Special Issue: Defaunation’s impact in tropical terrestrial ecosystemsThe shifted baseline: Prehistoric defaunation in the tropics and its consequences for biodiversity conservation
Highlights
► Most terrestrial ecosystems have lost large vertebrates since the Pleistocene. ► I assess the likely impacts of these losses and potential conservation responses. ► We should prioritize conservation and reintroduction of the surviving megafauna. ► We need reversible experiments with taxon substitutes for extinct species. ► Megafauna-dependent species may need conservation attention.
Introduction
The term ‘shifting baseline’ is used to describe the way changes to a system are measured against earlier reference states that themselves differ significantly from the original state of the system (e.g. Pauly, 1995). Although not easily quantified, shifting baselines are likely to be a particular problem for ecological studies in the tropics, where the earliest written descriptions are often <200 years old and the first quantitative studies have usually taken place in the last few decades, while significant human impacts may have started millennia or tens of millennia before. Of the two forms of shifting baseline identified by Papworth et al. (2009), personal and generational, the most relevant to the subject of this review is ‘generational amnesia’, where each new generation is unaware of—or, perhaps, does not take seriously—the environmental knowledge of previous generations. As Turvey et al. (2010) demonstrated for Yangtze fishing communities, loss of knowledge of even large and charismatic species can be startlingly rapid. If this can happen in China, with its exceptionally long and well-preserved written history, it is not surprising that in parts of the world without a long period of recorded history, biologists tend to work from a baseline only decades earlier.
The realization that some human impacts, including those on climate, are irreversible on a human timescale is beginning to reduce the hold that ‘historical baselines’ have had on ecology and conservation (e.g. Thomas, 2011), but it is still important for both scientific and practical reasons to understand how ecological systems functioned over the period when currently extant species were evolving, i.e. the last 1–3 million years. This period has experienced relatively minor changes in geography after the formation of the Panama isthmus, but wide fluctuations in global climate have driven large changes in habitats and local biotic communities. Two unidirectional changes stand out from this fluctuating picture: the origin and spread of increasingly modern humans and the loss of most of the megafauna (defined here as animals heavier than 44 kg).
There is still considerable debate about the relationship between these two changes, but the multiple coincidences of megafaunal extinctions with the local arrival of modern humans from c. 50,000 to 600 years ago make a strong case that at least these relatively recent extinctions were caused by humans, or by humans in conjunction with climate change (Lorenzen et al., 2011, Prescott et al., 2012, Brook and Barnosky, 2012). If one theory can be said to dominate in the recent literature, it is that the presence of an intelligent, social, weapon-bearing, bipedal ape changed an otherwise unexceptional glacial termination into a lethal event for many large, slow-breeding vertebrates. This theory differs considerably from Paul Martin’s original ‘human blitzkrieg’ model, in which climate did not have a major role (Martin, 1973). Note also that each glacial cycle is unique and some authors have suggested that the unique climatic features of the last glacial termination made a significant contribution to the unprecedented extinctions (e.g., the combination of a period of rapid cooling, high variance in temperature, and low mean temperature; Prescott et al., 2012).
Extinctions earlier in the Pleistocene (>60,000 years ago) can be more confidently attributed to climate change (e.g. in Eastern Australia; Hocknull et al., 2007), except in Africa, where early hominins may have had an impact from the early Pleistocene (Lyons et al., 2004), and Asia, where Homo erectus was present from 1.7 to 1.6 m years ago (Louys and Turner, 2012). The hunting abilities of H. erectus are still debated, but, armed with stone flakes and perhaps more perishable plant-based weapons (wooden throwing spears were used in Europe 400,000 years ago; Thieme, 1997), the first Asian hominids must surely have exploited at least the slow-moving giant tortoises and giant pangolin—all now extinct—and could plausibly have hunted much larger animals (Dennell, 2009, Louys and Turner, 2012). For example, a giant forest ape, Gigantopithecus blacki, coexisted with Homo in the forests of northern tropical and subtropical East Asia for much of the Middle Pleistocene but disappeared c. 300,000 years ago (Zhao et al., 2011). There is no evidence for hunting, but a slow-moving terrestrial ape would surely have been vulnerable. Ben-Dor et al. (2011) point out that, in comparison with smaller, faster species, elephants do not require a sophisticated hunting strategy. Corlett (2010) tentatively attributed the lack of a clear extinction spike at the time when modern humans are thought to have arrived in SE Asia (60–50,000 B.P.) to the earlier impacts of pre-modern Homo, as well as the initial concentration of modern humans along coasts. In contrast, Louys (2012) considered that pre-Holocene extinctions in SE Asia were primarily driven by loss of open habitats. Both authors agree, however, that the relatively few megafaunal extinctions in SE Asia hide massive range reductions in several species, including orangutans and the giant panda.
Who or what killed the megafauna, and precisely when, has received more attention than the ecological consequences of megafaunal extinctions, although there is a large and growing literature on this subject as well. The main practical justification for studying the consequences of these extinctions is that they may provide a possible model for predicting the impacts of the on-going removal of the surviving megafauna—and numerous smaller species—from most of the tropics. The focus on the last 50,000 years has meant that discussion has been largely limited to North and South America, Northern Eurasia, Australia, Madagascar, and New Zealand, with the impact of the more gradual changes in SE Asia receiving less attention.
This review takes a broader view, considering the environmental impacts—and modern-day implications for conservation management—of all tropical lowland extinctions of vertebrates >44 kg body mass from the early Middle Pleistocene (781,000 years ago), when most areas had a generally modern vertebrate fauna, to the Holocene (>2000 years ago, and thus before any recent ‘baseline’). I have adopted this single, arbitrary, body-size cut-off because it is widely used in the literature and facilitates pantropical comparisons. The idea that the megafauna concept should be extended to the largest animals in any assemblage (Hansen and Galetti, 2009) makes a lot of sense for many processes, but there are also megafaunal impacts for which absolute size is important. Historical extinctions are considered in other papers in this issue.
Section snippets
Methods
Megafaunal extinctions on continents are well-documented, but species >44 kg body mass were also found on islands, including oceanic islands with no previous land connections. For example, fossils of dwarfed, but still megafaunal, proboscideans occur on many islands >100 km2 and a distinct subspecies of Galapagos giant tortoise (Chelonoidis nigra) survives today on 18 km2 Pinzón Island. I have therefore checked as many as possible of the tropical islands in this size range (18–100 km2) and above,
The ubiquity of megafaunal extinctions
All continental and many island terrestrial ecosystems in the tropics are known to have lost one or more megafaunal species since the Middle Pleistocene, with most surviving species reduced in historical times to low densities (Table 1). The exceptions are remote oceanic islands that apparently never supported a megafauna (e.g. Hawaiian archipelago), less remote oceanic islands with a limited or no fossil record, and the Aldabra and the Galapagos Islands, which still support giant tortoises and
Consequences of megafaunal extinctions
The fossil and paleoenvironmental record is rarely, if ever, good enough to detect the expected impacts of megafaunal extinctions, so much of the literature on these impacts is based on arguments by analogy with the extant megafauna, i.e. because extinct taxon X is similar to extant taxon Y, what is true for Y was also true for X (Table 2). These arguments are weakened in many cases, however, by our lack of understanding of the ecological roles of the extant species used for comparisons. On the
Prioritizing the conservation of the remaining megafauna
The megafauna are special: ecologically, as highlighted above, but also in terms of their evolutionary distinctiveness, since most species have few close relatives. All the largest mammalian megafaunal species are on the top-100 list of the EDGE project (Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered; www.edgeofexistence.org) and four Asian taxa (Sumatran and Javan rhinoceroses, Asian elephant, Malayan tapir) are in the top twenty. Megafauna are also special in terms of the charisma that
Conclusions
Caro et al. (2011), while acknowledging that “humans have had at least marginal influence on most if not all of the world’s biomes”, argue that large areas of the Earth’s surface still support more or less intact ecosystems. This review shows that, outside Africa, this is not only untrue now, but that it has not been true during the entire period of formal scientific enquiry in the tropics. Most tropical ecosystems we study and attempt to conserve were truncated long ago by size-selective
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz, Soumya Prasad, Kim MConkey, Chen Jin and David Westcott for useful discussions of these issues over the last decade. Three anonymous referees greatly improved the original version of this manuscript.
References (110)
Issues related to invasives in the Andaman Islands
J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc.
(2006)- et al.
Ancient diet of the Pleistocene gomphothere Notiomastodon platensis (Mammalia, Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae) from lowland mid-latitudes of South America: stereomicrowear and tooth calculus analyses combined
Quaternary Int.
(2012) - et al.
Current decline of the “dodo-tree”: a case of broken-down interactions with extinct species or the result of new interactions with alien invaders?
Recent zooarchaeological researches in the Philippines
J. Arkeol. Malay.
(1991)- et al.
Man the fat hunter: the demise of Homo erectus and the emergence of a new hominin lineage in the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 400 kyr) Levant
PLoS ONE
(2011) - et al.
Forest elephants: tree planters of the Congo
Biotropica
(2009) - et al.
Seed dispersal by Galápagos tortoises
J. Biogeogr.
(2012) - et al.
Springs and wire plants: anachronistic defences against Madagascar’s extinct elephant birds
Proc. Roy. Soc. B
(2007) - et al.
Diet and dietary preferences of the southern cassowary (Casuarius casuarius) in North Queensland, Australia
Biotropica
(2008) - et al.
Quaternary extinctions and their link to climate change
Mysterious Island: what killed Madagascar’s large native animals?
Nat. Hist.
Emus as non-standard seed dispersers and their potential for long-distance seed dispersal
Ecography
Shit happens (to be useful)! Use of elephant dung as habitat by amphibians
Biotropica
Megagardeners of the forest – the role of elephants in seed dispersal
Acta Oecol.
Asian tapirs are no elephants when it comes to seed dispersal
Biotropica
Conservation in the anthropocene
Conserv. Biol.
Large mammal fossil occurrences and associated archaeological evidence in Pleistocene contexts of peninsular India and Sri Lanka
Quaternary Int.
Biodiversity loss caused by invasive alien vertebrates
Z. Jagdwiss.
Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the oriental (Indomalayan) region
Biol. Rev.
Pollination or seed dispersal: which should we worry about most?
The Ecology of Tropical East Asia
Seed dispersal distances and plant migration potential in tropical East Asia
Biotropica
Megafaunal extinctions and their consequences in the tropical Indo-Pacific
Tropical Rainforests: An Ecological and Biogeographical Comparison
Origin of the elephants Elephas maximus L. of Borneo
Sarawak Mus. J.
A refined chronology of prehistoric Madagascar and the demise of the megafauna
Quaternary Sci. Rev.
A glance to the past: subfossils, stable isotopes, seed dispersal, and species loss in southern Madagascar
Am. J. Primatol.
Phylogeny and geography predict pathogen community similarity in wild primates and humans
Proc. Roy. Soc. B
The Palaeolithic Settlement of Asia
Did Komodo dragons evolve to eat pygmy elephants?
Nature
Homage to Linnaeus: how many parasites? How many hosts?
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Living in the land of ghosts: fruit traits and the importance of large mammals as seed dispersers in the Pantanal, Brazil
Pleistocene rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation
Am. Nat.
Satranala (Coryphoideae: Borasseae: Hyphaeninae), a new palm genus from Madagascar
Kew Bull.
The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists?
Proc. Roy. Soc. B
Late Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions
Feeding response of the Aldabra giant tortoise (Geochelone gigantea) to island plants showing heterophylly
J. Biogeogr.
Trophic downgrading of planet Earth
Science
Methane output of tortoises: its contribution to energy loss related to herbivore body mass
PLoS ONE
Dietary controls on extinction versus survival among avian megafauna in the late Pleistocene
Geology
Parks of the Pleistocene: recreating the Cerrado and the Pantanal with megafauna
Nat. Conserv.
Ghosts and orphans: Madagascar’s vanishing ecosystems
Resurrecting extinct interactions with extant substitutes
Curr. Biol.
Seed dispersal anachronisms: rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate
PLoS One
Amazonian forests need Indians and Caboclos
Orsis
The influence of tree canopies and elephants on sub-canopy vegetation in a savanna
Afr. J. Ecol.
The forgotten megafauna
Science
Elephants (and extinct relatives) as earth-movers and ecosystem engineers
Geomorphology
The re-introduction of large carnivores to the Eastern Cape, South Africa: an assessment
Oryx
Response of Quaternary rainforest vertebrates to climate change in Australia
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
Cited by (58)
Africa's drylands in a changing world: Challenges for wildlife conservation under climate and land-use changes in the Greater Etosha Landscape
2022, Global Ecology and ConservationThe prelude to the Holocene: tropical Asia during the Pleistocene
2021, Holocene Climate Change and EnvironmentLast lizard standing: The enigmatic persistence of the Komodo dragon
2019, Global Ecology and ConservationMajor perturbations in the Earth's forest ecosystems. Possible implications for global warming
2018, Earth-Science ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Defaunation or the loss of wildlife animal species (Dirzo et al., 2014) is a problem that is typical for forest biomes, more specifically of tropical ones, considering they are the major global terrestrial biodiversity hotspot (Giam et al., 2012; Lewis et al., 2015). The issue is in fact prehistoric (Corlett, 2013), as it is estimated that the initial impact of human colonization of tropical ecosystems (which started tens of thousands of years ago) led to megafauna losses of 18% in Africa and 83% in South America (Lewis et al., 2015). Alongside climate change, anthropic pressures continue to this day via various pathways like forests fragmentation, habitat destruction or overhunting (Kurten, 2013; Poulsen et al., 2013), favouring the so-called "empty forest syndrome" (Redford, 1992).
Finding the anthropocene in tropical forests
2018, AnthropoceneCitation Excerpt :This appears to have been most noticeable in regions that were more recently colonized by Homo sapiens, for example 18% of African megafauna disappeared compared to 83% in South America (Lewis et al., 2015). Pleistocene tropical forests possessed a number of medium and large vertebrates, including large-bodied Stegodon spp. across Southeast Asia, Gomphotherioidea (gomphotheres) and Megalonychid (ground sloths) in the Neotropics, and Diprotodontidae in Australia (Corlett, 2013; Prado et al., 2015). Although we know relatively little about the ecological preferences of these animals it is likely, as with African forest elephants today (Abernethy et al., 2013), that they played major roles in the maintenance of forest structure, mainly through vegetation disturbance, as well as in the long-distance dispersal of a number of key plant species.
Landscape-scale drivers of glacial ecosystem change in the montane forests of the eastern Andean flank, Ecuador
2018, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology