting Population Quits Through Evidence-Based Cessation Treatment and Policy

      2010, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The 2008 Guideline6 suggests that incentive and reward programs combined with feedback on provider performance may ultimately prove the best approach for improving physician intervention. Evidence from other types of health services confirm the importance of incentive and reward programs,64 but the few studies on the use of these approaches to encourage physician counseling for cessation have yielded mixed results.65,66 However, as the evidence base grows, existing healthcare performance standards and policies could be expanded to include evidence-based recommendations for cessation treatment–related performance measurement, feedback systems, and financial incentives to providers.58,59

    • Clinical Preventive Services for Adolescents

      2009, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research project was supported by the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs (NOVA) Foundation.

    2

    To whom reprint requests should be addressed. Fax: (706) 721-1498. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text