Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

available in

Background

Pelvimetry assesses the size of a woman's pelvis aiming to predict whether she will be able to deliver or not. This can be done by clinical examination, or by conventional x‐rays, computerised tomography scanning, or magnetic resonance imaging.

Objectives

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of pelvimetry (performed antenatally, intrapartum or postpartum) on the method of delivery, and on perinatal mortality and morbidity, and on maternal morbidity.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (27 June 2007).

Selection criteria

Acceptably randomised comparisons of the use of pelvimetry in cephalic presentations.

Data collection and analysis

One author assessed trial quality and extracted the data.

Main results

Four trials of over 1000 women were included. All used x‐ray pelvimetry to assess the pelvis. The trials were generally not of good quality. Women undergoing x‐ray pelvimetry were more likely to be delivered by caesarean section (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.63 to 2.88). No significant impact was detected on perinatal outcome.

Authors' conclusions

There is not enough evidence to support the use of x‐ray pelvimetry in women whose fetuses have a cephalic presentation.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term

Too little evidence to show whether measuring the size of the woman's pelvis (pelvimetry) is beneficial when the baby is in a cephalic position.

Sometimes, a pregnant woman or her caregiver might be worried that the pelvic bones might be too small for the baby to pass through during birth. Pelvimetry measures pelvic size using x‐ray, computerised tomography scanning or magnetic resonance imaging. For women whose baby is in a head down (cephalic) position, the review of trials found too little evidence to show whether pelvimetry is beneficial. There is some evidence that women having pelvimetry are more likely have a caesarean section, but there are no trials that show whether this is beneficial for the baby.