Regular Article
A histological reconstruction of dental development in the common chimpanzee,Pan troglodytes

https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1998.0248Get rights and content

Abstract

Much is known about the dental development ofPancompared with that for other extant great apes. The majority of information available has concentrated either on the emergence times of teeth or on the sequence of mineralization stages of the teeth as revealed from radiographs. However, the problems of defining stages of tooth formation sufficiently accurately on radiographs are only now becoming recognized. All of the data available to date suggest the presence of a more variable picture for the timing of mineralization stages in chimpanzees than for the timing of tooth emergence. In particular, arguments persist in the literature over the time of initial mineraliz-ation and the time it takes to form each anterior tooth crown in chimpanzees. Therefore we attempt to provide a more precise chronological time scale for dental development in our closest living relative. Furthermore, we examine the sequence of molar cusp formation relative to enamel formation times related specifically to those cusps and to try to tie these data in with information from functional studies of molar crowns. Histological sections of 14 maxillary and 28 mandibular teeth from four chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) individuals and three molar teeth from three chimpanzees of unknown origin were prepared in accordance with a well-established protocol. By combining data on short-period and long-period incremental lines (including daily secretion rates, periodicity, prism lengths and enamel thickness) in both enamel and dentine, we reconstruct times for the onset and duration of crown formation as well as construct a schedule for the pattern and timing of dental development in this one hominoid species. Interestingly, our histologically-derived data confirms that the data from radiographic studies underestimate crown formation times by the following amounts for each tooth type: I12·5 years, I23·1 years, C 1·6 years, P31·9 years, P40·1 years, M10·8 years, M21·1 years and M30·3 years. When combined with data on gingival emergence, it seems that chimpanzee teeth have a greatly reduced time for root growth before emergence occurs and that the major differences betweenHomo sapiensandPanlie in the first part of the root formation rather than in the total period of crown formation. Maxillary and mandibular molar functional cusps take longer to complete enamel formation to the cervix than any other cusp in that same tooth, which makes sense as these cusps are thick enamelled. These results suggest that new links can be made between developmental aspects, occlusal morphology and tooth function.

References (0)

Cited by (127)

  • Patterns of permanent incisor, canine and molar development in modern humans, great apes and early fossil hominins

    2022, Archives of Oral Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Radiographic studies of tooth development in great apes have provided further information about the sequence of crown and root formation stages both prior to and after gingival emergence (Anemone et al., 1991; Boughner et al., 2012; Boughner et al., 2015; Dean & Wood, 1981; Winkler et al., 1991) and when the chronological age of individuals has been known it has been possible to put a time scale to radiographically defined stages of tooth development in great apes (Anemone et al., 1996; Kralick et al., 2017; Kuykendall, 1996). Besides these radiographic studies, histological studies have provided yet more evidence for the chronology of crown and root formation stages in developing great ape dentitions (Beynon et al., 1991; Dean, 2010; Kelley & Schwartz, 2010; Reid et al., 1998; Schwartz & Dean, 2001; Schwartz et al., 2006; Smith, 2016; Smith et al., 2007). An unresolved issue arising from radiographic and histological comparisons of modern human and great ape dentitions is to what degree there is overlap in the development of M1 and M2 crown formation and of M2 and M3 crown formation and whether this relates simply to differential tooth size, space in the jaws and/or jaw growth (Boughner & Dean, 2004; Simpson et al., 1992; Tompkins, 1996a, 1996b).

  • Distinguishing primate taxa with enamel incremental variables

    2022, Journal of Human Evolution
    Citation Excerpt :

    Counts of Retzius lines and their periodicity can be used to determine the duration of imbricational enamel growth (Reid et al., 1998a). The duration of cuspal enamel growth can be quantified by dividing the enamel thickness by the mean cuspal DSR (Reid et al., 1998a; Smith, 2008), and the time taken to form the cuspal enamel can be combined with the imbricational enamel to estimate the duration of cusp-specific formation (e.g., protoconid, metaconid). The timing of initiation, duration, and crown completion differ across cusps, therefore calculating time for each cusp is necessary (Smith et al., 2007a; Antoine et al., 2009).

View all citing articles on Scopus

J. Moggi-Cecchi

f1

Address correspondence to: Dr Gary T. Schwartz, Evolutionary Anatomy Unit, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, University College London, Rockefeller Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, U.K. Tel.: +11-44-171-209-6155; Fax: +11-44-171-209-0346; E-mail:[email protected]

View full text