Skip to main content
Log in

Linking Callous-Unemotional Traits to Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Forms of Aggression

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigated the relation of callous-unemotional (CU) traits to bullying, victimization, and proactive and reactive aggression. We also examined whether CU traits will be more strongly related to groups of children exhibiting combined or pure forms of proactive and reactive aggression and combined or pure forms of bullying and victimization. The findings suggested that the presence of CU traits, which consists of three dimensions of behavior, uncaring, callousness, and unemotional, may designate important subgroups of aggressive children. Evidence suggested that the adolescents characterized by higher levels of CU traits were more likely to exhibit combined proactive and reactive aggression in comparison to pure forms of proactive or reactive aggression. Additionally, bullies scored higher on the uncaring dimension, and bully-victims (adolescents exhibiting both bullying and victimization) scored higher on the callous dimension. In contrast, victims of bullying scored lower on the uncaring dimension of behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These multinomial regression analyses required the formation of groups. While such analyses are very helpful for making person-centered interpretations (e.g., describing how youth who both bully and are victims differ from pure groups), there can be a loss of power due to the dichotomization of continuous variables. Thus, we also conducted a number of hierarchical linear regression analyses with the ICU total scale and the subscales as the outcomes and we tested the main and interactive effects of (a) bullying and victimization and (b) proactive and reactive aggression. In all the analyses we controlled for demographics in step 1 and in step 2 we entered main effects of bullying and victimization or proactive and reactive aggression. In step 3 we included the interaction between bullying and victimization or between proactive and reactive aggression. The findings were consistent with the multinomial regressions reported. Specifically, bullying and victimization significantly predicted the ICU total scale and the uncaring subscale. The bullying variable was also significantly related to the callous subscale. The interactions suggested that adolescents, who scored high in bullying, no matter their levels of victimization, were characterized by high CU traits and also score high on the callous subscale. Children who scored high in bullying, but low in victimization scored higher on the uncaring subscale in comparison to everybody else. In terms of proactive and reactive aggression, only proactive aggression was positively related to the ICU total scale and the uncaring subscale. Both proactive and reactive aggression were related to the callous subscale. The interactions suggested that adolescents, who scored high in proactive aggression, irrespective of their levels of reactive aggression, were characterized by high CU traits and they scored high on the callous subscale.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. P., McElhaney, K. B., Kuperminc, G. P., & Jodl, K. M. (2004). Stability and change in attachment security across adolescence. Child Development, 75(6), 1792–1805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. S., Stanford, M. S., Dowdy, L., Liebman, M. J., & Kent, T. A. (1999). Impulsive and premeditated aggression: a factoranalysis of self reported acts. Psychiatry Research, 86, 163–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., Atkins, M. S., Osborne, M. L., & Milnamow, M. (1996). A revised teacher rating scale for reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24(4), 473–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. D., Loeber, R., & Lahey, B. B. (2007). Adolescent Conduct Disorder and Interpersonal Callousness as Predictors of Psychopathy in Young Adults. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 36, 334–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Terwogt, M. M., & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11(3), 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, A. G., & Merrell, K. W. (2001). Bullying in schools: Perspective on understanding and preventing an international problem. School Psychology International, 22(3), 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Saint Louis: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783–790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression in the development and treatment of childhood aggression. In D. J. Pepler, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1146–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J. F., Campbell, J. S., & Weir, J. M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J., Skeem, J., Cruise, K., & Cauffman, E. (2001). The assessment of juvenile psychopathy and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enebrink, P., Andershed, H., & Langström, N. (2005). Callous-unemotional traits are associated with clinical severity in referred boys with conduct problems. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 59, 431–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37– 61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essau, C. A., Sasagawa, S., & Frick, P. J. (2006). Callous-unemotional traits in community sample of adolescents. Assessment, 13, 454–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, K. A. (2008). Development and co-development of aggressive and depressive psychopathology: Infancy to early adolescence. Saarbruecken: VDM Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P.Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry, & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice (pp. 381–458). Chicago: Chicago University press.

  • Frick, P. J. (2004). The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Unpublished rating scale.

  • Frick, P. J. (2006). Developmental pathways to conduct disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15(2), 311–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., Bodin, S. D., & Barry, C. T. (2000). Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children: Further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychological Assessment, 12(4), 382–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., Cornell, A. H., Barry, C. T., Bodin, S. D., & Dane, H. E. (2003). Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(4), 457–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., & Dickens, C. (2006). Current Perspectives on Conduct Disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 8, 59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D. (2001). The Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., & White, S. F. (2008). The importance of callous-unemotional traits for the development of aggressive and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 359–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, J. M., Desrochers, S., & Devall, E. L. (2001). Comparison of role demands, relationships, and child functioning in single-mother, single father, and intact families. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 35(1–2), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparametrized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. H., Meyers, J., Jarrett, O., & Neel, J. (2005). Student Survey of Bullying Behavior: Preliminary Development and Results from Six Elementary Schools. Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia State University, Center for Research on School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimonis, E. R., Frick, P. J., Skeem, J., Marsee, M. A., Cruise, K., Munoz, L. C., Aucoin, K. J., & Morris, A. S. (2008). Assessing callous-unemotional traits in adolescent offenders: Validation of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Journal of the International Association of Psychiatry and Law, 31(3), 241–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinos, C. M., & Panayiotou, G. (2004). Predicting bullying and victimization among early adolescents: Associations with disruptive behavior disorders. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruh, I. P., Frick, P. J., & Clements, C. B. (2005). Historical and personality correlates to the violence patterns of juveniles tried as adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loney, B. R., Frick, P. J., Clements, C. B., Ellis, M. L., & Kerlin, K. (2003). Callous- unemotional traits, impulsivity, and emotional processing in antisocial adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 66–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 155–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence, & reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, L. C., Frick, P. J., Kimonis, E. R., & Aucoin, K. J. (2008). Types of aggression, responsiveness to provocation, and callous-unemotional traits in detained adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 15–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2007). Mplus User’ s Guide. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottelman, E. D., & Jensen, P. S. (1995). Comorbidity of disorders in children and adolescents: Developmental perspectives. In T. H. Ollendick, & R. J. Prinz (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (vol. Vol. 17, (pp. 109–155)). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offord, D. R., Boyle, M. H., & Racine, Y. A. (1991). The epidemiology of antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence. In D. J. Pepler, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 31–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardini, D. A., Lochman, J. E., & Frick, P. J. (2003). Callous/unemotional traits and social cognitive processes in adjudicated youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(3), 364–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelligrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polman, H., Orobio de Castro, B., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W. (2007). A meta- analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 522–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S., & Woodworth, M. (2006). Psychopathy and aggression. In C. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 481–494). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. M., & Dodge, K. A. (1989). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimension. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17(4), 455–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulkkinen, L. (1996). Proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence as precursors to anti- and prosocial behaviors in young adults. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Raynolds, C., et al. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlated of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K. (2002). New perspective on bullying. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salimivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chicn, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. (147–174)). New York/London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, M. E., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (2007). Bullies and victims at school: Are they the same pupils? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 441–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Hunt, M. H. (2006). Student Survey of Bullying Behavior -Revised 2 (SSBB-R2). Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia State University, Center for Research on School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitacco, M. J., Rogers, R., & Neuman, C. S. (2003). The anstisocial processing screening device: An examination of its construct and convergent validity. Assessment, 10, 143–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2002). Reactively and proactively aggressive children: Antecedent and subsequent characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(4), 495–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Gendreau, P. L., Tremblay, R. E., & Oligny, P. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 377–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Youngstrom, E., Findling, R., & Calabrese, J. (2003). Who are the comorbid adolescents? Agreement between psychiatric diagnosis, youth, parent, and teacher report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(3), 231–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1987). Violence: Psychopaths and their victims. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 19, 454–462.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostas A. Fanti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanti, K.A., Frick, P.J. & Georgiou, S. Linking Callous-Unemotional Traits to Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Forms of Aggression. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 31, 285–298 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9111-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9111-3

Keywords

Navigation