Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2012, 57(11):529-539 | DOI: 10.17221/6386-CJAS

Probiotic properties of Enterococcus faecium CE5-1 producing a bacteriocin-like substance and its antagonistic effect against antibiotic-resistant enterococci in vitro

K. Saelim1, N. Sohsomboon1, S. Kaewsuwan2, S. Maneerat1
1 Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
2 Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand

A bacteriocin-like substance (BLS) producing Enterococcus faecium CE5-1 was isolated from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of Thai indigenous chickens. Investigations of its probiotic potential were carried out. The competition between the BLS probiotic strain and antibiotic-resistant enterococci was also studied. Ent. faecium CE5-1 exhibited a good tolerance to pH 3.0 after 2 h and in 7% fresh chicken bile after 6 h, but the viability of Ent. faecium CE5-1 decreased by about 2-3 log CFU/ml after 2 h incubation in pH 2.5. It was susceptible to the antibiotics tested (tetracycline, erythromycin, penicillin G, and vancomycin). The maximum BLS production from Ent. faecium CE5-1 was observed at 15 h of cultivation. It showed activity against Listeria monocytogenes DMST17303, Pediococcus pentosaceus 3CE27, Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei JCM1157, and antibiotic-resistant enterococci. The detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the enterocin structural gene determined the presence of enterocin A gene in Ent. faecium CE5-1 only. Ent. faecium CE5-1 showed the highest inhibitory activity against two antibiotic-resistant Ent. faecalis VanB (from 6.68 to 4.29 log CFU/ml) and Ent. gallinarum VanC (from 6.76 to 4.31 log CFU/ml) after 12 h of co-cultivation. The results show the future possible use of Ent. faecium CE5-1 as a probiotic strain for livestock to control antibiotic-resistant enterococci.

Keywords: chicken; gastrointestinal tract; bile salt; acid tolerance; Enterococcus

Published: November 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Saelim K, Sohsomboon N, Kaewsuwan S, Maneerat S. Probiotic properties of Enterococcus faecium CE5-1 producing a bacteriocin-like substance and its antagonistic effect against antibiotic-resistant enterococci in vitro . Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2012;57(11):529-539. doi: 10.17221/6386-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Abriouel H., Lucas R., Omar N.B., Valdivia E., Maqueda M., Martínez-Cañamero M., Gálvez A. (2005): Enterocin AS-48RJ: A variant of enterocin AS-48 chromosomally encoded by Enterococcus faecium RJ16 isolated from food. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 28, 387-397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Almeida L.S.B., Murata R.M., Yatsuda R., Dos Santos M.H., Nagem T.J., Alencar S.M., Koo H., Rosalen P.L. (2008): Antimicrobial activity of Rheedia brasiliensis and 7-epiclusianone against Streptococcus mutans. Phytomedicine, 15, 886-891. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Apata D.F. (2009): Antibiotic resistance in poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8, 404-408. Go to original source...
  4. Aymerich T., Holo H., Havarstein L.S., Hugas M., Garriga M., Nes I. (1996): Biochemical and genetic characterization of enterocin A from Enterococcus faecium, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62, 1676-1682. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Begley M., Gahan C.M.G., Hill C. (2005): The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 29, 625-651. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Casaus P., Nilsen T., Cintas L.M., Nes I.F., Hernandez P.E., Holo H. (1997): Enterocin B, a new bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium T136 which can act synergistically with enterocin A. Microbiology, 143, 2287-2294. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Charteris W.P., Kelly P.M., Morelli L., Collins J.K. (1998): Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84, 759-768. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cintas L.M., Casaus P., Havarstain L.V., Hernandez P.E., Nes I.F. (1997): Biochemical and genetic characterization of enterocin P, a novel sec-dependent bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium P13 with abroad antimicrobial spectrum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 4321-4330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Cintas L.M., Casaus P., Holo H., Hernandez P.E., Nes I.F., Havarstain L.S. (1998): Enterocins L50A and L50B, two novel bacteriocins from Enterococcus faecium L50 are related to staphylococcal haemolysins. Journal of Bacteriology, 180, 1988-1994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Cleveland J., Montville T.J., Nes I.F., Chikinda M.L. (2001): Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 71, 1-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. D'Aimmo M.R., Modesto M., Biavati B. (2007): Antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from dairy and pharmaceutical products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 115, 35-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. De Vuyst L., Degeest B. (1999): Heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 23, 153-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Franz C.M.A.P., Holzapfel W.H., Stiles M.E. (1999): Enterococci at the crossroads of food safety. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 47, 1-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Franz C.M.A.P., van Belkum M.J., Holzapfel W.H., Abriouel H., Gálvez A. (2007): Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 31, 293-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Fuller R. (1989): Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66, 365-378. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ghrairi T., Frere J., Berjeaud J.M., Manai M. (2008): Purification and characterisation of bacteriocins produced by Enterococcus faecium from Tunisian rigouta cheese. Food Control, 19, 162-169. Go to original source...
  17. He L., Chen W., Liu Y. (2006): Production and partial characterization of bacteriocin-like peptides by Bacillus licheniformis ZJU12. Microbiology Research, 161, 321-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hood S.K., Zoitola E.A. (1988): Effect of low pH on the ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus to survive and adhere to human intestinal cells. Journal of Food Science, 53, 1514-1516. Go to original source...
  19. Hosseini S.V., Arlindo S., Böhme K., Fernández-No C., CaloMata P., Barros-Velázquez J. (2009): Molecular and probiotic characterization of bacteriocin producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from nonfermented animal foods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 107, 1392-1403. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Huang Y., Adams M.C. (2004): In vitro assessment of the upper gastrointestinal tolerance of potential probiotic dairy propionibacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 91, 253-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Jack R.W., Tagg J.R., Ray B. (1995): Bacteriocins of Grampositive bacteria. Microbiology Reviews, 59, 171-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Karthikeyan V., Santhosh S.W. (2009): Study of bacteriocin as a food preservative and the L. acidophilus strain as probiotic. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8, 335-340. Go to original source...
  23. Klare I., Konstabel C., Badstübner D., Werner G., Witte W. (2003): Occurrence and spread of antibiotic resistances in Enteroccoccus faecium. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 88, 269-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Lauková A., Strompfová V., Simonová M., ©tyriak I., Swiecicka I. (2008): Species of Enterococcus faecalis associated with free-living rodents. Folia Microbiologica, 53, 173- 178.
  25. Lin W.H., Hwang C.F., Chen L.W., Tsen H.Y. (2006): Viable counts, characteristic evaluation for commercial lactic acid bacteria products. Food Microbiology, 23, 74-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Lin W.H., Yu B., Jang S.H., Tsen H.Y. (2007): Different probiotic properties for Lactobacillus fermentum strains isolated from swine and poultry. Anaerobe, 13, 107-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Madureira A.R., Pereira C.I., Truszkowska K., Gomes A.M., Pintado M.E., Malcata F.X. (2005): Survival of probiotic bacteria in a whey cheese vector submitted to environmental conditions prevailing in the gastrointestinal tract. International Dairy Journal, 15, 921-927. Go to original source...
  28. Moser S.A., Savage D.C. (2001): Bile salt hydrolase activity and resistance to toxicity of conjugated bile salts are unrelated properties in lactobacilli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 3476-3480. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Musikasang H., Tani A., H-kittikun A., Maneerat S. (2009): Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from chicken gastrointestinal digestive tract. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 25, 1337-1345. Go to original source...
  30. Ogier J.C., Serror P. (2008): Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Enterococcus genus. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 126, 291-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. O'Keeffe T., Hill C., Ross R.P. (1999): Characterization and heterologous expression of the genes encoding enterocin A production, immunity, and regulation in Enterococcus faecium DPC1146. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 1506-1515. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Parente E., Brienza C., Moles M., Ricciardi A. (1995): A comparison of methods for the measurement of bacteriocin activity. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 22, 95-108. Go to original source...
  33. Park H.S., Lee S.H., Uhm T.B. (1998): Selection of microorganisms for probiotics and their characterization. Korean Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 27, 433-440.
  34. Rehaiem A., Martínez B., Manai M., Rodríguez A. (2009): Production of enterocin A by Enterococcus faecium MMRA isolated from 'Rayeb', a traditional Tunisian dairy beverage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 108, 1685-1993. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Robredo B., Singh K., Baquero F., Murray B., Torres C. (2000): Vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolated from animal and food. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 54, 197-204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Salminen S., Wright A. (1998): Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiology and Functional Aspects. 2nd Ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA.
  37. Schillinger U., Lücke F.K. (1989): Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 1901-1906. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Shin M.S., Han S.K., Ji A.R., Kim K.S., Lee W.K. (2008): Isolation and characterization of bacteriocin-producing bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens for probiotic use. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 105, 2203-2212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Souza M.R., Moreira J.L., Barbosa F.H.F., Cerqueira M.M.O.P., Nunes A.C., Nicoli J.R. (2007): Influence of intensive and extensive breeding on lactic acid bacteria isolated from Gallus gallus domesticus ceca. Veterinary Microbiology, 120, 142-150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Strompfová V., Lauková A. (2007): In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe, 13, 228-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Strompfová V., Lauková A., Simonová M., Marciňáková M. (2008): Occurrence of the structural enterocin A, P, B, L50B genes in enterococci of different origin. Veterinary Microbiology, 132, 293-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Tanaka H., Doesburg K., Iwasaki T., Mierau I. (1999): Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 2530-2535. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Taranto M.P., Perez-Martinez G., de Valdez G.F. (2006): Effect of bile acid on the cell membrane functionality of lactic acid bacteria for oral administration. Research in Microbiology, 157, 720-725. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Todorov S.D., Dicks L.M.T. (2005): Optimization of bacteriocin ST311LD production by Enterococcus faecium ST311LD, isolated from spoiled black olives. Journal of Microbiology, 43, 370-374. Go to PubMed...
  45. Todorov S.D., Dicks L.M.T. (2009): Effect of modified MRS medium on production and purification of antimicrobial peptide ST4SA produced by Enterococcus mundtii. Anaerobe, 15, 65-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Wang X., Brown I.L., Evans A.J., Conway P.L. (1999): The protective effects of high amylose maize (amylomaize) starch granules on the survival of Bifidobacterium spp. in the mouse intestinal tract. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 87, 631-639. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Xiraphi N., Georgalaki M., Rantsiou K., Cocolin L., Tsakalidou E., Drosinos E.H. (2008): Purification and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides E131. Meat Science, 80, 194-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Yi H., Zhang L., Tuo Y., Han X., Du M. (2010): A novel method for rapid detection of class IIa bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. Food Control, 21, 426-430. Go to original source...
  49. Zárate G., Chaia A.P., González S., Oliver G. (2000): Viability and beta-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. Journal of Food Protection, 63, 1214-1221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.