Abstract
Alien aquatic plant species have had spectacular success in invading New Zealand’s freshwaters. Their continued introduction has resulted in few water bodies retaining their natural or original indigenous aquatic vegetation, and associated adverse changes, such as reduced biodiversity and amenity values are well known. This highlights the need to accurately assess aquatic plant species that are already in the country and those outside for their potential to have a negative impact on New Zealand’s lakes and waterways. The study presented in this paper describes an approach to evaluating the invasive weed potential of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle compared with Elodea canadensis Michx. under flowing water conditions. The two species were planted in combination and alone, and in a sheltered or exposed position relative to the direction of the water flow. Over the 2-year study, two different waterflow rates were used (0.1 and 0.2 m/s) which represented the gauged flows from a stream of interest that contains E. canadensis and flows from a H. verticillata infested lake. H. verticillata was competitive compared with E. canadensis and able to persist and thrive in the presence of E. canadensis in both exposed and sheltered habitats. These results corroborate observations from other countries of H. verticillata growing in flowing waters and highlight the significant threat posed by H. verticillata to streams and waterways in New Zealand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burnett, D. A., P. D. Champion, J. S. Clayton & J. Ogden, 2007. A system for investigation of the temperature responses of emergent aquatic plants. Aquatic Botany 86: 187–190.
Champion, P. D. & J. S. Clayton, 2001. A weed risk assessment for aquatic weeds in New Zealand. In Groves, R. H., F. D. Panetta & J. G. Virtue (eds), Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, VIC: 194–202.
Champion, P., D. Hofstra & J. Clayton, 2007. Border Control for Potential Aquatic Weeds. Stage 3. Weed Risk Management. Science for Conservation 271. Department of Conservation, Wellington.
Coffey, B. T. & J. S. Clayton, 1988. New Zealand Waterplants. Ruakura Agricultural centre, MAF Tech, Hamilton.
Floerl, O. & G. J. Inglis, 2005. Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biological Invasions 7: 589–606.
Haller, W. T. & D. L. Sutton, 1975. Community structure and competition between Hydrilla and Vallisneria. Hyacinth Control Journal 13: 48–50.
Hofstra, D. E., J. Clayton, J. D. Green & M. Auger, 1999. Competitive performance of Hydrilla verticillata in New Zealand. Aquatic Botany 63: 305–324.
Johnstone, I. M., B. T. Coffey & C. Howard-Williams, 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. Journal of Environmental Management 20: 263–279.
Langeland, K. A., 1996. Hydrilla verticillata (Lf) Royle (Hydrocharitaceae), a perfect aquatic weed. Castanea 61: 293–304.
Mony, C., T. J. Koschnick, W. T. Haller & S. Muller, 2007. Competition between two invasive Hydrocharitaceae (Hydrilla verticillata (Lf) Royle) and Egeria densa (Planch)) as influenced by sediment fertility and season. Aquatic Botany 86: 236–242.
Roley, S. S. & R. M. Newman, 2008. Predicting Eurasian watermilfoil invasions in Minnesota. Lake and Reservoir Management 24: 361–369.
Steward, K. K., 1991. Competitive interaction between monoeciuos Hydrilla and American Eelgrass on sediments of varying fertility. Florida Scientist 54: 135–147.
Van, T. K., G. S. Wheeler & T. D. Center, 1999. Competition between Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria americana as influenced by soil fertility. Aquatic Botany 62: 225–233.
Van Dijk, G. M., D. D. Thayer & W. T. Haller, 1986. Growth of Hygrophila and Hydrilla in flowing water. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 24: 85–87.
Wang, J. W., D. Yu, W. Xiong & Y. Q. Han, 2008. Above and belowground competition between two submersed macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 67: 113–122.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology, and the contribution of the Aquatic Plant Group at NIWA for the collection of plants. Particular thanks also go to Charly Draper, Sam Bullen and Stephan Heubeck who undertook different aspects of experimental setup, monitoring and harvesting, and to Gareth van Assema, who gauged water velocity in the raceway, and NIWA Napier staff who gauged water velocity in the outflow stream and Neil Cox (AgResearch) for his statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Guest editors: A. Pieterse, S. Hellsten, J. Newman, J. Caffrey, F. Ecke, T. Ferreira, B. Gopal, J. Haury, G. Janauer, T. Kairesalo, A. Kanninen, K. Karttunen, J. Sarvala, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Toivonen, L. Triest, P. Uotila, N. Willby / Aquatic Invasions and Relation to Environmental Changes: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, European Weed Research Society
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofstra, D., Champion, P. & Clayton, J. Predicting invasive success of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle in flowing water. Hydrobiologia 656, 213–219 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0445-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0445-y