Abstract
Many theories of visual perception stipulate that Gestalt grouping occurs preattentively. Subjects’ failure to report perceiving even salient grouping patterns under conditions of inattention challenges this assumption (see, e.g., Mack, Tang, Tuma, Kahn, & Rock, 1992), but Moore and Egeth (1997) showed that although subjects are indeed unable to identify grouping patterns outside the focus of attention, effects of these patterns on visual perception can be observed when they are assessed using implicit, rather than explicit, measures. However, this finding, which is the only one to date demonstrating grouping effects without attention, is open to an alternative account. In the present study, we eliminated this confound and replicated Moore and Egeth’s findings, using the Müller-Lyer illusion (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, we found converging evidence for these findings with a variant of the flanker task (Experiment 3), when the amount of available attentional resources was varied (Experiments 4 and 5). The results reinforce the idea that, although grouping outside the focus of attention cannot be the object of overt report, grouping processes can occur without attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 818–833.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 451–470.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., &Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Ben-Av, M. B., Sagi, D., &Braun, J. (1992). Visual attention and perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 277–294.
Crick, F., &Koch, C. (1998). Consciousness and neuroscience.Cerebral Cortex,8, 97–107.
Dewar, R. E. (1967). Stimulus determinants of the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion.Perceptual & Motor Skills,24, 708–710.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 448–456.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., &Lamy, D. (2003). Attention. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Vol. Eds.),Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 269–292). New York: Wiley.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Greene, E., &Nelson, B. (1997). Evaluating Müller-Lyer effects using single fin-set configurations.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 293–312.
Handy, T. C., &Mangun, G. R. (2000). Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 175–186.
Handy, T. C., Soltani, M., &Mangun, G. R. (2001). Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: Event-related potentials reveal sensorylevel selection.Psychological Science,12, 213–218.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 12–18.
Lamy, D. (2000). Object-based selection under focused attention: A failure to replicate.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1272–1279.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 52–66.
Lamy, D., &Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1387–1400.
Lamy, D., &Tsal, Y. (2001). On the status of location in visual selective attention.European Journal of Psychology,13, 305–342.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N., &de Fockert, J. W. (2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 202–212.
Lavie, N., &Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in objectbased visual selection.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1238–1251.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Law, M. B., &Abrams, R. A. (2002). Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 1017–1027.
Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., &Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention.Cognitive Psychology,24, 475–501.
Moore, C. M., &Egeth, H. E. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 339–352.
Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., &Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion.Psychological Science,9, 104–110.
Mountjoy, P. T. (1958). Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 97–102.
Mukerji, N. (1957). Is “illusion” illusion?Journal of General Psychology, 57, 209–212.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resourcelimited processes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 44–64.
Palmer, S., &Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 29–55.
Pollack, R. H. (1970). Magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion as a function of hue in the absence of lightness contrast.Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association,5, 53–54.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.
Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., &Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method.Cognitive Psychology,24, 502–534.
Shomstein, S., &Yantis, S. (2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting?Perception & Psychophysics,64, 41–51.
Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., &Burkell, J. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 527–532.
Treisman, A., &Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.Cognitive Psychology,14, 107–141.
Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 316–320.
Vecera, S. P., &Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 146–160.
Watson, S. E., &Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization.Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31–49.
Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-directed determinants of attentional control (tutorial). In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by the Israel Science Foundation, Grant 1382-04, to D.L.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamy, D., Segal, H. & Ruderman, L. Grouping does not require attention. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 17–31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193652
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193652