Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

available in

Background

Alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose or miglitol, have the potential to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The true value of these agents, especially in relation to diabetes related mortality and morbidity, has never been investigated in a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis.

Objectives

To assess the effects of alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Search methods

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, LILACS, databases of ongoing trials, reference lists of reviews on the topic of alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors and we contacted experts and manufacturers for additional trials.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials of at least 12 weeks duration comparing alpha‐glucosidase inhibitor monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes with any other intervention and that included at least one of the following outcomes: mortality, morbidity, quality of life, glycemic control, lipids, insulin levels, body weight, adverse events.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers read all abstracts, assessed quality and extracted data independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or by the judgement of a third reviewer. A statistician checked all extracted data entrance in the database. We attempted to contact all authors for data clarification.

Main results

We included 41 trials (8130 participants), 30 investigated acarbose, seven miglitol, one trial voglibose and three trials compared different alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors. Study duration was 24 weeks in most cases and only two studies lasted amply longer than one year. We found only few data on mortality, morbidity and quality of life. Acarbose had a clear effect on glycemic control compared to placebo: glycated haemoglobin ‐0.8% (95% confidence interval ‐0.9 to ‐0.7), fasting blood glucose ‐1.1 mmol/L (95% confidence interval ‐1.4 to ‐0.9), post‐load blood glucose ‐2.3 mmol/L (95% confidence interval ‐2.7 to ‐1.9). The effect on glycated haemoglobin by acarbose was not dose‐dependent. We found a decreasing effect on post‐load insulin and no clinically relevant effects on lipids or body weight. Adverse effects were mostly of gastro‐intestinal origin and dose dependent. Compared to sulphonylurea, acarbose decreased fasting and post‐load insulin levels by ‐24.8 pmol/L (95% confidence interval ‐43.3 to ‐6.3) and ‐133.2 pmol/L (95% confidence interval ‐184.5 to ‐81.8) respectively and acarbose caused more adverse effects.

Authors' conclusions

It remains unclear whether alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors influence mortality or morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Conversely, they have a significant effect on glycemic control and insulin levels, but no statistically significant effect on lipids and body weight. These effects are less sure when alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors are used for a longer duration. Acarbose dosages higher than 50 mg TID offer no additional effect on glycated hemoglobin but more adverse effects instead. Compared to sulphonylurea, alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors lower fasting and post‐load insulin levels and have an inferior profile regarding glycemic control and adverse effects.

Plain language summary

Alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors may be used for patients with type 2 diabetes. They delay the absorbance of carbohydrates ('complex form of sugar') in the gut. In this review we present data from meta‐analyses that show (among other things) a decrease in glycated haemoglobin, fasting and post‐load blood glucose and post‐load insulin. But we found no evidence for an effect on mortality or morbidity. We found clues that with higher dosages the effect on glycated haemoglobin, in contrast to post‐load blood glucose, remains the same. This might be because a lower compliance due to increasing side‐effects.