Regular ArticleTHE SEC'S ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST AUDITORS: AN AUDITOR REPUTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL THEORY PERSPECTIVE
References (0)
Cited by (41)
Do non-audit service failures impair auditor reputation? An analysis of KPMG advisory service scandals in Germany
2024, Critical Perspectives on AccountingSustainability: leadership and reporting as its pillars
2022, Innovation and Sustainable Manufacturing: Research and DevelopmentFrom peer review to PCAOB inspections: Regulating for audit quality in the U.S.
2016, Journal of Accounting LiteratureCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, conclusions about the effect of external quality controls on audit quality were identified in various research studies. Empirical work on the former peer review system has applied alternative evaluation methods to assess whether reviewed firms provide higher audit quality than non-reviewed firms (Deis & Giroux, 1992; Krishnan & Schauer, 2000; O’Keefe et al., 1994; Rollins & Bremser, 1997). In contrast, research on the PCAOB inspections has used audit client-specific measures to evaluate the extent to which inspection contributes to audit quality (Abbott, Gunny, & Zhang, 2013; Carcello et al., 2011; Gramling, Krishnan, & Zhang, 2011; Gunny & Zhang, 2013; Offermanns & Peek, 2011).
The role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in a developing economy: Implications for IFRS
2014, Advances in AccountingCitation Excerpt :C5) Interviewees from the account preparers and user groups stress the usefulness of regulating professional bodies to improve the current enforcement mechanisms (Rollins & Bremser, 1997). These interviewees express concerns with the professional bodies and their role as regulator.
How individual auditor characteristics impact the likelihood of audit failure: Evidence from China
2014, Advances in Accounting'Does accounting regulation matter?': An experience of international financial reporting standards implementation in an emerging country
2014, Research in Accounting RegulationCitation Excerpt :These missing notices were hand-collected from the SEC office in Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 1647 documents were evaluated in this study, following the methodology of Feroz, Park, and Pastena (1991), Campbell and Parker (1992), Rollins and Bremser (1997), Chen, Firth, Gao, and Rui (2005) and Files (2012). In this section, the interview findings and documentary analyses are presented.
- f1
Address for correspondence: Professor W. Bremser, Villanova University, Dept of Accountancy, College of Commerce and Finance, 316 Bartley Hall, Villanova PA 19085 1678, U.S.A.