Skip to main content
Log in

Cilengitide with metronomic temozolomide, procarbazine, and standard radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter in ExCentric, an open-label phase II trial

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme with unmethylated MGMT promoter has a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 12 months. This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of combining the selective integrin inhibitor cilengitide with a combination of metronomic temozolomide and procarbazine for these patients. Eligible patients (newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed supratentorial glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter) were entered into this multicentre study. Cilengitide (2000 mg IV twice weekly) was commenced 1 week prior to radiotherapy combined with daily temozolomide (60 mg/m2) and procarbazine (50 or 100 mg) and, after 4 weeks’ break, followed by six adjuvant cycles of temozolomide (50–60 mg/m2) and procarbazine (50 or 100 mg) on days 1–20, every 28 days. Cilengitide was continued for up to 12 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint for efficacy was a 12-month overall survival rate of 65 %. Twenty-nine patients completed study treatment. Sixteen patients survived for 12 months or more, an overall survival rate of 55 %. The median overall survival was 14.5 months (95 % CI 11.1–19.6) and the median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95 % CI 6.1–8). Cilengitide combined with metronomic temozolomide and procarbazine in MGMT-promoter unmethylated glioblastoma did not improve survival compared with historical data and does not warrant further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro-oncology 14(suppl 5):v1–v49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Neyns B, Goldbrunner R, Schlegel U, Clement PM, Grabenbauer GG, Ochsenbein AF, Simon M, Dietrich P-Y (2010) Phase I/IIa study of cilengitide and temozolomide with concomitant radiotherapy followed by cilengitide and temozolomide maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2712–2718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoelzinger DB, Demuth T, Berens ME (2007) Autocrine factors that sustain glioma invasion and paracrine biology in the brain microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(21):1583–1593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stupack DG (2007) The biology of integrins. Oncology (Williston Park, NY) 21(9 Suppl 3):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schnell O, Krebs B, Wagner E, Romagna A, Beer AJ, Grau SJ, Thon N, Goetz C, Kretzschmar HA, Tonn JC (2008) Expression of integrin αvβ3 in gliomas correlates with tumor grade and is not restricted to tumor vasculature. Brain Pathol 18(3):378–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Roth P, Silginer M, Goodman SL, Hasenbach K, Thies S, Maurer G, Schraml P, Tabatabai G, Moch H, Tritschler I (2013) Integrin control of the transforming growth factor-β pathway in glioblastoma. Brain 136(2):564–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith J (2003) Cilengitide Merck. Curr Opin Investig Drugs (London, England: 2000) 4(6):741–745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nabors LB, Mikkelsen T, Rosenfeld SS, Hochberg F, Akella NS, Fisher JD, Cloud GA, Zhang Y, Carson K, Wittemer SM (2007) Phase I and correlative biology study of cilengitide in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 25(13):1651–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reardon DA, Fink KL, Mikkelsen T, Cloughesy TF, O’Neill A, Plotkin S, Glantz M, Ravin P, Raizer JJ, Rich KM (2008) Randomized phase II study of cilengitide, an integrin-targeting arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide, in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 26(34):5610–5617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nabors LB, Mikkelsen T, Hegi ME, Ye X, Batchelor T, Lesser G, Peereboom D, Rosenfeld MR, Olsen J, Brem S (2012) A safety run-in and randomized phase 2 study of cilengitide combined with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NABTT 0306). Cancer 118(22):5601–5607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikkelsen T, Brodie C, Finniss S, Berens ME, Rennert JL, Nelson K, Lemke N, Brown SL, Hahn D, Neuteboom B (2009) Radiation sensitization of glioblastoma by cilengitide has unanticipated schedule-dependency. Int J Cancer 124(11):2719–2727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vlassenbroeck I, Califice S, Diserens A-C, Migliavacca E, Straub J, Di Stefano I, Moreau F, Hamou M-F, Renard I, Delorenzi M (2008) Validation of real-time methylation-specific PCR to determine O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene promoter methylation in glioma. J Mol Diagn 10(4):332–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming TR (1982) One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics 43:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tolcher A, Gerson S, Denis L, Geyer C, Hammond L, Patnaik A, Goetz A, Schwartz G, Edwards T, Reyderman L (2003) Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer 88(7):1004–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurzen H, Schmitt S, Näher H, Möhler T (2003) Inhibition of angiogenesis by non-toxic doses of temozolomide. Anticancer Drugs 14(7):515–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wick W, Platten M, Weller M (2009) New (alternative) temozolomide regimens for the treatment of glioma. Neuro-oncology 11(1):69–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Souliotis VL, Kaila S, Boussiotis VA, Pangalis GA, Kyrtopoulos SA (1990) Accumulation of O6-methylguanine in human blood leukocyte DNA during exposure to procarbazine and its relationships with dose and repair. Cancer Res 50(9):2759–2764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valavanis C, Souliotis VL, Kyrtopoulos SA (1994) Differential effects of procarbazine and methylnitrosourea on the accumulation of O6-methylguanine and the depletion and recovery of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in rat tissues. Carcinogenesis 15(8):1681–1688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beith J, Cook R, Robinson B, Levi J, Bell D, Wheeler H (1997) Modulation of resistance to BCNU by depleting MGMT activity with procarbazine in patients with relapsed high grade gliomas. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 16:386

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silvani A, Lamperti E, Gaviani P, Eoli M, Fiumani A, Salmaggi A, Falcone C, Filippini G, Botturi A, Boiardi A (2008) Salvage chemotherapy with procarbazine and fotemustine combination in the treatment of temozolomide treated recurrent glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol 87(2):143–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yung W, Albright R, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados M, Brada M, Spence A, Hohl R, Shapiro W (2000) A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer 83(5):588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Newlands E, Foster T, Zaknoen S (2003) Phase 1 study of temozolamide (TMZ) combined with procarbazine (PCB) in patients with gliomas. Br J Cancer 89(2):248–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Quinn JA, Jiang SX, Reardon DA, Desjardins A, Vredenburgh JJ, Rich JN, Gururangan S, Friedman AH, Bigner DD, Sampson JH et al (2009) Phase II trial of temozolomide plus O6-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent, temozolomide-resistant malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1262–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, Stupp R, Hegi ME, Jaeckle KA, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Won M, Blumenthal DT et al (2013) Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 31(32):4085–4091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Shibui S, Narita Y, Mizusawa J, Beppu T, Ogasawara K, Sawamura Y, Kobayashi H, Nishikawa R, Mishima K, Muragaki Y (2013) Randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with nimustine (ACNU) versus nimustine plus procarbazine for newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma (JCOG0305). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71(2):511–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrlinger U, Rieger J, Koch D, Loeser S, Blaschke B, Kortmann R-D, Steinbach JP, Hundsberger T, Wick W, Meyermann R et al (2006) Phase II trial of lomustine plus temozolomide chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: UKT-03. J Clin Oncol 24(27):4412–4417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Glas M, Happold C, Rieger J, Wiewrodt D, Bähr O, Steinbach JP, Wick W, Kortmann R-D, Reifenberger G, Weller M et al (2009) Long-term survival of patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy and lomustine plus temozolomide. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1257–1261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grossman SA, Ye X, Piantadosi S, Desideri S, Nabors LB, Rosenfeld M, Fisher J (2010) Survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide in research studies in the United States. Clin Cancer Res 16(8):2443–2449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by an independent research grant from Merck Serono (Merck KGaA), Darmstadt, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Khasraw.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The institutions of MK, SM, ZK, AL, M Back and HW (RNSH) received research funding from Merck Serono/Merck KGaA for the conduct of this study. Marc Buyse is an employee of IDDI (International Drug Development Institute) and holds stock in IDDI. MK and HW have served on Roche GBM advisory board. MK has served on Abbvie GBM advisory board. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1: Modified Macdonald criteria for radiologic assessment

Appendix 1: Modified Macdonald criteria for radiologic assessment

The primary criterion for assessment of efficacy was median overall survival. Further clinical activity, measured as progression-free survival and response, was assessed by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, neurologic examination, and steroid use, as outlined in the table:

Clinical status

Clinical activity assessments

Neuroimaging Gd-MRI

Neurologic examination

Steroid use

Complete response

Disappearance of all enhancing tumor, and

No new lesions

Stable or improved compared to the most recent neurologic examination

None

Partial response

≥50 % reduction in the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of enhancing tumour compared to the baseline sum,

No worsening of an evaluable lesion(s), and

No new lesions

Stable or improved compared to the most recent neurologic examination

Same or lower dose compared to the dose at previous scan, and

Dose is stable for ≥72 h prior to each scan

Progressive disease

≥25 % increase in the sum of the product of the largest perpendicular diameters of enhancing tumour compared to the smallest prior sum,

Worsening of an evaluable lesion(s), or

Any new lesion(s)

Worsening compared to the most recent neurological examination [3]

Increasing dose of steroids may be taken into account for judgment

Stable disease

Neither response (complete or partial) nor progressive disease

  1. To qualify as a complete or partial response, all three criteria of neuroimaging, neurological examination, and steroid use, were required

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khasraw, M., Lee, A., McCowatt, S. et al. Cilengitide with metronomic temozolomide, procarbazine, and standard radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter in ExCentric, an open-label phase II trial. J Neurooncol 128, 163–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2094-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2094-0

Keywords

Navigation