Special Issue ArticleMeaning and Credibility in Cheap-Talk Games
Abstract
I define neologism-proofness, a refinement of perfect Bayesian equilibrium in cheap-talk games. It applies when players have a preexisting common language, so that an unexpected message′s literal meaning is clear, and only credibility restricts communication. I show that certain implausible equilibria are not neologism-proof; in some games, no equilibrium is. Journal of Economic Literature classification numbers: D83 D82 C73.
References (0)
Cited by (244)
Fragile meaning - an experiment
2024, Journal of Economic TheoryAbsence of a shared language is an evident barrier to effective communication. Lack of common knowledge of what is shared is more insidious and a potential source of misunderstandings. We induce lack of common knowledge of a shared language in a sender-receiver game experiment by letting the availability of messages with focal meanings be uncertain. We consider an environment in which agents agree on the optimal action in every state of the world, there are equilibria in which messages with focal meanings are used in accordance with those meanings, and these equilibria maximize both sender and receiver payoffs. We do find, however, that these equilibria are fragile: Observed behavior aligns better with pooling equilibria, in which receivers ignore messages. This effect is more pronounced when the pooling action is optimal for a larger set of receiver beliefs.
Testing rational hypotheses in signaling games
2023, European Economic ReviewWe introduce a solution concept for signaling games, called Rational Hypothesis Testing Equilibrium (RHTE). Beliefs are updated via Ortoleva’s (2012) Hypothesis Testing model, allowing for conditioning on information sets off the path. Hypotheses are conjectures by the uninformed player about opponent’s strategies that rationalize sending an unexpected message. Each RHTE is a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium, but not vice versa. RHTE features a number of desirable properties: First, beliefs are structurally consistent in the spirit of Kreps and Wilson (1982). Second, beliefs are consistent with mutual knowledge of rationality. Third, RHTE can be related to the prominent refinement concepts, including the Intuitive Criterion, strategic stability, and undefeated equilibrium. In the Spence game, RHTE restricts the admissible wages, significantly reducing the number of equilibria. Finally, we show that our equilibrium notion offers an alternative explanation for the experimental results in Brandts and Holt (1992, 1993).
When to ask for an update: Timing in strategic communication
2023, Journal of Economic TheoryA principal (receiver) considers whether to accept a project whose total value depends on two aspects. In each period, an agent (sender) privately learns the value of one aspect with positive probability. We compare two common reporting protocols: frequent updating, which requires the sender to report in each period, and infrequent updating, which requires him to report only at the end of the learning process. The sender is biased towards acceptance; he may conceal his signal, but cannot otherwise misrepresent.
If the receiver would reject the project under the prior, then the equilibrium outcome is the same regardless of the updating frequency under certain regularity conditions. In contrast, if the project's prior expected value is sufficiently high, then updating frequency matters. Specifically, if it is sufficiently unlikely for the sender to be informed in a later period and the players' interests are sufficiently aligned, then frequent updating is better for the receiver since it encourages the sender to reveal provisionally unfavorable information early on. When it is sufficiently likely for the sender to be informed in a later period, however, infrequent updating is better for the receiver. Conditional delegation captures the benefits of both frequent and infrequent updating under high prior.
Equilibrium selection through forward induction in cheap talk games
2023, Games and Economic BehaviorThis paper provides a refinement that uniquely selects the ex-ante Pareto dominant equilibrium in a cheap talk game, provided one exists. The refinement works by embedding any cheap talk game into a class of two-stage games where: in stage 1 sender and receiver can, at a cost, alter their preferences; and in stage 2 the cheap talk game is played. For such games, we show that a forward induction logic can be invoked to select the ex-ante Pareto-dominant equilibrium in the second stage. Cheap talk games with exogenously fixed preferences are then treated as limiting cases of this larger class of games.
Strategic referrals and on-the-job search equilibrium
2023, Journal of Monetary EconomicsReferrals are prevalent in the U.S. labor market. To understand their aggregate effects, this paper studies an equilibrium model of on-the-job search and job referrals. In the model, referrals are modeled as a strategic interaction between a referrer and a firm. The equilibrium model shows that referrals benefit job searchers whose outside option is above a threshold. I support this prediction by showing that the referral wage premium exists only for employed job searchers. Quantitatively, referrals contribute to the total output by 3.93% through transmitting information and reducing search costs. The information transmission explains about 28% of the effects.
Informed principal problems in bilateral trading
2022, Journal of Economic TheoryWe study bilateral trade with interdependent values as an informed-principal problem. The mechanism-selection game has multiple equilibria that differ with respect to principal's payoff and trading surplus. We characterize the equilibrium that is worst for every type of principal, and characterize the conditions under which there are no equilibria with different payoffs for the principal. We also show that this is the unique equilibrium that survives the intuitive criterion.