Regular Articles
Selective Transport of Animal Parts by Ancient Hunters: A New Statistical Method and an Application to the Emeryville Shellmound Fauna

https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0601Get rights and content

Abstract

When deciding which parts of a prey animal to transport home, hunters may be more or less selective. In our vocabulary, unselective hunters are those who usually bring home most of the carcass; selective hunters are those who usually abandon all but the choicest (and/or lightest) parts. This paper uses the abcml statistical method to develop a means of estimating transport selectivity from the frequencies of skeletal parts in a faunal assemblage. It then applies the method to artiodactyl data from the Emeryville Shellmound in order to test the local depression and distant patch use hypothesis. This hypothesis predicts that selectivity should decline during the early part of the Emeryville sequence and rise during the later part. The initial analysis did reveal such a pattern, but this pattern disappeared when samples were pooled in order to produce acceptably narrow confidence intervals. Although this result weakens the hypothesis, it does not firmly refute it, because the model fits the data imperfectly in the critical middle portion of the sequence. Abcml also provides estimates of the intensity of attrition, which indicate that attrition was most severe in early strata and least severe in later ones. Substantial attrition (50% of bones surviving) is indicated even from samples that show no indication of attrition using conventional methods. These conclusions are based on assumptions about the processes of transport and attrition that are more reliable in qualitative outline than in quantitative detail. Consequently, the paper's qualitative conclusions are more trustworthy than its quantitative estimates.

References (44)

  • K.R. Barlow et al.

    Plant utility indices: Two Great Basin examples

    Journal of Archaeological Science

    (1996)
  • Laurence E.J. Bartram

    Perspectives on skeletal part profiles and utility curves

  • M. Basgall

    Resource intensification among hunter-gatherers: Acorn economies in prehistoric California

    Research in Economic Anthropology

    (1987)
  • R.L. Bettinger

    Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory

    (1991)
  • L.R. Binford

    Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology

    (1978)
  • L.R. Binford

    Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths

    (1981)
  • C.K. Brain

    Hottentot food remains and their bearing on the interpretation of fossil bone assemblages

    Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station

    (1967)
  • C.K. Brain

    Who killed the Swartkrans ape-man?

    South African Museum Bulletin

    (1968)
  • C.K. Brain

    The contribution of Namib Desert Hottentots to and understanding of australopithecine bone accumulations

    Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station

    (1969)
  • J.M. Broughton

    Declines in mammalian foraging efficiency during the late Holocene

    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

    (1994)
  • J.M. Broughton

    Late Holocene resource intensification in the Sacremento Valley, California

    Journal of Archaeological Science

    (1994)
  • Broughton, J. M. 1995, Resource Depression and Intensification During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: Evidence...
  • J.M. Broughton

    Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure: Ichthyofaunal evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound

    Antiquity

    (1997)
  • J.M. Broughton

    Resource Depression and Intensification During the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: Evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound Vertebrate Fauna, volume 32 of Anthropological Records

    (1999)
  • H.T. Bunn et al.

    Variability in bone assemblage formation from Hadza hunting, scavenging, and carcass processing

    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

    (1988)
  • W.S. Cleveland et al.

    Local regression models

  • B. Fagan

    Ancient North America: Tha Archaeology of a Continent. 2nd edition

    (1995)
  • E.W. Gifford

    Composition of California shellmounds

    University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology

    (1916)
  • D.K. Grayson

    Danger Cave, Last Supper Cave, and Hanging Rock Shelter: The faunas

    Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History

    (1988)
  • D.K. Grayson

    Bone transport, bone destruction, and reverse utility curves

    Journal of Archaeological Science

    (1989)
  • W.R. Hildebrandt et al.

    Evolution of marine mammal hunting: A view from the California and Oregon coasts

    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

    (1992)
  • T.L. Jones et al.

    Reasserting a prehistoric tragedy of the commons: Reply to Lyman

    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Coast-proximal inland archaeology and the Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis)

      2021, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      In archaeological contexts, evaluation of animal portions in terms of relative food utility as an indicator of transport has most often been conducted on large prey species such as ungulates that could not easily have been carried whole by hunter-gatherers. In contexts in which load weights were limited and animal portions had to be chosen for transport, high food value has often been prioritized (Binford, 1978; Bunn, 1986; Cannon, 2003; Faith, 2007; Klein, 1989; Meltzer et al., 2002; O’Connell et al., 1988; Perkins and Daly, 1968; Rogers and Broughton, 2001; Stiner, 1991). Processing and transport are likely to have been somewhat different considerations when prey animals were small and unlike larger prey could easily have been carried away from capture locations in their entirety.

    • Optimal Foraging Theory: Application and Inspiration in Human Endeavors Outside Biology

      2019, Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Second Edition: Volume 1-5
    • Biogenic control on the origin of a vertebrate monotypic accumulation from the Late Triassic of southern Brazil

      2015, Geobios
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on the first hypothesis, we should find skulls and jaws with some signs of abrasion and a high degree of fragmentation, both caused by impact of grains against their surface during hydraulic flow, which is actually not the case. On the other hand, fossil concentrations with no visible preferred spatial orientation of bioclasts in the matrix and predominance of cranial elements are generally explained as resulting from biogenic activity (predators or scavengers act on the carcasses causing bioclastic sorting; Badgley, 1986; Rogers and Broughton, 2001; Bertoni-Machado et al., 2008). According to Behrensmeyer (1991), the poor representation of postcranial elements in vertebrate accumulations results from preferential dispersion by predators/scavengers, as such bone elements are the most nutritious parts of the prey.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text