Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Closer Look Beneath the Surface: Various Facets of the Think-Manager–Think-Male Stereotype

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that successful managers are perceived as possessing characteristics that belong to a global masculine stereotype. This study was designed to compare the gender-stereotypical perception of leadership by investigating global and leadership-specific gender stereotypes and contrasting self-perception and the perceptionby others. Descriptive and prescriptive norms were analyzed and abilities studied in a leadership context. The sample consists of 215 management students, and the results indicate an impact of gender stereotypes on the perception of leadership by women and men. Ratings of the importance of leadership characteristics yielded a less gender-stereotypic view, especially by female participants. In their self-evaluations women and men did not differ in the degree in which they possess person- and task-oriented skills. They also did not differ in their ratings of the importance of possessing these skills themselves. Finally, women reported that they possess task-oriented abilities more seldom than such abilities were attributed to leaders-in-general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 31, 634-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., & Smith, E. R. (1990). Gender and racial stereotypes in impression formation and social decision-making processes. Sex Roles, 22, 627-647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 413-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. J., & Stevenson, M. A. (1998). Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plus ca change.... Sex Roles, 38, 287-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1979). Self-evaluations of male and female managers. Sex Roles, 5, 571-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., et al. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1171-1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienel, C. (1996). Frauen in Führungspositionen in Europa. München, Verlag Deutsches Jugendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Gilroy, F. D., & Fenzel, L. M. (1995). Requisite management characteristics revisited: Two decades later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 253-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (in press). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Identity, leadership, and power. London: Sage.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women's social construction of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society: Applied social psychology annual (pp. 173-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perception of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, R., & Wade, M. B. (1996). The dilemma of self-advocacy for women: Another case of blaming the victim? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15, 445-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeserich, W. (1989). Mitarbeiter auswählen und fördern: Assessment-Center-Verfahren. München, Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Executive, 5, 48-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M., & von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1999). Reflections on the glass ceiling: Recent trends and future prospects. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 325-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? Journal of Management, 28, 177-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1975). Relations between sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 439-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20, 103-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager–think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C. A., Cogliser, C. C., Neider, L. L., Fleishman, E. A., & James, L. (1998). The Ohio State model. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership—The multiple-level approaches: Classical and new wave (Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, Vol. 24, pp. 3-72). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity–femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, T. M. (2002). Gender typing of the successful manager—A stereotype reconsidered. Sex Roles, 46, 385-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes. A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Sabine Sczesny

Authors
  1. Sabine Sczesny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Sczesny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sczesny, S. A Closer Look Beneath the Surface: Various Facets of the Think-Manager–Think-Male Stereotype. Sex Roles 49, 353–363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025112204526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025112204526

Search

Navigation