Open Access, Peer-reviewed
pISSN 1229-845X
eISSN 1976-555X
    J Vet Sci. 2013 Dec;14(4):449-456. English.
    Published online Dec 19, 2013.
    https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2013.14.4.449
    © 2013 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science.
    Original Article

    Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of multi-drug resistant Staphylococci in healthy cats and dogs

    Paola Gandolfi-Decristophoris,1,2,3 Gertraud Regula,4 Orlando Petrini,1 Jakob Zinsstag,2,3 and Esther Schelling2,3
      • 1Cantonal Institute of Microbiology, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
      • 2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
      • 3Faculty of Science, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
      • 4Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, 3097 Berne, Switzerland.
    • Corresponding author: Tel: +41-918572305; Email: paola.decristophoris@gmail.com
    Received December 26, 2011; Revised March 06, 2012; Accepted October 23, 2012.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    We investigated the distribution of commensal staphylococcal species and determined the prevalence of multi-drug resistance in healthy cats and dogs. Risk factors associated with the carriage of multi-drug resistant strains were explored. Isolates from 256 dogs and 277 cats were identified at the species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry. The diversity of coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) was high, with 22 species in dogs and 24 in cats. Multi-drug resistance was frequent (17%) and not always associated with the presence of the mecA gene. A stay in a veterinary clinic in the last year was associated with an increased risk of colonisation by multi-drug resistant Staphylococci (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1~5.2, p value LRT = 0.04). When identifying efficient control strategies against antibiotic resistance, the presence of mechanisms other than methicillin resistance and the possible role of CNS in the spread of resistance determinants should be considered.

    Keywords
    antibiotics; coagulase-negative; matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight; staphylococci

    Introduction

    Staphylococci resistant against methicillin and other antibiotics have frequently been reported in pets [5, 27]. These microorganisms are opportunistic pathogens that may colonise the skin and mucosae of humans and other animals. Staphylococcus is currently divided into coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative species. The pathogenicity of coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) has long been underestimated because they were associated with more chronic or subacute infections when compared to coagulase-positive Staphylococci (CPS) [20]. However, the etiological role of CNS in prosthesis and foreign body infections is increasingly being recognised in human medicine [12, 13, 23]. In pets, the pathogenic potential of these microorganisms has not yet been clearly recognized, although there have been some reports of infections related to methicillin-resistant CNS in cats and dogs [11, 24].

    Few studies have addressed the composition of staphylococcal populations on the mucosae of healthy cats and dogs [8, 9]. Previous investigations of the staphylococcal species diversity in these animals have focused on clinical isolates [34], mainly CPS [17], or described the distribution of well defined antibiotic resistance within a limited number of staphylococcal species [1, 38]. However, these studies were carried out before 2005, when Staphylococcus (S.) pseudintermedius had not yet been described. In fact, this species had probably been reported in all previous studies as S. intermedius, leading to confusion regarding its actual occurrence in pets [14, 21, 22, 29, 30]. S. pseudintermedius has recently been suggested as the most relevant and prevalent CPS dog coloniser, and there have been increasing reports on its pathogenicity and methicillin resistance [15].

    To date, CNS strains in pets has been neglected; however, the recent development of new molecular techniques has allowed accurate identification of CNS [3, 31], which will eventually lead to a better understanding of these bacterial species. Additional knowledge regarding CNS carriage in animals will be of benefit, because these bacteria might represent a pool of antibiotic resistance for CPS species. Indeed, horizontal gene transfer of staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) between CPS and CNS species has been documented [19].

    In the last decade, several authors have suggested that pets may be reservoirs of antibiotic resistant bacteria [18, 25, 26]. This assumption was mainly based on studies reporting antibiotic resistance in clinical CPS isolates from dogs and humans in close contact [28, 37]. However, a clear picture of the distribution, diversity and multi-drug resistance of both CPS and CNS species in pets is lacking, as is the role of cats and dogs as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance.

    The purpose of the present study was to gain insight into the distribution of commensal staphylococcal species of healthy cats and dogs and determine the occurrence of multi-drug resistance in both CNS and CPS. We also explored risk factors associated with the carriage of these microorganisms by pets.

    Materials and Methods

    Study design and settings

    Samples were collected between March 2008 and December 2009 from four different Swiss cantons (Berne, Ticino, Vaud and Zurich). Only healthy pets with no overt acute disease at the time of sample collection were enrolled in the study. The pets either lived in or visited nursing homes for pet-therapy or lived in households. The selection strategy differed between community and nursing homes. Pets in the community were included in the study based on convenience sampling in households (n = 196) in four Swiss cantons representing the northern, southern, central and western part of Switzerland. Additional pets (n = 239) were recruited from cats and dogs visiting a total of 12 veterinary practices in the same regions for routine vaccinations. Nursing homes were selected by two-stage random cluster sampling from an exhaustive list of nursing homes located in the four Swiss cantons as reported in [16]. In randomly selected nursing homes, all pets matching the inclusion criteria and present at the time of sample collection (n = 98) were enrolled in the study. Informed written consent was obtained from all pet owners prior to the start of the study, and the investigation received the approval for animal experimentation from the Cantonal and Swiss Federal Veterinary Offices (authorisation reference No. 01/2008-02/2008).

    Sample collection

    Nasal and ear swab samples were collected using cotton swabs (Amies agar gel 108C and 110C; Copan, Italy) that had been soaked in a physiological 9% NaCl solution. For collection, a swab was introduced 1~2 cm in the nostril, while a second swab was introduced as deeply as possible in the ear channel of each animal. The collected samples were then stored in transport medium at room temperature and analyzed for the presence of Staphylococci within 24~48 h of collection. A questionnaire collecting information regarding the demographic and health status of the pets was filled in by the owners (available on request).

    Sample analyses

    Both swabs were streaked onto Mannitol Salt Agar (Chapman 2 - MSA 2; bioMérieux, France), after which they were incubated for 48 h at 37℃, enriched in MRSA broth supplemented with 6 µg of oxacilllin (48 h at 37℃) and cultured on Gelose ChromID S. aureus (SAID; bioMérieux) for 48 h at 37℃. All morphologically different colonies were isolated and catalase positive, Gram positive coccal bacteria were frozen in skim milk at -℃ until further analyses.

    Isolates were grown on blood agar for 24 h and then identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using an Axima Confidence spectrometer (Shimadzu-Biotech, Japan) in positive linear mode (m/z = 2,000 to 20,000) [10]. The identity of isolates that could not be identified by MALDI-TOF MS (24%) was confirmed by sequencing of the amplified partial rpoB gene [31].

    Phenotypic antibiotic resistance to 24 different drugs was assessed by the Kirby-Bauer method on Mueller-Hinton blood agar (MHS2; bioMérieux). The following antibiotics were tested: penicillin (10 units), ampicillin (10 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), cefazolin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25 + 23.75 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (20 + 10 µg), ceftazidim (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), rifampicin (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), doxycyclin (30 µg), mupirocin (5 µg), linezolid (30 µg) and quinopristin-dalfopristin (15 µg). An inducible clindamycin resistance test ("D-zone" test) was also carried out for all isolates. Results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [4, 32], and intermediate results were classified as resistant. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least three drugs belonging to three different antibiotic classes [16]. Additionally, the presence of the mecA gene, which confers methicillin resistance, was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on all isolates that showed phenotypic resistance to oxacillin [6, 7]. We considered isolates from the same animal as being different strains if they belonged to different staphylococcal species or their phenotypic antibiotic resistance profiles differed.

    Statistical analyses

    Sample size calculation was based on the assumption that 5% of pets carried at least one MDR staphylococcal strain and that the intra-class correlation coefficient (rho) in these settings was 0.15. We used the cluster sample equation developed by Bennett et al. [2] for all sample size calculations. Assuming that each nursing home with pets owned or was visited by three animals on average, sample collection in 42 different nursing homes would have provided 126 pets. Accordingly, the expected precision for the prevalence estimate of MDR in pets would have a standard error of 2.2%, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68~9.3%.

    The characteristics of the cats and dogs were compared to check for consistent differences in the demographics and health status of the different populations sampled. A Chi-square test (Fisher's exact test when expected observations < 5) and 95% CI were used for this comparison. We reported the prevalence of Staphylococci and MDR Staphylococci and the distribution of antibiotic resistance among different staphylococcal species together with the median number of resistances to different antibiotic classes. Univariable logistic regression models with MDR staphylococcal carriage status of the pet as the outcome variable of interest were applied to explore risk factors. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR with 95% CI) were calculated as a measure of association. Statistical significance of each explanatory variable was determined by a likelihood-ratio test (LRT). We included in a multivariable model all variables with LRT p values ≤ 0.2 from the univariable analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 9.0 (Stata Corporation, USA).

    Results

    Demographics and staphylococcal carriage in pets

    We collected samples from 533 healthy pets (277 cats and 256 dogs), 98 of which lived in or visited nursing homes at least once a week and 435 that lived in the community. The demographics of the two populations studied are reported in Table 1. Parameters such as sex, age, sterilisation, otitis in the last year, and antibiotic treatment showed different distributions between the nursing home and community settings, but the 95% CI estimates of these parameters overlapped (Table 1). We did not carry out stratified analyses of the samples because the overall frequencies of MDR in nursing homes (15/98) and in the community (76/435) did not differ significantly (χ2 = 0.27, p = 0.6).

    Table 1
    Demographics of investigated cats and dogs

    Staphylococci were detected in 60% (320/533) of pets, and 17% (92/533) of all animals carried at least one MDR strain. There were no significant differences in MDR carriage between pet species [14.8% (95% CI: 11.0~19.5) in cats and 20.0% (95% CI: 15.5~25.4) in dogs; χ2 = 2.1, p = 0.14] (Table 2). In cats, most CNS were MDR (39/41), whereas the proportion of MDR in CPS was small (1/41). Conversely, MDR CPS (20/51) and MDR CNS (28/51) carriage was almost equal in dogs (Table 2). Additionally, we observed species-specific differences (χ2 = 63.69, p < 0.001) in the proportion of S. pseudintermedius carriage, with 27% (70/256) of dogs and 3% of cats (8/277) harbouring this species. No difference in S. aureus carriage was observed between the two pet species (13/256 dogs and 14/277 cats, respectively).

    Table 2
    Proportion of staphylococcal and MDR staphylococcal carriage in cats and dogs

    Staphylococcal isolates

    We isolated 284 staphylococcal strains (176 from the nostrils and 108 from the ears) from dogs and 300 (153 from the nostrils and 147 from the ears) from cats (Table 3). We were able to identify 94.5% (552/584) of all isolates at the species level. Two S. schleiferi isolates from two cats were identified only at the species level. CNS species accounted for 60% (172/284) of all isolates in dogs and 86% (258/300) in cats (Table 3).

    Table 3
    Staphylococci in nostrils and ears of dogs (N = 256) and cats (N = 277) and their antibiotic resistance profiles

    In cats, the total number of CPS strains was lower (22/300) than in dogs (98/284). Among the CPS strains, S. pseudintermedius was more frequently isolated from dogs [(85/98), 87%] than from cats [(8/22), 36%], whereas S. aureus was more frequent in cats [(14/22), 63%] than dogs [(13/98), 13%]. No other CPS were isolated.

    The diversity of CNS was high, with 22 different species in dogs and 24 in cats (Table 3). S. felis was only isolated from cats, in particular from their nostrils, and it represented 31% of all CNS isolates (41/132). Other CNS recovered in relevant proportions from both pets were S. epidermidis, S. warneri, S. hominis, S. xylosus and S. equorum (Table 3)

    Antibiotic resistance

    The mecA gene was present in 6% (11/172) of dog and 3% (7/258) of cat isolates. We did not recover any MDR S. aureus (Table 3). MDR, with a few strains showing resistance to eight different antibiotic classes, was detected in bacteria at proportions of 21% (36/172) in dogs and 16% (42/258) in cats. MDR was observed in S. pseudintermedius isolated from both pet species with resistance to up to six different antibiotic classes, but no methicillin resistance was seen (Table 3).

    About 50% of all isolates in dogs and 30% in cats showed phenotypic resistance to penicillin and ampicillin (Table 4). Fusidic acid and erythromycin resistance were detected in 31% and 25% of dog and 28% and 19% of cat isolates, respectively. Additionally, 15% of all strains isolated from dogs were resistant to tetracycline and 11% to kanamycin. Clindamycin resistance was reported from 16% of dog and 15% of cat isolates (Table 4).

    Table 4
    In vitro antibiotic resistance of the isolates investigated

    Exploratory analysis of risk factors

    Univariable exploratory analysis revealed that a stay in a veterinary clinic in the last year was associated with increased risk of colonisation by MDR Staphylococci (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1~5.2, p value LRT = 0.04; Table 5). We included species, canton, stay in veterinary clinic in the last year, and antibiotic treatment in the last 3 months in the multivariable analysis. No missing data for these variables was observed for all 465 records. When accounting for other variables, we observed an influence of the cantons (geographic origin) on the carriage of MDR Staphylococci (p value LRT = 0.02). Additionally, cats had a lower risk of being carriers of MDR Staphylococci, whereas a stay in a veterinary clinic in the last year and antibiotic treatment in the last 3 months were associated with a higher risk, although these differences were not statistically significant (Table 5).

    Table 5
    Risk factors for cats and dogs to be carriers of MDR Staphylococci

    Discussion

    This study provides detailed information on staphylococcal carriage in healthy cats and dogs and on drug resistance of these bacteria to different antibiotic classes for the first time since the description of S. pseudintermedius. We showed that S. pseudintermedius was recovered from the mucosae of healthy dogs more frequently than from those of healthy cats. Previous hospitalisation (at least one night in a veterinary clinic) was a risk factor for the carriage of MDR Staphylococci in pets using the univariable approach. The multivariable model showed that geographical distribution of the animals in the four cantons had an influence on the carriage of MDR staphylococci, which might reflect different pet health care and prescription practices of veterinarians in different regions of Switzerland.

    Identification of the Staphylococci was carried out by MALDI-TOF MS, which provides reliable and rapid identification of the taxa in the S. intermedius group (S. delphini, S. intermedius and S. pseudintermedius) [10]. Previous investigations of the staphylococcal population of the mucosae of cats and dogs were based on phenotypic characterisation of the isolates, which may have led to misidentification of some closely related staphylococcal species [22, 39].

    We isolated MDR staphylococcal strains from healthy cats and dogs; however, MDR was not always associated with the presence of the mecA gene. In this study, resistance of strains to different antibiotic classes ranged from very low proportions (e.g., 1~2% resistance to ciprofloxacin in cats and dogs) to high values (11%) for kanamycin resistance in dogs. Methicillin resistance is of particular interest, because it confers resistance to all beta-lactams and is also often linked to resistance to other antibiotic classes; however, other resistances are also relevant in clinical settings, and infections resulting from MDR opportunistic pathogens are a critical problem to clinicians because they limit the choice of active antibiotic treatments [36].

    It should be noted that our study has some limitations. Specifically, the exploratory analysis of risk factors was carried out by combining all staphylococcal species and information on pet-therapy animals as well as household pets, even though the risk associated with the carriage of MDR Staphylococci belonging to several species might differ between groups. This approach was necessary because the numbers for given combinations of investigated risk factors and animals carrying different MDR staphylococcal species were small. Pet management factors in the three months preceding the study were reported by the owners; therefore, a recall bias might be present. However, we do not consider this potential bias to be important because one can reasonably expect pet owners to recall whether or not a pet had visited a veterinary clinic during the preceding three months. We did not collect data on the number of different antibiotic treatments and the length of treatments, and the analysis of these data might have revealed other risk factors. In addition, we defined MDR as resistance of a strain to at least three antibiotics of different classes. Official guidelines (e.g., CLSI and EUCAST) lack a clear and standard criteria to define a staphylococcal strain as MDR, which reduces the possibility of carrying out meaningful comparisons with published data [16]. Despite the limitations of an exploratory univariable approach, our results confirm findings from published studies regarding factors associated with the carriage of MDR Staphylococci in pets, and in particular, the importance of previous hospitalisation, which was already reported as a risk factor for acquisition of both MRSA and MRSP in pets [33, 35].

    Our study has shown that carriage of multi-drug resistant Staphylococci in healthy cats and dogs is common; thus, clinical therapy guidelines would benefit from an approach that is not only focused on methicillin resistance, neglecting the presence of other resistances. The monitoring of antibiotics use in veterinary clinics could provide an overview of possible future trends of antibiotic resistance in pets. In veterinary medicine, further studies investigating the dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants would benefit from considering the possible role of reservoirs of CNS in their spread.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the staff of the Istituto cantonale di microbiologia for help with laboratory analyses and providing assistance with collection. The Swiss Federal Veterinary Office (BVET) provided financial support for this study (Grant No. 1.06.12).

    References

      1. Bagcigil FA, Moodley A, Baptiste KE, Jensen VF, Guardabassi L. Occurrence, species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and clonality of methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant staphylococci in the nasal cavity of domestic animals. Vet Microbiol 2007;121:307–315.
      1. Bennett S, Woods T, Liyanage WM, Smith DL. A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. World Health Stat Q 1991;44:98–106.
      1. Carbonnelle E, Beretti JL, Cottyn S, Quesne G, Berche P, Nassif X, Ferroni A. Rapid identification of staphylococci isolated in clinical microbiology laboratories by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2156–2161.
      1. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Nineteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S19. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009.
      1. Cohn LA, Middleton JR. A veterinary perspective on methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2010;20:31–45.
      1. Cotter L, Lynch M, Cryan B, Greer P, Fanning S. Investigation of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak in an Irish hospital: triplex PCR and DNA amplification fingerprinting. J Hosp Infect 1997;36:37–47.
      1. Couto I, Sanches IS, Sá-Leão R, de Lencastre H. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus sciuri strains isolated from humans. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1136–1143.
      1. Cox HU, Hoskins JD, Newman SS, Foil CS, Turnwald GH, Roy AF. Temporal study of staphylococcal species on healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:747–751.
      1. Cox HU, Hoskins JD, Newman SS, Turnwald GH, Foil CS, Roy AF, Kearney MT. Distribution of staphylococcal species on clinically healthy cats. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:1824–1828.
      1. Decristophoris P, Fasola A, Benagli C, Tonolla M, Petrini O. Identification of Staphylococcus intermedius Group by MALDI-TOF MS. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011;34:45–51.
      1. van Duijkeren E, Box ATA, Heck MEOC, Wannet WJB, Fluit AC. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from animals. Vet Microbiol 2004;103:91–97.
      1. von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2:677–685.
      1. von Eiff C, Proctor RA, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: pathogens have major role in nosocomial infections; hospitalized patients with indwelling foreign bodies and those who are immunocompromised are particularly at risk. Postgrad Med 2001;110:63–76.
      1. Fazakerley J, Nuttall T, Sales D, Schmidt V, Carter SD, Hart CA, McEwan NA. Staphylococcal colonization of mucosal and lesional skin sites in atopic and healthy dogs. Vet Dermatol 2009;20:179–184.
      1. Fitzgerald JR. The Staphylococcus intermedius group of bacterial pathogens: species re-classification, pathogenesis and the emergence of meticillin resistance. Vet Dermatol 2009;20:490–495.
      1. Gandolfi-Decristophoris P, De Benedetti A, Petignat C, Attinger M, Guillaume J, Fiebig L, Hattendorf J, Cernela n, Regula G, Petrini O, Zinsstag J, Schelling E. Evaluation of pet contact as a risk factor for carriage of multidrug-resistant staphylococci in nursing home residents. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:128–133.
      1. Griffeth GC, Morris DO, Abraham JL, Shofer FS, Rankin SC. Screening for skin carriage of methicillin-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin. Vet Dermatol 2008;19:142–149.
      1. Guardabassi L, Schwarz S, Lloyd DH. Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:321–332.
      1. Hanssen AM, Ericson Sollid JU. SCCmec in staphylococci: genes on the move. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006;46:8–20.
      1. Huebner J, Goldmann DA. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu Rev Med 1999;50:223–236.
      1. Igimi S, Atobe H, Tohya Y, Inoue A, Takahashi E, Konishi S. Characterization of the most frequently encountered Staphylococcus sp. in cats. Vet Microbiol 1994;39:255–260.
      1. Jousson O, Di Bello D, Vanni M, Cardini G, Soldani G, Pretti C, Intorre L. Genotypic versus phenotypic identification of staphylococcal species of canine origin with special reference to Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans. Vet Microbiol 2007;123:238–244.
      1. Kloos WE, Bannerman TL. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 1994;7:117–140.
      1. Litster A, Moss SM, Honnery M, Rees B, Trott DJ. Prevalence of bacterial species in cats with clinical signs of lower urinary tract disease: recognition of Staphylococcus felis as a possible feline urinary tract pathogen. Vet Microbiol 2007;121:182–188.
      1. Lloyd DH. Reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance in pet animals. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45 Suppl 2:S148–S152.
      1. Loeffler A, Lloyd DH. Companion animals: a reservoir for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community? Epidemiol Infect 2010;138:595–605.
      1. Malik S, Peng H, Barton MD. Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci associated with cats and dogs. J Appl Microbiol 2005;99:1283–1293.
      1. Manian FA. Asymptomatic nasal carriage of mupirocin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a pet dog associated with MRSA infection in household contacts. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:e26–e28.
      1. Medleau L, Blue JL. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from feline skin lesions. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;193:1080–1081.
      1. Medleau L, Long RE, Brown J, Miller WH. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus species isolated from canine pyodermas. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:229–231.
      1. Mellmann A, Becker K, von Eiff C, Keckevoet U, Schumann P, Harmsen D. Sequencing and staphylococci identification. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:333–336.
      1. NCCLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; Approved standard - Second edition. NCCLS doncument M31-A2. Wayne: NCCLS; 2002.
      1. Nienhoff U, Kadlec K, Chaberny IF, Verspohl J, Gerlach GF, Kreienbrock L, Schwarz S, Simon D, Nolte I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius among dogs admitted to a small animal hospital. Vet Microbiol 2011;150:191–197.
      1. Penna B, Varges R, Martins R, Martins G, Lilenbaum W. In vitro antimicrobial resistance of staphylococci isolated from canine urinary tract infection. Can Vet J 2010;51:738–742.
      1. Soares Magalhães RJ, Loeffler A, Lindsay J, Rich M, Roberts L, Smith H, Lloyd DH, Pfeiffer DU. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in dogs and cats: a case-control study. Vet Res 2010;41:55.
      1. Scott Weese J. Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals. Anim Health Res Rev 2008;9:169–176.
      1. Weese JS, Dick H, Willey BM, McGeer A, Kreiswirth BN, Innis B, Low DE. Suspected transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between domestic pets and humans in veterinary clinics and in the household. Vet Microbiol 2006;115:148–155.
      1. Yoo JH, Yoon JW, Lee SY, Park HM. High prevalence of fluoroquinolone- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine pyoderma and otitis externa in veterinary teaching hospital. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;20:798–802.
      1. Zadoks RN, Watts JL. Species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci: genotyping is superior to phenotyping. Vet Microbiol 2009;134:20–28.
    Cited by
    Crossref 46
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 25
    Scopus 58
    Web of Science 47
    MeSH Terms
    Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial*
    Animals
    Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology*
    Bacterial Proteins/genetics
    Bacterial Proteins/metabolism
    Cat Diseases/epidemiology
    Cat Diseases/microbiology*
    Cats
    Coagulase/genetics
    Coagulase/metabolism
    Dog Diseases/epidemiology
    Dog Diseases/microbiology*
    Dogs
    Female
    Male
    Prevalence
    Risk Factors
    Seasons
    Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/veterinary
    Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology
    Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
    Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary*
    Staphylococcus/classification
    Staphylococcus/genetics
    Staphylococcus/isolation & purification*
    Switzerland/epidemiology
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 5

    Funding Information
    PERMALINK