Abstract
Background
Multiple left ventricular pacing strategies have been suggested for improving response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, these programming strategies may sometimes entail accepting configurations with high pacing threshold and accelerated battery drain. We assessed the feasibility of predefined pacing programming protocols, and we evaluated their impact on device longevity and their cost-impact.
Methods
We estimated battery longevity in 167 CRT-D patients based on measured pacing parameters according to multiple alternative programming strategies: single-site pacing associated with lowest threshold, non-apical location, longest interventricular delay, and pacing from two electrodes. To determine the economic impact of each programming strategy, we applied the results of a model-based cost analysis using a 15-year time horizon.
Results
Selecting the electrode with the lowest threshold resulted in a median device longevity of 11.5 years. Non-apical pacing and interventricular delay maximization were feasible in most patients and were obtained at the price of a few months of battery life. Device longevity of > 10 years was preserved in 87% of cases of non-apical pacing and in 77% on pacing at the longest interventricular delay. The mean reduction in battery life when the second electrode was activated was 1.5 years. Single-site pacing strategies increased the therapy cost by 4–6%, and multi-site pacing by 12–13%, in comparison with the lowest-cost scenario.
Conclusions
Modern CRT-D systems ensure effective pacing and allow multiple optimization strategies for maximizing service life or for enhancing effectiveness. Single- or multi-site pacing strategies can be implemented without compromising device service life and at an acceptable increase in therapy cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Europace. 2013;15:1070–118.
Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, Dresing T, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.
Singh JP, Klein HU, Huang DT, Reek S, Kuniss M, Quesada A, et al. Left ventricular lead position and clinical outcome in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial-cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:1159–66.
D'Onofrio A, Botto G, Mantica M, La Rosa C, Occhetta E, Verlato R, et al. The interventricular conduction time is associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: interventricular electrical delay. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5067–8.
Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, Ellenbogen KA, Yu Y, Meyer TE, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–24.
Bertini M, Mele D, Malagù M, Fiorencis A, Toselli T, Casadei F, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1375–82.
Wilton SB, Shibata MA, Sondergaard R, Cowan K, Semeniuk L, Exner DV. Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;23:219–27.
Wilton SB, Exner DV, Healey JS, Birnie D, Arnold MO, Sapp JL, et al. Left ventricular lead position and outcomes in the resynchronization-defibrillation for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT). Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:413–9.
Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, Gardini B, Mazzotti A, Massaro G, et al. Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1201–8.
Stabile G, D'Onofrio A, Pepi P, De Simone A, Santamaria M, Caico SI, et al. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2221–9.
Boriani G, Merino J, Wright DJ, Gadler F, Schaer B, Landolina M. Battery longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: technical, clinical and economic aspects. An expert review paper from EHRA. Europace. 2018;20:1882–97.
Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, et al. Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:394–401.
Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Deharo JC, Leyva F, Lubinski A, Lazzaro C. Impact of extending device longevity on the long-term costs of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a modelling study with a 15-year time horizon. Europace. 2013;15:1453–62.
Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, Molfetta AD, Santini L, Romeo F. Left ventricular pacing with a new quadripolar transvenous lead for CRT: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:31–7.
Forleo GB, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Della Rocca DG, Papavasileiou LP, et al. Clinical and procedural outcome of patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead: early results of a prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1822–8.
Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Parisi Q, Martino A, et al. Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:59–66.
Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Bharmi R, Dalal N, Panattoni G, Pollastrelli A, et al. Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study. Europace. 2015;17:101–7.
Mittal S, Nair D, Padanilam BJ, Ciuffo A, Gupta N, Gallagher P, et al. Performance of anatomically designed Quadripolar left ventricular leads: results from the NAVIGATE X4 clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1199–205.
Philippon F, Liu L, Fung JW, Deharo JC, Anselme F, Delnoy PP, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38:438–47.
Mele D, Nardozza M, Malagù M, Leonetti E, Fragale C, Rondinella A, et al. Left ventricular Lead position guided by parametric strain echocardiography improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:1001–11.
Thébault C, Donal E, Meunier C, Gervais R, Gerritse B, Gold MR, et al. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2662–71.
Rinaldi CA, Burri H, Thibault B, Curnis A, Rao A, Gras D, et al. A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2015;17:7–17.
Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, et al. Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace. 2017;19:1170–7.
Thibault B, Dubuc M, Khairy P, Guerra PG, Macle L, Rivard L, et al. Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Europace. 2013;15:984–91.
Landolina M, Curnis A, Morani G, Vado A, Ammendola E, D'onofrio A, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy in current clinical practice: an analysis according to influencing factors, device generation, and manufacturer. Europace. 2015;17:1251–8.
von Gunten S, Schaer BA, Yap SC, Szili-Torok T, Kühne M, Sticherling C, et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a comparison among manufacturers and over time. Europace. 2016;18(5):710–7.
Boriani G, Ritter P, Biffi M, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I, Martignani C, et al. Battery drain in daily practice and medium-term projections on longevity of cardioverter-defibrillators: an analysis from a remote monitoring database. Europace. 2016;18:1366–73.
Hauser RG. The growing mismatch between patient longevity and the service life of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2022–5.
Akerström F, Narváez I, Puchol A, Pachón M, Martín-Sierra C, Rodríguez-Mañero M, et al. Estimation of the effects of multipoint pacing on battery longevity in routine clinical practice. Europace. 2018;20:1161–7.
Landolina M, Morani G, Curnis A, Vado A, D'Onofrio A, Bianchi V, et al. The economic impact of battery longevity in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the hospital and healthcare system perspectives. Europace. 2017;19(8):1349–56.
NICE Guidance. ENDURALIFE powered CRT-D devices for treating heart failure medical technologies guidance published. nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg33 (19 April 2019, date last accessed).
Gadler F, Ding Y, Verin N, Bergius M, Miller JD, Lenhart GM, et al. Economic impact of longer battery life of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators in Sweden. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;8:657–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Campari and S. Valsecchi are employees of Boston Scientific, Inc. No other conflicts of interest exist.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 26 kb).
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 List of participating centers and investigators
AORN - OSPEDALE DEI COLLI - P.O. MONALDI - NAPOLI: A. D’Onofrio, V. Bianchi, V. Tavoletta; ARCISPEDALE S. ANNA - FERRARA: M. bertini, M. Malagù; OSPEDALE S. ANNA - CATANZARO: T. Infusino; OSPEDALI RIUNITI DI FOGGIA - FOGGIA: G. D’Arienzo, L. C. Ziccardi, A. Nardella, R. Petrucci, L. D’Arienzo, A. Ricco; AOU RIUNITI - TORRETTE DI ANCONA: A. Capucci, L. Cipolletta, M. Luzi; P.O. MUSCATELLO - AUGUSTA (SR): G. Licciardello, G. Busacca; OSPEDALE SAN GIOVANNI BATTISTA - FOLIGNO: G. Savarese, C. Andreoli; OSPEDALE S. LEONARDO - CASTELLAMMARE DI STABIA (NA): G. Russo, S. Mennella, R. Chianese, E. Zingone; CAMPUS BIOMEDICO - ROMA: D. Ricciardi, V. Calabrese; A.O. UNIVERSITARIA S. GIOVANNI DI DIO E RUGGI D’ARAGONA - SALERNO: M. Manzo, C. Esposito, F. Esposito, D. Ferraioli, F. Franculli; OSPEDALE INFERMI - RIMINI: F. Fabbri, D. Saporito; P.O. ZONA ARETINA OSPEDALE S. DONATO - AREZZO (AR): P. Notarstefano, M. Nesti, A. Fraticelli, R. Guida, A. Fabiani; OSPEDALE G.B. GRASSI - OSTIA (RM): L. Santini, F. Ammirati, K. Mahfouz, V. Schirripa; CLINICA MEDITERRANEA S.P.A. - NAPOLI: G. Stabile, A. Iuliano; OSPEDALE CIVILE DI VOGHERA - VOGHERA: P. Broglia, C. Bosatra; OSPEDALE VITO FAZZI - LECCE: E. Pisanò; NUOVO OSPEDALE S. STEFANO - PRATO: T. Giovannini, F. Frascarelli; OSPEDALE CIVILE CIVITANOVA MARCHE (MC): D. Spagnolo; AZIENDA UNIVERSITARIA POLICLINICO UMBERTO I - ROMA: A. Piro, C. Lavalle; OSPEDALE SS.TRINITA’ - BORGOMANERO: S. Maffé; OSPEDALE G. PANICO - TRICASE: P. Palmisano, M. Accogli; CLINICA MONTEVERGINE - MERCOGLIANO (AV): F. Solimene; OSPEDALE SACCO - MILANO: G.B. Forleo, L. Lombardi; Ospedale S. CROCE e CARLE - CUNEO: E. Menardi; OSPEDALE CAMPO MARTE - LUCCA: D. Giorgi.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Onofrio, A., Bertini, M., Infusino, T. et al. Single- and multi-site pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy: impact on device longevity and therapy cost. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 60, 195–203 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00711-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00711-3