Skip to main content
Log in

Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Multiple left ventricular pacing strategies have been suggested for improving response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, these programming strategies may sometimes entail accepting configurations with high pacing threshold and accelerated battery drain. We assessed the feasibility of predefined pacing programming protocols, and we evaluated their impact on device longevity and their cost-impact.

Methods

We estimated battery longevity in 167 CRT-D patients based on measured pacing parameters according to multiple alternative programming strategies: single-site pacing associated with lowest threshold, non-apical location, longest interventricular delay, and pacing from two electrodes. To determine the economic impact of each programming strategy, we applied the results of a model-based cost analysis using a 15-year time horizon.

Results

Selecting the electrode with the lowest threshold resulted in a median device longevity of 11.5 years. Non-apical pacing and interventricular delay maximization were feasible in most patients and were obtained at the price of a few months of battery life. Device longevity of > 10 years was preserved in 87% of cases of non-apical pacing and in 77% on pacing at the longest interventricular delay. The mean reduction in battery life when the second electrode was activated was 1.5 years. Single-site pacing strategies increased the therapy cost by 4–6%, and multi-site pacing by 12–13%, in comparison with the lowest-cost scenario.

Conclusions

Modern CRT-D systems ensure effective pacing and allow multiple optimization strategies for maximizing service life or for enhancing effectiveness. Single- or multi-site pacing strategies can be implemented without compromising device service life and at an acceptable increase in therapy cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, Dresing T, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT, Reek S, Kuniss M, Quesada A, et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:1159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Onofrio A, Botto G, Mantica M, La Rosa C, Occhetta E, Verlato R, et al. The interventricular conduction time is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: interventricular electrical delay. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5067–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, Ellenbogen KA, Yu Y, Meyer TE, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertini M, Mele D, Malagù M, Fiorencis A, Toselli T, Casadei F, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1375–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilton SB, Shibata MA, Sondergaard R, Cowan K, Semeniuk L, Exner DV. Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;23:219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilton SB, Exner DV, Healey JS, Birnie D, Arnold MO, Sapp JL, et al. Left ventricular lead position and outcomes in the resynchronization-defibrillation for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT). Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, Gardini B, Mazzotti A, Massaro G, et al. Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stabile G, D'Onofrio A, Pepi P, De Simone A, Santamaria M, Caico SI, et al. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boriani G, Merino J, Wright DJ, Gadler F, Schaer B, Landolina M. Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA. Europace. 2018;20:1882–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, et al. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:394–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Deharo JC, Leyva F, Lubinski A, Lazzaro C. Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon. Europace. 2013;15:1453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Molfetta AD, Santini L, Romeo F. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Forleo GB, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, et al. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1822–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Parisi Q, Martino A, et al. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Bharmi R, Dalal N, Panattoni G, Pollastrelli A, et al. Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study. Europace. 2015;17:101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mittal S, Nair D, Padanilam BJ, Ciuffo A, Gupta N, Gallagher P, et al. Performance of anatomically designed Quadripolar left ventricular leads: results from the NAVIGATE X4 clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Philippon F, Liu L, Fung JW, Deharo JC, Anselme F, Delnoy PP, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:438–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mele D, Nardozza M, Malagù M, Leonetti E, Fragale C, Rondinella A, et al. Left ventricular Lead position guided by parametric strain echocardiography improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:1001–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thébault C, Donal E, Meunier C, Gervais R, Gerritse B, Gold MR, et al. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2662–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rinaldi CA, Burri H, Thibault B, Curnis A, Rao A, Gras D, et al. A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2015;17:7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thibault B, Dubuc M, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, et al. Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Europace. 2013;15:984–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Landolina M, Curnis A, Morani G, Vado A, Ammendola E, D'onofrio A, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer. Europace. 2015;17:1251–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. von Gunten S, Schaer BA, Yap SC, Szili-Torok T, Kühne M, Sticherling C, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a comparison among manufacturers and over time. Europace. 2016;18(5):710–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Boriani G, Ritter P, Biffi M, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I, Martignani C, et al. Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database. Europace. 2016;18:1366–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hauser RG. The growing mismatch between patient longevity and the service life of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2022–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Akerström F, Narváez I, Puchol A, Pachón M, Martín-Sierra C, Rodríguez-Mañero M, et al. Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice. Europace. 2018;20:1161–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Landolina M, Morani G, Curnis A, Vado A, D'Onofrio A, Bianchi V, et al. The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives. Europace. 2017;19(8):1349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. NICE Guidance. ENDURALIFE powered CRT-D devices for treating heart failure medical technologies guidance published. nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg33 (19 April 2019, date last accessed).

  32. Gadler F, Ding Y, Verin N, Bergius M, Miller JD, Lenhart GM, et al. Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:657–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio D’Onofrio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M. Campari and S. Valsecchi are employees of Boston Scientific, Inc. No other conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 26 kb).

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 List of participating centers and investigators

AORN - OSPEDALE DEI COLLI - P.O. MONALDI - NAPOLI: A. D’Onofrio, V. Bianchi, V. Tavoletta; ARCISPEDALE S. ANNA - FERRARA: M. bertini, M. Malagù; OSPEDALE S. ANNA - CATANZARO: T. Infusino; OSPEDALI RIUNITI DI FOGGIA - FOGGIA: G. D’Arienzo, L. C. Ziccardi, A. Nardella, R. Petrucci, L. D’Arienzo, A. Ricco; AOU RIUNITI - TORRETTE DI ANCONA: A. Capucci, L. Cipolletta, M. Luzi; P.O. MUSCATELLO - AUGUSTA (SR): G. Licciardello, G. Busacca; OSPEDALE SAN GIOVANNI BATTISTA - FOLIGNO: G. Savarese, C. Andreoli; OSPEDALE S. LEONARDO - CASTELLAMMARE DI STABIA (NA): G. Russo, S. Mennella, R. Chianese, E. Zingone; CAMPUS BIOMEDICO - ROMA: D. Ricciardi, V. Calabrese; A.O. UNIVERSITARIA S. GIOVANNI DI DIO E RUGGI D’ARAGONA - SALERNO: M. Manzo, C. Esposito, F. Esposito, D. Ferraioli, F. Franculli; OSPEDALE INFERMI - RIMINI: F. Fabbri, D. Saporito; P.O. ZONA ARETINA OSPEDALE S. DONATO - AREZZO (AR): P. Notarstefano, M. Nesti, A. Fraticelli, R. Guida, A. Fabiani; OSPEDALE G.B. GRASSI - OSTIA (RM): L. Santini, F. Ammirati, K. Mahfouz, V. Schirripa; CLINICA MEDITERRANEA S.P.A. - NAPOLI: G. Stabile, A. Iuliano; OSPEDALE CIVILE DI VOGHERA - VOGHERA: P. Broglia, C. Bosatra; OSPEDALE VITO FAZZI - LECCE: E. Pisanò; NUOVO OSPEDALE S. STEFANO - PRATO: T. Giovannini, F. Frascarelli; OSPEDALE CIVILE CIVITANOVA MARCHE (MC): D. Spagnolo; AZIENDA UNIVERSITARIA POLICLINICO UMBERTO I - ROMA: A. Piro, C. Lavalle; OSPEDALE SS.TRINITA’ - BORGOMANERO: S. Maffé; OSPEDALE G. PANICO - TRICASE: P. Palmisano, M. Accogli; CLINICA MONTEVERGINE - MERCOGLIANO (AV): F. Solimene; OSPEDALE SACCO - MILANO: G.B. Forleo, L. Lombardi; Ospedale S. CROCE e CARLE - CUNEO: E. Menardi; OSPEDALE CAMPO MARTE - LUCCA: D. Giorgi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Onofrio, A., Bertini, M., Infusino, T. et al. Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 60, 195–203 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00711-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00711-3

Keywords

Navigation