Regular ArticlesSelective Transport of Animal Parts by Ancient Hunters: A New Statistical Method and an Application to the Emeryville Shellmound Fauna
References (44)
- et al.
Plant utility indices: Two Great Basin examples
Journal of Archaeological Science
(1996) Perspectives on skeletal part profiles and utility curves
Resource intensification among hunter-gatherers: Acorn economies in prehistoric California
Research in Economic Anthropology
(1987)Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory
(1991)Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology
(1978)Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths
(1981)Hottentot food remains and their bearing on the interpretation of fossil bone assemblages
Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station
(1967)Who killed the Swartkrans ape-man?
South African Museum Bulletin
(1968)The contribution of Namib Desert Hottentots to and understanding of australopithecine bone accumulations
Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station
(1969)Declines in mammalian foraging efficiency during the late Holocene
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
(1994)
Late Holocene resource intensification in the Sacremento Valley, California
Journal of Archaeological Science
Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure: Ichthyofaunal evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound
Antiquity
Resource Depression and Intensification During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: Evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound Vertebrate Fauna, volume 32 of Anthropological Records
Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processing
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Local regression models
Ancient North America: Tha Archaeology of a Continent. 2nd edition
Composition of California shellmounds
University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology
Danger Cave, Last Supper Cave, and Hanging Rock Shelter: The faunas
Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History
Bone transport, bone destruction, and reverse utility curves
Journal of Archaeological Science
Evolution of marine mammal hunting: A view from the California and Oregon coasts
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Reasserting a prehistoric tragedy of the commons: Reply to Lyman
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Cited by (28)
Coast-proximal inland archaeology and the Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis)
2021, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsCitation Excerpt :In archaeological contexts, evaluation of animal portions in terms of relative food utility as an indicator of transport has most often been conducted on large prey species such as ungulates that could not easily have been carried whole by hunter-gatherers. In contexts in which load weights were limited and animal portions had to be chosen for transport, high food value has often been prioritized (Binford, 1978; Bunn, 1986; Cannon, 2003; Faith, 2007; Klein, 1989; Meltzer et al., 2002; O’Connell et al., 1988; Perkins and Daly, 1968; Rogers and Broughton, 2001; Stiner, 1991). Processing and transport are likely to have been somewhat different considerations when prey animals were small and unlike larger prey could easily have been carried away from capture locations in their entirety.
Hunting and skeletal element abundance of guanaco during the Holocene of Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina
2020, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsOptimal Foraging Theory: Application and Inspiration in Human Endeavors Outside Biology
2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Second Edition: Volume 1-5Optimal foraging theory: Application and inspiration in human endeavors outside biology
2019, Encyclopedia of Animal BehaviorBiogenic control on the origin of a vertebrate monotypic accumulation from the Late Triassic of southern Brazil
2015, GeobiosCitation Excerpt :Based on the first hypothesis, we should find skulls and jaws with some signs of abrasion and a high degree of fragmentation, both caused by impact of grains against their surface during hydraulic flow, which is actually not the case. On the other hand, fossil concentrations with no visible preferred spatial orientation of bioclasts in the matrix and predominance of cranial elements are generally explained as resulting from biogenic activity (predators or scavengers act on the carcasses causing bioclastic sorting; Badgley, 1986; Rogers and Broughton, 2001; Bertoni-Machado et al., 2008). According to Behrensmeyer (1991), the poor representation of postcranial elements in vertebrate accumulations results from preferential dispersion by predators/scavengers, as such bone elements are the most nutritious parts of the prey.