Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 305, Issue 5, 2 February 2001, Pages 1057-1072
Journal home page for Journal of Molecular Biology

Regular article
Water and ion binding around r(UpA)12and d(TpA)12Oligomers - comparison with RNA and DNA (CpG)12 duplexes1,

https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4360Get rights and content

Abstract

The structural and dynamic properties of the water and ion first coordination shell of the r(A-U) and d(A-T) base-pairs embedded within the r(UpA)12and d(TpA)12duplexes are described on the basis of two 2.4 ns molecular dynamics simulations performed in a neutralizing aqueous environment with 0.25 M added KCl. The results are compared to previous molecular dynamics simulations of the r(CpG)12and d(CpG)12structures performed under similar conditions. It can be concluded that: (i) RNA helices are more rigid than DNA helices of identical sequence, as reflected by the fact that RNA duplexes keep their initial A-form shape while DNA duplexes adopt more sequence-specific shapes. (ii) Around these base-pairs, the water molecules occupy 21 to 22 well-defined hydration sites, some of which are partially occupied by potassium ions. (iii) These hydration sites are occupied by an average of 21.9, 21.0, 20.1, and 19.8 solvent molecules (water and ions) around the r(G=C), r(A-U), d(G=C), and d(A-T) pairs, respectively. (iv) From a dynamic point of view, the stability of the hydration shell is the strongest for the r(G=C) pairs and the weakest for the d(A-T) pairs. (v) For RNA, the observed long-lived hydration patterns are essentially non-sequence dependent and involve water bridges located in the deep groove and linking OR atoms of adjacent phosphate groups. Maximum lifetimes are close to 400 ps. (vi) In contrast, for DNA, long-lived hydration patterns are sequence dependent and located in the minor groove. For d(CpG)12, water bridges linking the (G)N3 and (C)O2 with the O4′ atoms of adjacent nucleotides with 400 ps maximum lifetimes are characterized while no such bridges are observed for d(TpA)12. (vii) Potassium ions are observed to bind preferentially to deep/major groove atoms at RpY steps, essentially d(GpC), r(GpC), and r(ApU), by forming ion-bridges between electronegative atoms of adjacent base-pairs. On average, about half an ion is observed per base-pair. Positive ion-binding determinants are related to the proximity of two or more electronegative atoms. Negative binding determinants are associated with the electrostatic and steric hindrance due to the proximity of electropositive amino groups and neutral methyl groups. Potassium ions form only transient contacts with phosphate groups.

Introduction

A large number of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of RNA and DNA regular helical structures generated with several independently parameterized force-fields Cornell et al 1995, Langley 1998, Cheatham et al 1999, Foloppe and MacKerell 2000 and efficient methods to treat the long-range electrostatic interactions Darden et al 1999, Sagui and Darden 1999 are now available Cheatham and Kollman 1996, Cheatham and Kollman 1997, Duan et al 1997, Young et al 1997b, Bonvin et al 1998, Cheatham et al 1998, Flatters and Lavery 1998, Lyubartsev and Laaksonen 1998, Young and Beveridge 1998, Bostock-Smith et al 1999, Cheatham et al 1999, Sherer et al 1999, Sprous et al 1999, Auffinger and Westhof 2000, Castrignano et al 2000, Hamelberg et al 2000, MacKerell and Banavali 2000, Steff and Koca 2000, Trantirek et al 2000. For RNA, a consensual view emerges indicating that MD techniques describe accurately the structural and dynamic properties of helical structures. RNA Watson-Crick helices display only slight environmental-dependent behaviors, although the situation seems more complex for the simulation of larger RNA structures involving intricate tertiary motifs Hermann et al 1998, Auffinger et al 1999, Schneider and Suhnel 1999, the folding of which is strongly related, among other factors, to the mono and divalent ionic strength. For DNA, the concept of a force-field-dependent polymorphism has been proposed (Auffinger & Westhof, 1998c), essentially on the basis of MD simulations of identical structures with the AMBER (Cornell et al., 1995) and CHARMM (MacKerell et al., 1995) force-fields which displayed a tendency to move either toward B or A-DNA helical structures, respectively Feig and Pettitt 1997, Feig and Pettitt 1998b, Feig and Pettitt 1999a. Besides, DNA helices are much more prone to environmental and sequence-dependent polymorphism Saenger 1984, Dickerson 1999 than RNA helices, and several experimental data support the idea of a structural continuum existing between the well-characterized A and B-DNA conformations (Ng et al., 2000). Thus, the increasing number of DNA shapes leads to a new challenge to reproduce and understand the complex physicochemical properties of these systems in order to deconvolute structural and environmental issues from force-field-dependent effects.

This aim cannot be achieved without a careful, complete, and systematic description of the structure and dynamics of the hydration shells and of the ionic atmosphere which surround nucleic acids as a function of their dependence on sequence and environment Clementi 1983, Saenger 1984, Westhof 1988, Westhof and Beveridge 1990, Jeffrey and Saenger 1991, Westhof 1993, Hummer et al 1995, Hummer et al 1996, Feig and Pettitt 1998a, Auffinger and Westhof 1999. Additionally, the structural and functional characteristics of the numerous non-canonical base-pairs found in all natural RNA molecules cannot be completely understood without a comparison with sound data gathered from theoretical and experimental work on the basic Watson-Crick base-pairs.

Here, we present data extracted from two 2.4 ns MD simulations of the r(UpA)12and d(TpA)12duplexes in an aqueous environment with 0.25 M KCl added. The results are described and compared with respect to those gathered for G=C pairs which were extracted from MD simulations of the r(CpG)12and d(CpG)12duplexes performed under similar conditions (Auffinger & Westhof, 2000). These simulations should provide further clues to the role played by the two single chemical modifications which differentiate RNA from DNA, namely the presence or absence of a 2′-OH (all nucleotides) and the methyl group, present only on DNA thymine bases Wang and Kool 1995, Cheatham and Kollman 1997, Auffinger and Westhof 2000. The choice of K+over the more frequently used Na+has been dictated by the fact that K+is a dominant ion in the intracellular media and by the increasing number of reports describing, beside the major role played by magnesium cations, the essential structural and functional roles played by these ions Gluick et al 1997a, Gluick et al 1997b, Basu et al 1998, Klosterman et al 1999, Batey et al 2000, Shiman and Draper 2000. It is worth noting that a K+-binding site has been uncovered in the ribosome peptidyl transferase active site (Nissen et al., 2000). Most of these sites are ion-type specific, as are similar monovalent ion-binding sites occurring in DNA (reviewed by McFail-Isom et al., 1999). From the methodological point of view, potassium ions are more adapted to the time-scales accessible to current MD studies in the sense that the residence times of water molecules in the first hydration shell of K+is shorter than that of water molecules around Na+. Thus, K+can be dehydrated more easily than Na+and the relaxation time of the formation of direct ion/nucleic acid interactions is shorter.

Here, several structural characteristics of the r(UpA)12and d(TpA)12duplexes will be described. Then, the first coordination shells surrounding the r(A-U) and d(A-T) base-pairs will be characterized in terms of the number of binding sites and the occupancy factors for water molecules and potassium ions. Next, the dynamics of water molecules and ions present in the first coordination shell will be analyzed in order to obtain estimates of the residence times of the solvent molecules in the various coordination sites.

Section snippets

Global structural features

The r(UpA)12and the d(TpA)12alternating oligomers retain their structural integrity during the 2.4 ns MD trajectories. r(UpA)12remains close to its initial A-form shape (Figure 1) while a root-mean-square (RMS) drift comparable to that observed for the d(CpG)12is noted for the d(TpA)12duplex, which has been interpreted as a drift toward a structure with some A-like characteristics (Auffinger & Westhof, 2000). The RMS deviations between the average structures (500 to 2000 ps) calculated for all

Water coordination sites

It can be estimated that approximately 21 hydration sites surround r(A-U) and d(A-T) pairs (Figure 6). These sites are occupied by an average of 20.2 r(A-U) and 19.4 d(A-T) water molecules (or 21.0 and 19.8 solvent molecules - water and ions; Table 3). Thus, an excess of about one (0.8 to 1.2) solvent molecule is found in the first hydration shell of r(A-U) compared to d(A-T) pairs. The hydration shell around the r(A-U) pair is less well defined than around the corresponding r(G=C) pair. This

Relative rigidity of RNA and DNA duplexes

As observed for the r(G=C)12and d(G=C)12oligomers and other duplexes Norberg and Nilsson 1996, Cheatham and Kollman 1997, Cheatham et al 1999, MacKerell and Banavali 2000, the sugar pucker profiles of the r(UpA)12and d(TpA)12duplexes reveal that DNA helices are more mobile than RNA helices. This is further confirmed by the larger number of backbone dihedral transitions detected in DNA (Table 1). These data are in agreement with experimental observations indicating that RNA duplexes are more

Summary and conclusions

The following observations can be derived from the present studies:

  • (i)

    RNA helices are less mobile than DNA helices. This property is reflected by the stability of the hydration shell surrounding RNA and DNA structures and is most obvious for G=C pairs.

  • (ii)

    An average of 21 to 22 hydration sites surround the RNA and DNA base-pairs These hydration sites are occupied by 21.9 r(G=C), 21.0 r(A-U), 20.1 d(G=C), and 19.8 d(A-T) solvent molecules - water and ions. Thus, r(G=C) and d(A-T) pairs are the most and

Computational methods

Here, in order to facilitate comparisons with previous MD simulations performed on the r(CpG)12and d(CpG)12duplexes (Auffinger & Westhof, 2000), similar system sizes and parameters have been used. The AMBER 5.0 simulation package Pearlman et al 1995, Case et al 1997 along with the Cornell et al. (1995)force-field have been used. The duplexes were placed in a box containing 5690 (RNA) and 5559 (DNA) SPC/E water molecules (Berendsen et al., 1987) as well as 72 K+and 26 Clions corresponding to a

Supplementary Files

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Georges Wipff and Etienne Engler for the use of their MD Draw display program (Engler & Wipff, 1994) and Loren Dean Williams for helpful discussions and for making preprints available.

References (111)

  • Y. Duan et al.

    Molecular dynamics simulation study of DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2in solution conformation and hydration

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1997)
  • M. Feig et al.

    Crystallographic water sites from a theoretical perspective

    Structure

    (1998)
  • M. Feig et al.

    Structural equilibrium of DNA represented with different force-fields

    Biophys. J.

    (1998)
  • M. Feig et al.

    Modeling high-resolution hydration patterns in correlation with DNA sequence and conformation

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • M. Feig et al.

    Sodium and chlorine ions as part of the DNA solvation shell

    Biophys. J.

    (1999)
  • D. Flatters et al.

    Sequence-dependent dynamics of TATA-box binding sites

    Biophys. J.

    (1998)
  • T.C. Gluick et al.

    Effects of Mg2+, K+, and H+on an equilibrium between alternative conformations of an RNA pseudoknot

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1997)
  • N.V. Hud et al.

    Localization of ammonium ions in the minor groove of DNA duplexes in solution and the origin of DNA A-tract bending

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • G. Hummer et al.

    Hydration of nucleic acid fragmentscomparison of theory and experiment for high-resolution crystal structures of RNA, DNA, and DNA-drug complexes

    Biophys. J.

    (1995)
  • L. McFail-Isom et al.

    DNA structurecations in charge?

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (1999)
  • D.A. Pearlman et al.

    AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (1995)
  • A.T. Phan et al.

    Determination of the residence time for water molecules hydrating B′-DNA and B-DNA, by the one-dimensional zero-enhancement nuclear Overhauser effect

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • B. Schneider et al.

    Hydration of the DNA bases is local

    Biophys. J.

    (1995)
  • B. Schneider et al.

    Hydration of the phosphate group in double-helical DNA

    Biophys. J.

    (1998)
  • N.C. Seeman et al.

    RNA double-helical fragments at atomic resolution. I. The crystal and molecular structure of sodium adenylyl-3′,5′-uridine hexahydrate

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1976)
  • R. Shiman et al.

    Stabilization of RNA tertiary structure by monovalent cations

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • D. Sprous et al.

    Molecular dynamics studies of axis bending in d(G5-(GA4T4C)2-C5) and d(G5-(GT4A4C)2-C5)effects of sequence polarity on DNA curvature

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1999)
  • M. Sunnerhagen et al.

    Water molecules in DNA recognition Ihydration lifetimes of trp operator DNA in solution measured by NMR spectroscopy

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1998)
  • L. Trantirek et al.

    An A-type double helix of DNA having B-type puckering of the deoxyribose rings

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • M.C. Wahl et al.

    C-H…O hydrogen bonding in biology

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1997)
  • S. Arnott et al.

    Atomic coordinates and molecular conformations for DNA-DNA, RNA-RNA, and DNA-RNA helices

  • P. Auffinger et al.

    Effects of pseudouridylation on tRNA hydration and dynamicsa theoretical approach

  • P. Auffinger et al.

    RNA base-pair hydration

    J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam.

    (1998)
  • P. Auffinger et al.

    Roles of hydration on the structure and dynamics of nucleic acids

  • P. Auffinger et al.

    Water and ion binding around RNA and DNA (C,G)-oligomers

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • P. Auffinger et al.

    Molecular dynamics simulations of the anticodon hairpin of tRNAAspstructuring effects of C-H…O hydrogen bonds and of long-range hydration forces

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1996)
  • S. Basu et al.

    A specific monovalent metal ion integral to the AA platform of the RNA tetraloop receptor

    Nature Struct. Biol.

    (1998)
  • R.T. Batey et al.

    Crystal structure of the ribonucleoprotein core of the signal recognition particle

    Science

    (2000)
  • H.J.C. Berendsen et al.

    The missing term in effective pair potential

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1987)
  • A.M.J.J. Bonvin

    Localisation and dynamics of sodium counterions around DNA in solution from molecular dynamics simulation

    Eur. Biophys. J.

    (2000)
  • C.E. Bostock-Smith et al.

    Solution structure and dynamics of the A-T tract DNA decamer duplex d(GGTAATTACC)2-implications for recognition by minor-groove binding-drugs

    Biochem. J.

    (1999)
  • D.A. Case et al.

    AMBER 5.0

    (1997)
  • T.E. Cheatham et al.

    Observation of the A-DNA to B-DNA transition during unrestrained molecular dynamics in aqueous solution

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1996)
  • T.E. Cheatham et al.

    Molecular dynamics simulations highlight the structural differences among DNA: DNA, RNA:RNA, and DNA:RNA hybrid duplexes

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1997)
  • T.E. Cheatham et al.

    Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids in solutionhow sensitive are the results to small perturbations in the force field and environment?

  • T.E. Cheatham et al.

    Molecular dynamics and continuum solvent studies of the stability of polyG-polyC and polyA-polyT DNA duplexes in solution

    J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam.

    (1998)
  • T.E. Cheatham et al.

    A modified version of the Cornell et al. force field with improved sugar pucker phases and helical repeat

    J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam.

    (1999)
  • E. Clementi

    Structure of water and counterions for DNA

  • M.R. Conte et al.

    Hydration of the RNA duplex r(CGCAAAUUUGCG)2determined by NMR

    Nucl. Acids Res.

    (1996)
  • W.D. Cornell et al.

    A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (104)

    • DNA Minor Groove Binders as Therapeutic Agents

      2017, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry II
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplemetary data associated with this article can be found at JMB Online

    1

    Edited by I. Tinoco

    View full text