CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84(02): 185-195
DOI: 10.1055/a-2238-3153
GebFra Science
Original Article

Long-term Follow-up and Safety of Patients after an Upfront Therapy with Letrozole for Early Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Care – The PreFace Study

Langfristige Nachbeobachtung und Sicherheit im klinischen Alltag bei Patientinnen nach Upfront-Therapie mit Letrozol zur Behandlung von Brustkrebs im Frühstadium – die PreFace-Studie
Carolin C. Hack
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Nicolai Maass
2   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN54186)
,
Bahriye Aktas
3   Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39066)
,
Sherko Kümmel
4   Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum an den Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
,
Christoph Thomssen
5   Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN9176)
,
Christopher Wolf
6   Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Hans-Christian Kolberg
7   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
,
Cosima Brucker
8   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN470426)
,
Wolfgang Janni
9   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27197)
,
Peter Dall
10   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Municipal Clinical Center, Lüneburg, Germany
,
Andreas Schneeweiss
11   National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
,
Frederik Marme
12   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN36642)
,
Matthias Ruebner
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
13   Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
,
Nadine M. Hofmann
13   Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
,
Sybille Böhm
13   Institut für Frauengesundheit GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
,
Katrin Almstedt
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
14   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Sara Kellner
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Naiba Nabieva
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Paul Gass
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Marc W. Sütterlin
12   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN36642)
,
Hans-Joachim Lück
15   Gynäkologisch-Onkologische Praxis Hannover, Hannover, Germany
,
Sabine Schmatloch
16   Elisabeth Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN502336)
,
Matthias Kalder
17   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN459588)
,
Christoph Uleer
18   Gyn.-onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
,
Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
19   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14879)
,
Volker Hanf
20   Frauenklinik, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN37110)
,
Christian Jackisch
21   Frauenklinik Sana Klinikum, Offenbach, Germany
,
Volkmar Müller
22   Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
,
Brigitte Rack
9   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27197)
,
Erik Belleville
23   Clin-Sol GmbH Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
,
Diethelm Wallwiener
24   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN9188)
,
Achim Rody
25   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
,
Claudia Rauh
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
26   Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Ringgold ID: RIN27252)
,
Christian M. Bayer
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
27   WMC HEALTHCARE GmbH, München, Germany
,
Sabrina Uhrig
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Chloë Goossens
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Sara Y. Brucker
24   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN9188)
,
Lothar Häberle
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
28   Biostatistics Unit, Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
,
Tanja N. Fehm
29   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
30   Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Aachen Bonn Köln Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Alexander Hein
31   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN15004)
,
Peter A. Fasching
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: Novartis Germany GmbH

Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT01908556, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: prospective open label phase IV clinical trial

Abstract

Introduction

Adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) should include an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Especially patients with a high recurrence risk might benefit from an upfront therapy with an AI for a minimum of five years. Nevertheless, not much is known about the patient selection for this population in clinical practice. Therefore, this study analyzed the prognosis and patient characteristics of postmenopausal patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy.

Patients and Methods

From 2009 to 2011, 3529 patients were enrolled into the adjuvant phase IV PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556). Postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive BC patients, for whom an upfront five-year therapy with letrozole (2.5 mg/day) was indicated, were eligible. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in relation to patient and tumor characteristics were assessed.

Results

3297 patients started letrozole therapy. The majority of patients (n = 1639, 57%) completed the five-year treatment. 34.5% of patients continued with endocrine therapy after the mandated five-year endocrine treatment. Five-year DFS rates were 89% (95% CI: 88–90%) and five-year OS rates were 95% (95% CI: 94–96%). In subgroup analyses, DFS rates were 83%, 84% and 78% for patients with node-positive disease, G3 tumor grading, and pT3 tumors respectively. The main adverse events (any grade) were pain and hot flushes (66.8% and 18.3% of patients).

Conclusions

The risk profile of postmenopausal BC patients selected for a five-year upfront letrozole therapy showed a moderate recurrence and death risk. However, in subgroups with unfavorable risk factors, prognosis warrants an improvement, which might be achieved with novel targeted therapies.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung

Die adjuvante Behandlung von Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs im Frühstadium sollte eine Therapie mit einem Aromatasehemmer (AH) miteinschließen. Patientinnen mit einem hohen Rezidivrisiko profitieren besonders von einer Upfront-Therapie mit einem AH, die sich über einen Mindestzeitraum von 5 Jahren erstreckt. Dennoch ist nicht viel über die Selektion geeigneter Patientinnen in dieser Population in der Praxis bekannt. Diese Studie hat deshalb die Prognosen und Charakteristika von postmenopausalen Patientinnen, die für eine Upfront-Therapie mit Letrozol über 5 Jahre ausgewählt wurden, analysiert.

Patientinnen und Methoden

Zwischen 2009 und 2011 nahmen 3529 Patientinnen an der adjuvanten klinischen Phase-IV-PreFace-Studie (NCT01908556) teil. Eingeschlossen wurden postmenopausale hormonrezeptorpositive Brustkrebspatientinnen mit Indikation für eine 5-jährige Upfront-Therapie mit Letrozol (2,5 mg/Tag). Beurteilt wurden krankheitsfreies Überleben (KFÜ), Gesamtüberleben (GÜ) und Sicherheit in Abhängigkeit von den Patientinnen- und Tumorcharakteristika.

Ergebnisse

Insgsamt begannen 3297 Patientinnen mit einer Letrozol-Therapie. Die Mehrheit der Patientinnen (n = 1639, 57%) haben die 5-jährige Behandlung abgeschlossen. Nach Beendigung der angeordneten 5-jährigen endokrinen Behandlung machten 34,5% der Patientinnen mit einer endokrinen Therapie weiter. Die 5-jährige KFÜ-Rate betrug 89% (95%-KI: 88–90%) und die 5-jährige GÜ-Rate war 95% (95%-KI: 94–96%). Bei der Subgruppenanalyse betrugen die KFÜ-Raten 83%, 84% resp. 78% für Patientinnen mit jeweils nodal-positivem Brustkrebs, Tumorgrad G3 bzw. pT3-Tumoren. Zu den wichtigsten unerwünschten Ereignissen (aller Schweregrade) gehörten Schmerzen sowie Hitzewallungen (die jeweils bei 66,8% bzw. 18,3% der Patientinnen auftraten).

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Analyse des Risikoprofils von postmenopausalen Brustkrebspatientinnen, die für eine 5-jährige Upfront-Therapie mit Letrozol ausgewählt wurden, zeigte ein mäßiges Rezidiv- und Sterberisiko. Aber bei Untergruppen mit ungünstigen Risikofaktoren rechtfertigt die Prognose die Suche nach Verbesserungen, die mithilfe neuartiger zielgerichteter Therapien erreicht werden können.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 17 November 2023

Accepted after revision: 21 December 2023

Article published online:
08 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Breast Cancer Version 3.2022. 2022 Accessed July 18, 2022 at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf
  • 2 Ditsch N, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Friedrich M. et al. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2021. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16: 214-227 DOI: 10.1159/000516419. (PMID: 34248462)
  • 3 Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI. et al. Exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: NCIC CTG MA.27--a randomized controlled phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 1398-1404 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7805. (PMID: 23358971)
  • 4 Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Puntoni M. et al. Switching to anastrozole versus continued tamoxifen treatment of early breast cancer: preliminary results of the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole Trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 5138-5147 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.120. (PMID: 16009955)
  • 5 Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M. et al. Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years’ adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 455-462 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67059-6. (PMID: 16084253)
  • 6 Kaufmann M, Jonat W, Hilfrich J. et al. Improved overall survival in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after anastrozole initiated after treatment with tamoxifen compared with continued tamoxifen: the ARNO 95 Study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 2664-2670 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8054. (PMID: 17563395)
  • 7 Baum M, Buzdar A, Cuzick J. et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses. Cancer 2003; 98: 1802-1810 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11745. (PMID: 14584060)
  • 8 Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ. et al. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1081-1092 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040331. (PMID: 15014181)
  • 9 van de Velde CJ, Rea D, Seynaeve C. et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 321-331 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62312-4. (PMID: 21247627)
  • 10 Dubsky PC, Jakesz R, Mlineritsch B. et al. Tamoxifen and anastrozole as a sequencing strategy: a randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 722-728 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8993. (PMID: 22271481)
  • 11 Baum M, Budzar AU, Cuzick J. et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09088-8. (PMID: 12090977)
  • 12 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 386: 1341-1352 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61074-1. (PMID: 26211827)
  • 13 Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Lüftner D. et al. Initial experience with CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapies compared to antihormone monotherapies in routine clinical use in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer – Data from the PRAEGNANT research network for the first 2 years of drug availability in Germany. Breast 2020; 54: 88-95 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.011. (PMID: 32956934)
  • 14 Harbeck N, Rastogi P, Martin M. monarchE Committee Members. et al. Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: updated efficacy and Ki-67 analysis from the monarchE study. Ann Oncol 2021; 32: 1571-1581 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.015. (PMID: 34656740)
  • 15 Fasching PA, Gass P, Häberle L. et al. Prognostic effect of Ki-67 in common clinical subgroups of patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175: 617-625 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05198-9. (PMID: 30868391)
  • 16 Slamon DJ, Stroyakovskiy D, Yardley DA. et al. Phase III NATALEE trial of ribociclib + endocrine therapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer. ASCO Annual Meeting 2023; 2023: LBA500
  • 17 Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M. et al. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 144: 545-563 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0904-SA. (PMID: 31928354)
  • 18 Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH. et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 2105-2122 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738. (PMID: 29846122)
  • 19 Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R. monarchE Committee Members and Investigators. et al. Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2−, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3987-3998 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.02514. (PMID: 32954927)
  • 20 Ingle JN, Cairns J, Suman VJ. et al. Anastrozole has an Association between Degree of Estrogen Suppression and Outcomes in Early Breast Cancer and is a Ligand for Estrogen Receptor alpha. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26: 2986-2996 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3091. (PMID: 32098767)
  • 21 Ingle JN, Xie F, Ellis MJ. et al. Genetic Polymorphisms in the Long Noncoding RNA MIR2052HG Offer a Pharmacogenomic Basis for the Response of Breast Cancer Patients to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy. Cancer Res 2016; 76: 7012-7023 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1371. (PMID: 27758888)
  • 22 Fasching PA, Yadav S, Hu C. et al. Mutations inBRCA1/2and Other Panel Genes in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer -Association With Patient and Disease Characteristics and Effect on Prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 1619-1630 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01200. (PMID: 33780288)
  • 23 Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B. et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2021; 384: 2394-2405 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2105215. (PMID: 34081848)
  • 24 Tutt ANJ, Garber J, Gelber RD. et al. VP1–2022: Pre-specified event driven analysis of Overall Survival (OS) in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib (OL) in germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) associated breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.008.
  • 25 Slamon DJ, Fasching PA, Patel R. et al. NATALEE: Phase III study of ribociclib (RIBO) + endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (Suppl. 15) TPS597
  • 26 clinicaltrials.gov. NCT03701334, A Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib With Endocrine Therapy as Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer (NATALEE). NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2018 Accessed November 07, 2020 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03701334