Trends in Biotechnology
Volume 32, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 608-616
Journal home page for Trends in Biotechnology

Opinion
Metabolic variability in bioprocessing: implications of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.10.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Microbial phenotypic heterogeneity impacts upon bioprocess performance.

  • Microbial phenotypic heterogeneity depends not only on stochasticity of gene expression but also on stochasticity at the level of metabolic reactions.

  • Metabolic variability and specialization in bioprocessing can be a source of new metabolic engineering strategies.

  • New analytical tools and bioreactor technologies for studying/controlling microbial phenotypic heterogeneity are considered.

Phenotypic heterogeneity is a major issue in the context of industrial bioprocessing. Stochasticity of gene expression is usually considered to be the main source of heterogeneity among microbial population, but recent evidence demonstrates that metabolic reactions can also be subject to stochasticity without any intervention of gene expression. Although metabolic heterogeneity can be encountered in laboratory-scale cultivation devices, stochasticity at the level of metabolic reactions is perturbed directly by microenvironmental heterogeneities occurring in large-scale bioreactors. Accordingly, analytical tools are needed for the determination of metabolic variability in bioprocessing conditions and for the efficient design of metabolic engineering strategies. In this context, implementation of single cell technologies for bioprocess monitoring would benefit from knowledge acquired in more fundamental studies.

Section snippets

Impact of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity on microbial bioprocesses

Until now, microbial phenotypic heterogeneity has generally only been explored in basic scientific research, and few studies have taken this important phenomenon into account in the context of industrial biotechnological applications 1, 2. The production of bio-based compounds is dependent on stochastic cellular mechanisms, leading to difficulties in controlling bioprocessing. It is thus of primary importance to increase our knowledge of the mechanisms involved in phenotypic diversification.

What are the sources of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity?

Although stochasticity occurs at the level of gene expression [3], stochastic effects can be observed at the level of the metabolic pathways themselves (Figure 1A and Box 1). Metabolic reactions can be directly influenced by bioprocessing conditions, and thus deeper understanding of their influence of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity would lead to technical solutions that can be implemented in the design of more robust microbial cell factories. The fact that a clonal population of microbial

How to measure phenotypic heterogeneity?

Distributions of cell parameters are generally measured by optical methods such as flow cytometry or microscopy. Flow cytometry is a very promising technique because it can be coupled to the bioreactor, delivering on-line measurement of cell distributions during a bioprocess, but the technique also has some drawbacks that can be potentially avoided by complementary techniques. We now address the actual methodologies available for the characterization of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity in

How to control microbial phenotypic heterogeneity?

Technologically relevant methodologies aimed at controlling microbial phenotypic heterogeneity will now be considered. Metabolic engineering can be designed to reduce phenotypic plasticity. To control metabolic variability, cofactor engineering, in particular, must be considered. In addition, synthetic biology may provide access to specific DNA components and devices aimed at controlling noise in gene expression 41, 42. Bioreactor design can also be modified to exploit phenotypic heterogeneity.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

Microbial phenotypic heterogeneity clearly plays an important role in bioprocess robustness, but additional data will be necessary to address its implications more fully. Indeed, recent results have revealed stochasticity at the level of metabolic reactions without any intervention of gene expression mechanisms, multiplying the possible sources of phenotypic heterogeneity. Dedicated single cell analytical tools are thus needed for this purpose, and solutions are already available for this

Acknowledgments

F.D. gratefully acknowledges the Belgian fund for scientific research [Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS), Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), Brussels, Belgium] for support through several research grants. Q.Z. is the recipient of a FRIA (Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture) PhD grant provided by the FRS–FNRS. A.R.L acknowledges support by CONACyT and PROMEP grants 183911 and 10828, respectively. F.D. and A.R.L. acknowledge the

References (75)

  • S. Müller

    Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • F. Delvigne et al.

    Microbial heterogeneity affects bioprocess robustness: Dynamic single cell analysis contribute to understanding microbial populations

    Biotechnol. J.

    (2014)
  • V. de Lorenzo

    From the selfish gene to selfish metabolism: revisiting the central dogma

    Bioessays

    (2014)
  • A. Sanchez et al.

    Genetic determinants and cellular constraints in noisy gene expression

    Science

    (2013)
  • B. Ryall

    Culture history and population heterogeneity as determinants of bacterial adaptation: the adaptomics of a single environmental transition

    Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • J. Casadesus et al.

    Programmed heterogeneity: epigenetic mechanisms in bacteria

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2013)
  • B. Tracy

    Development and application of flow-cytometric techniques for analyzing and sorting endospore-forming clostridia

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2008)
  • S. Alonso

    Physiological heterogeneity of Pseudomonas taetrolens during lactobionic acid production

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • A. Want

    Studies related to antibody fragment (Fab) production in Escherichia coli W3110 fed-batch fermentation processes using multiparameter flow cytometry

    Cytometry A

    (2009)
  • K. Lee

    Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters for heterologous gene expression in Kluyveromyces marxianus

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2013)
  • S.F. Levy

    Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant

    PLoS Biol.

    (2012)
  • K. Love

    Integrated single-cell analysis shows Pichia pastoris secretes protein stochastically

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2010)
  • N. Mustafi

    Application of a genetically encoded biosensor for live cell imaging of L-valine production in pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-deficient Corynebacterium glutamicum strains

    PLoS ONE

    (2014)
  • M.R. Bennett

    Metabolic gene regulation in a dynamically changing environment

    Nature

    (2008)
  • R. Takors

    Scale-up of microbial processes: impacts, tools and open questions

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • P. Neubauer et al.

    Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • A.R. Lara

    Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors – understanding the effects of environmental gradients on cells

    Mol. Biotechnol.

    (2006)
  • A. Lapin

    Modeling the dynamics of E. coli populations in the three-dimensional turbulent field of a stirred bioreactor – a structured-segregated approach

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2006)
  • M. Lidstrom et al.

    The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior

    Nat. Chem. Biol.

    (2010)
  • M. Acar

    Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments

    Nat. Genet.

    (2008)
  • N. Nikolic

    Analysis of fluorescent reporters indicates heterogeneity in glucose uptake and utilization in clonal bacterial populations

    BMC Microbiol.

    (2013)
  • P. Labhsetwar

    Heterogeneity in protein expression induces metabolic variability in a modeled Escherichia coli population

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2013)
  • J. van Heerden

    Lost in transition: startup of glycolysis yields subpopulations of nongrowing cells

    Science

    (2014)
  • A. Grunberger

    Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2014)
  • J. Young

    Measuring single-cell gene expression dynamics in bacteria using fluorescence time-lapse microscopy

    Nat. Protoc.

    (2011)
  • H.M. Davey et al.

    Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide

    Environ. Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • C.J. Hewitt

    A comparison of high cell density fed-batch fermentations involving both induced and non-induced recombinant Escherichia coli under well-mixed small-scale and simulated poorly mixed large-scale conditions

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2007)
  • A. Lapin

    Multi-scale spatio-temporal modeling: lifelines of microorganisms in bioreactors and tracking molecules in cells

    Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • J. Morchain

    A coupled population balance model and CFD approach for the simulation of mixing issues in lab-scale and industrial bioreactors

    AIChE J.

    (2014)
  • A. Delafosse

    CFD-based compartment model for description of mixing in bioreactors

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Y. Taniguchi

    Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells

    Science

    (2010)
  • M. Jahn

    Subpopulation-proteomics in prokaryotic populations

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • M. Arnoldini

    Monitoring of dynamic microbiological processes using real-time flow cytometry

    PLoS ONE

    (2013)
  • A. Brognaux

    A low-cost, multiplexable, automated flow cytometry procedure for the characterization of microbial stress dynamics in bioreactors

    Microb. Cell Fact.

    (2013)
  • F. Delvigne

    Dynamic single-cell analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under process perturbation: comparison of different methods for monitoring the intensity of population heterogeneity

    J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.

    (2014)
  • B. Okumus

    Fluidic and microfluidic tools for quantitative systems biology

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2014)
  • K.R. Love

    Systematic single-cell analysis of Pichia pastoris reveals secretory capacity limits productivity

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text