Abstract
During isolated-word reading, within-word eye-movement tactics (i.e., whether the eye makes one or more fixations on the word) depend strongly on the eye’s-first fixation position in the word; there exists an optimal landing position where the probability of having to refixate the word is much smaller than when the eye first fixates other parts of the word. The present experiment was designed to test whether the optimal landing position effect still exists during text reading, and to compare the nature and strength of the effect with the effect found for isolated words. The results confirmed the existence of an optimal landing position in both reading conditions, but the effect for words in texts was weaker than it was for isolated words, probably because of the presence of factors such as reading rhythm and linguistic context. However, the effect still existed in text reading; within-word tactics during text reading are dependent on the eye’s initial landing position in words. Moreover, individual fixation durations were dependent on within-word tactics. Thus, the initial landing position in words must be taken into account if one wishes to understand eye-movement behavior during text reading. Further results concerned the effects of word length and word frequency in both reading conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A. Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.Cognitive Psychology,17, 364–390.
Balota, D. A., &Rayner, K. (1983). Parafoveal visual information and semantic contextual constraints.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 726–738.
Coëffé, C., &O’Regan, K. (1987). Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects.Vision Research,27, 227–240.
Dunn-Rankin, P. (1978, January). The visual characteristics of words.Scientific American,238(1), 122–130.
Ehrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 641–655.
Findlay, J. M. (1981). Local and global influences on saccadic eye movements. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.),Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 171–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hogaboam, T. W. (1983). Reading patterns in eye movement data. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 309–331). New York: Academic Press.
Holmes, V. M., &O’Regan, J. K. (1987). Decomposing French words. In J. K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 459–466). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Inhoff, A. W., &Rayner, K. (1980). Parafoveal word perception: A case against semantic preprocessing.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 457–464.
Inhoff, A. W., &Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 431–439.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1987).The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kliegl, R., Olson, R. K., &Davidson, B. J. (1982). Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: Comment on Just and Carpenter’s eye fixation theory.Memory & Cognition,10, 287–296.
Lima, S. D., &Inhoff, A. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 272–285.
Mcclelland, J. L., &O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Expectations increase the benefit derived from parafoveal visual information in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 634–644.
Mcconkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., &Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words.Vision Research,28, 1107–1118.
Mcconkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., &Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 245–253.
Mcconkie, G. W., Underwood, N. R., Zola, D., &Wolverton, G. (1985). Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 168–186.
O’Regan, [J.] K. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 501–509.
O’Regan, J. K. (1984). How the eye scans isolated words. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–168). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
O’Regan, J. K. (1989). Visual acuity, lexical structure, and eye movements in word recognition. In B. Elsendoorn & H. Bouma (Eds.),Working models of human perception (pp. 261–292). London: Academic Press.
O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Reviews of oculomotor research: Vol. 4. Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
O’Regan, J. K., &Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 363–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., &BrugaillÈre, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 250–257.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology,7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words.Perception,8, 21–30.
Rayner, K., &Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.
Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., &Bertera, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 167–179.
Rayner, K., Mcconkie, O. W., &Ehrlich, S. (1978). Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 529–544.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., &Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 537–550.
Schubert, R. E., &Eimas, P. D. (1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and non-words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 27–36.
Vitu, F., &O’Regan, J. K. (1988). Effect of parafoveal preprocessing and reading rhythm on optimal landing position in words of different length and frequency. In G. Luer, U. Lass, & J. Schallo-Hoffmann (Eds.),Eye movement research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 286–292). Toronto: Hogrefe.
Vitu, F., & O’Regan, J. K. (in press). Eye movement in reading: Optimal landing position and usefulness of peripheral preview. In D. Brogan (Ed.),The First International Conference on Visual Search Proceedings. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Zola, D. (1984). Redundancy and word perception during reading.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 277–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vitu, F., O’Regan, J. & Mittau, M. Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 583–600 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203111
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203111