Abstract
Predator—prey relationships involving rabbits and hares are widely studied at a long-term population level, while the short-term ethological interactions between one predator and one prey are less well documented. We use a physiologically-based model of hare behavior, developed in the framework of artificial intelligence studies, to analyse its sophisticated anti-predatory behavior. The hares use to stand to the fox in order to inform it that its potential prey is alerted. The behavior of the hare is characterized by specific standing and flushing distances. We show that both hare survival probability and body condition depend on habitat cover, as well as on the ability of the predator to approach—undetected—a prey. We study two anti-predatory strategies, one based on the maximization of the survival probability and the other on the maximization of the body conditions of the hare. Despite the fact that the two strategies are not independent, they are characterized by quite different behavioral patterns. Field estimates of flushing and standing distances are consistent with survival maximization. There exists an optimal anti-predatory strategy, characterized by a flushing distance of 20 m and a standing distance of 30 m, which is optimal in a large set of environmental conditions with a sharp fitness advantage with respect to suboptimal strategies. These results improve our understanding of the anti-predatory behavior of the hare and lend credibility to the optimality approach in the behavioral analysis, showing that even for complex organisms, characterized by a large network of internal constraints and feedback, it is possible to identify simple optimal strategies with a large potential for selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelstam, P., E. R. Lindtröm and P. Widèn (1985). Synchronous short-term population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia—occurrence and distribution. Holartic Ecol. 8, 285–298.
Arditi, R. and B. Dacorogna (1988). Optimal foraging on arbitrary food distributions and the definition of habitat patches. Am. Nat. 131, 837–846.
Arditi, R. and L. R. Ginzburg (1989). Coupling in predator—prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 311–326.
Artois, M. and A. Le Gall (1988). Le Renard, Paris: Hatier.
Berger, U., G. Wagner and W. F. Wolff (1999). Virtual biologists observe virtual grasshoppers: an assessment of different mobility parameters for the analysis of movement patterns. Ecol. Model. 115, 119–227.
Berryman, A. A. (1992). The origin and evolution of predator—prey theory. Ecology 73, 1530–1535.
Caro, T. M. (1986). The function of stotting: a review of hypotheses. Am. Nat. 34, 649–662.
Coulson, R. N., L. J. Folse and D. K. Loh (1987). Artificial intelligence and natural resource management. Science 237, 262–267.
Farnsworth, K. D. and K. J. Niklas (1995). Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Funct. Ecol. 9, 355–363.
Ferron, J. and J. P. Ouellet (1992). Daily partitioning of summer habitat and use of space by the snowshoe hare in southern boreal forest. Can. J. Zool. 70, 2178–2183.
Flux, J. E. C. (1970). Life history of the mountain hare (Lepus timidus scoticus) in northeast Scotland. J. Zool., London 161, 75–123.
Folse, L. J., J. M. Packard and W. E. Grant (1989). AI modelling of animal movements in a heterogeneous habitat. Ecol. Model. 46, 57–72.
Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: acritique to the adaptationist program. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 205, 581–598.
Holley, A. J. F. (1993). Do brown hares signals to foxes? Ethology 94, 21–30.
Larkin, S. and D. McFarland (1978). The cost of changing from one activity to another. Anim. Behav. 26, 1237–1246.
Lindström, E. R., H. Andrén, P. Angelstam and P. Widèn (1986). Influence of predators on hare populations in Sweden: a critical review. Mam. Rev. 16, 151–156.
Lindström, E. R., H. Andrèn, P. Angelstam, G. Cederlund, B. Hörnfeldt, L. Jäderberg, P. A. Lemnell, B. Martinsson, K. Sköld and J. E. Swenson (1994). Disease reveals the predator: sarcoptic mange, red fox predation and prey populations. Ecology 75, 1942–1049.
Litvaitis, J., J. A. Sherburne and J. A. Bissonette (1985). Influence of understory characteristics on snowshoe hare habitat use and density. J. Wildl. Manage. 49, 866–873.
Lloyd, H. G. (1980). The Red Fox, London: BT Batsford LTD.
Łomnicki, A. (1999). Individual-based models and theindividual-based approach to population ecology. Ecol. Model. 115, 191–198.
Mangel, M. and C. W. Clark (1988). Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology, Princeton: Monographs in behavior and ecology, Princeton University Press.
McFarland, D. and A. Houston (1981). Quantitative Ethology—The State Space Approach, London: Pitman Press.
McFarland, D. and T. Bösser (1993). Intelligent Behavior in Animal and Robots, Cambridge: A Bradford Book, MIT Press.
Odum, E. P. (1959). Foundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Österholm, H. (1964). The significance of distance receptors in the feeding behaviour of the fox, Vulpes vulpes L.. Acta Zool. Fenn. 106, 1–31.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (1995). The Dynamic Nature of Ecosystems. Chaos and Order Entwined, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Pépin, D. (1989). Variation in survival of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) leverets from different farmland areas in the Paris basin. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 13–23.
Rizzotto, M. and S. Focardi (1997). A physiologically-based model of a self-motivated hare in relation to its ecology. Ecol. Model. 95, 191–209.
Rich, E. and K. Knight (1991). Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saarenmaa, H., N. D. Stone, L. J. Folse, J. M. Packard, W. E. Grant, M. E. Makela and R. N. Coulson (1988). An artificial intelligence modelling approach to simulating animal/habitat interactions. Ecol. Model. 44, 125–141.
Servin, J., J. R. Rau and M. Delibes (1991). Activity pattern of the red fox. Vulpes vulpes, in Doñana, SW Spain. Acta Ther. 36, 369–373.
Sinclair, A. R. E. (1986). Testing multi-factor causes of population limitation: an illustration using snowshoe hares. Oikos 47, 360–364.
Stephens, D. W. and J. R. Krebs (1986). Foraging Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weber, J. M., J. J. Meia and S. Aubry (1994). Activity pattern of foxes. Vulpes vulpes, in the swiss Jura mountains. Z. Säuget. 59, 9–13.
Windberg, L. A. and L. B. Keith (1976). Snowshoe hare population response to artificial high densities. J. Mamm. 57, 523–553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Focardi, S., Rizzotto, M. Optimal strategies and complexity: A theoretical analysis of the anti-predatory behavior of the hare. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 829–848 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0114
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1999.0114