Elsevier

Journal of Phonetics

Volume 25, Issue 2, April 1997, Pages 169-186
Journal of Phonetics

Regular Article
Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2

https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0040Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if variation in amount of native language (L1) use influences second language (L2) production accuracy. Native English-speaking listeners auditorily evaluated short English sentences that had been spoken by a group of native English monolinguals and by the subjects in two native Italian (NI) groups. The subjects in the NI groups were matched according to their age of immigration to Canada from Italy (5.9vs.5.6 years), but differed according to self-reported use of Italian (36%vs.3%). The subjects in both NI groups were found to speak English with detectable foreign accents even though they began learning English as children and had spoken English for 34 years on average. The NI subjects who spoke Italian relatively often had significantly stronger foreign accents than those who seldom spoke Italian. These findings challenge the view that ultimate success in pronouncing an L2 is determined solely by an individual's state of neurological development at the time of first exposure to the L2. It appears that the degree of activation of the L1 or the strength of its representations may also influence L2 production accuracy.

References (0)

Cited by (226)

  • Exposure to speech via foreign film and its effects on non-native vowel production and perception

    2022, Journal of Phonetics
    Citation Excerpt :

    With these broad directions in mind, the main question in the foreground of the present research concerns the types of exposure and training that can help L2 learners improve their pronunciation and comprehension in an efficient way. Previous research on the development of second language speech overwhelmingly shows that exposure to authentic native speaker input is key for attaining target-like pronunciation and perception of non-native speech (Flege, 2007, 2009, 2018; Flege et al., 1997; Flege et al., 1995; MacKay et al., 2001; inter alia). While the role of input seems crucial for interlanguage development, it is not always achievable for some L2 learners.

  • Language input effects on children's words and vowels: An accent categorization and rating study

    2022, Language Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    The results of the mixed effects models in Experiment 1 and 2 showed that those bilingual children who received a large amount of input in their other language sounded more accented than monolingual children and bilinguals with mostly German input. This is in line with previous studies that found an effect of the amount of other language input on bilinguals’ productions of words (children: Uzal et al., 2015; Wrembel et al., 2019; adults: Flege et al., 1997; Piske and MacKay, 1999; Piske et al., 2001, 2002; Flege et al., 2003). The results suggest that the sound systems of the other languages influence the German sound categories, leading to audible differences between these children and children who receive less input in other languages.

View all citing articles on Scopus
f1

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Speech and Hearing, School of Health Related Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, VH 503, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019, U.S.A.

View full text