Regular Article
Protein Fouling of Track-Etched Polycarbonate Microfiltration Membranes

https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1994.1338Get rights and content

Abstract

Bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions of 0.1 g/liter and 1.0 g/liter were filtered through 0.05 μm and 0.2 μm polycarbonate microfiltration membranes using a stir cell. Total resistance versus time and permeate concentration versus time curves and scanning electron micrographs were generated. From these, together with comparing the results to internal and external fouling models, several different founding mechanisms are hypothesized. For 0.1 g/liter concentration and 0.2 μm pore diameter, the fouling occurs at the mouths of the pores, slowly closing off pore entrance areas while allowing complete transmission of the protein for a period of time. Eventually, the pores become so constricted that protein transmission decreases and a layer of rejected protein forms on the external membrane surface. For 0.1 g/liter concentration and 0.05 μm pore diameter, fouling immediately closes off pores, and permeate concentration decreases quickly. For 1.0 g/liter concentration and 0.2 pm pore diameter, the fouling allows for nearly complete transmission of proteins for the entire length of the experiment, unlike the more dilute case of 0.1 g/liter. Since the diameters of BSA molecules are more than an order of magnitude smaller than the pore radii, it is believed that the proteins form aggregates which accumulate on or just below the top surface of the membrane, depending on their size relative to the pore openings.

References (0)

Cited by (231)

  • A review of membrane fouling by proteins in ultrafiltration and microfiltration

    2022, Journal of Water Process Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    It has been reported that cake filtration is the dominant method of fouling irrespective of the membrane pore size for a concentrated BSA solution, indicating that BSA aggregates were responsible for resistance build-up [81]. However, protein rejection was almost 100 % for a smaller pore size (0.05 μm), while transmission was almost 100 % for a larger pore size (2 μm), indicating that BSA monomers that pass through the aggregate filter cake expectedly clog up the smaller-pore membrane faster than the larger-pore one [81]. Huisman et al. reported that protein-membrane interactions during initial filtration and protein-protein interactions in the later stages of filtration dictated membrane resistance for membranes with smaller pores (~5 nm), while these interactions had little effect on the fouling behavior for membranes with larger pores (~30 nm) and pH, instead, played a more dominant role, as shown in Fig. 18 [43].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text