Skip to main content
Log in

Atrial longitudinal strain parameters predict left atrial reverse remodeling after mitral valve surgery: a speckle tracking echocardiography study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volume overload in chronic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) causes left atrial (LA) remodeling. Volume overload generally diminishes after mitral valve surgery and LA size and shape are expected to recover. The recovery of LA functions named as reverse remodeling is said to be related with prognosis and mortality. A few clinical and echocardiographic parameters have been reported to be associated with LA reverse remodeling. In this study, we investigated the relationship between LA peak longitudinal strain (reservoir strain) assessed with 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D STE) and LA reverse remodeling. 53 patients (24 females and 29 males, mean age: 45.7 ± 13.5 years) with severe MR and preserved left ventricular systolic function were included in the study. All patients had normal sinus rhythm. The etiology of MR was mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in 37 patients and rheumatic valvular disease in 16 patients. Mitral valve repair was performed in 30 patients while 23 underwent mitral valve replacement. Echocardiography was performed before the surgery and 6 months later. LA peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was assessed with speckle tracking imaging. LA reverse remodeling was defined as a percent of decrease in LA volume index (LAVI). Left atrial volume index significantly decreased after surgery (58.2 ± 16.6 vs. 43.9 ± 17.2 ml/m2, p ≤ 0.001). Mean LAVI reduction was 22.5 ± 27.2 %. There was no significant difference in LAVI reduction between mitral repair and replacement groups (22.1 ± 22.6 vs. 23.1 ± 32.8 %, p = 0.9). Although the decrease in LAVI was higher in MVP group than rheumatic group, it was not statistically significant (24.4 ± 26.8 vs. 18.2 ± 28.9 %, p = 0.4). Correlates of LAVI reduction were preoperative LAVI (r 0.28, p = 0.039), PALS (r 0.36, p = 0.001) and age (r −0.36, p = 0.007). Furthermore, in multivariate linear regression analysis (entering models), preoperative LAVI, age and PALS were all significant predictors of LA reverse remodeling (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.04, p = 0.001 respectively). Left atrial peak longitudinal strain measured by 2D STE, in conjunction with preoperative LAVI and age is a predictor of LA reverse remodeling in patients undergoing surgery for severe MR. We suggest that in this patient population, PALS may also be used as a preoperative prognostic marker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EF:

Ejection fraction

LA:

Left atrium

LAVI:

Left atrial volume index

LV:

Left ventricle

PALS:

Peak atrial longitudinal strain

PACS:

Peak atrial contraction strain

MVP:

Mitral valve prolapse

MVR:

Mitral valve replacement

TVR:

Tricuspid valve repair

PISA:

Proximal isovelocity surface area

STE:

Speckle tracking echocardiography

ASE:

American Society of Echocardiography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

BNP:

Brain natriuretic peptide

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

References

  1. Anne W, Willems R, Roskams T et al (2005) Matrix metalloproteinases and atrial remodeling in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 67:655–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verheule S, Wilson E, Everett T et al (2003) Alterations in atrial electrophysiology and tissue structure in a canine model of chronic atrial dilatation due to mitral regurgitation. Circulation 107:2615–2622

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ et al (1995) Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 92:835–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Bailey KR et al (2001) Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women. Mayo Clin Proc 76:467–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Seward JB et al (2004) Left atrial volume in the prediction of first ischemic stroke in an elderly cohort without atrial fibrillation. Mayo Clin Proc 79:1008–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK et al (2003) Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 107:2207–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pritchett AM, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW et al (2003) Left atrial volume as an index of left atrial size: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lester SJ, Ryan EW, Schiller NB et al (1999) Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. Am J Cardiol 84:829–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodevan O, Bjornerheim R, Ljosland M et al (1999) Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates. Int J Card Imaging 15:397–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vianna-Pinton R, Moreno CA, Baxter CM et al (2009) Two dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography of the left atrium: feasibility and regional contraction and relaxation differences in normal subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saraiva RM, Demirkol S, Buakhamsri A et al (2010) Left atrial strain measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking represents a new tool to evaluate left atrial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:172–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cameli M, Caputo M, Mondillo S et al (2009) Feasibility and reference values of left atrial longitudinal strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle tracking. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 7:6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karabay CY, Zehir R, Güler A et al (2013) Left atrial deformation parameters predict left atrial appendage function and thrombus in patients in sinus rhythm with suspected cardioembolic stroke: a speckle tracking and transesophageal echocardiography study. Echocardiography 30(5):572–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Candan O, Ozdemir N, Aung SM et al (2013) Left atrial longitudinal strain parameters predict postoperative persistent atrial fibrillation following mitral valve surgery: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Echocardiography 30(9):1061–1068

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cameli M, Lisi M, Righini FM et al (2013) Usefulness of atrial deformation analysis to predict left atrial fibrosis and endocardial thickness in patients undergoing mitral valve operations for severe mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 111(4):595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Antonini-Canterin F, Beladan CC, Popescu BA et al (2008) Left atrial remodelling early after mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. Heart 94:759–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2006) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 35:363–369

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schabelman S, Schiller NB, Silverman NH et al (1981) Left atrial volume estimation by two-dimensional echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 7:165–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schiller NB, Botvinick EH (1986) Noninvasive quantitation of the left heart by echocardiography and scintigraphy. Cardiovasc Clin 17:45–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pepi M, Tamborini G, Galli C et al (1994) A new formula for Echo–Doppler estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braunwald E, Awe WC (1963) The syndrome of severe mitral regurgitation with normal left atrial pressure. Circulation 27:29–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kernis SJ, Nkomo VT, Messika-Zeitoun D et al (2004) Atrial fibrillation after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in sinus rhythm: incidence, outcome, and determinants. Circulation 110:2320–2325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tourneau TL, Messika-Zeitoun D, Russo A et al (2010) Impact of left atrial volume on clinical outcome in organic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:570–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Messika-Zeitoun D, Bellamy M, Avierinos JF et al (2007) Left atrial remodelling in mitral regurgitation-methodologic approach, physiological determinants, and outcome implications: a prospective quantitative Doppler-echocardiographic and electron beam-computed tomographic study. Eur Heart J 28(14):1773–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bitigen A, Bulut M, Tanalp AC, Kirma C, Barutçu I, Pala S, Erkol A, Boztosun B (2007) Left atrial appendage functions in patients with severe rheumatic mitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23(6):693–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bitigen A, Türkmen M, Karakaya O, Saglam M, Barutcu I, Esen AM, Türkyilmaz E, Erkol A, Bulut M, Boztosun B, Kirma C (2006) Early effects of percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty on left atrial mechanical functions. Tohoku J Exp Med 209:285–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tops LF, Delgado V, Bertini M et al (2011) Left atrial strain predicts reverse remodeling after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(3):324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KH, Kim YJ, Shin DH et al (2010) Left atrial remodelling in patients with successful percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: determinants and impact on long-term clinical outcome. Heart 96(13):1050–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cho DK, Ha JW, Chang BC et al (2008) Factors determining early left atrial reverse remodeling after mitral valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 101(3):374–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marsan NA, Maffessanti F, Tamborini G et al (2011) Left atrial reverse remodeling and functional improvement after mitral valve repair in degenerative mitral regurgitation: a real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography study. Am Heart J 161(2):314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Song BG, On YK, Jeon ES et al (2010) Atrioventricular reverse remodeling after valve repair for chronic severe mitral regurgitation: 1-year follow-up. Clin Cardiol 33(10):630–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hyllén S, Nozohoor S, Meurling C et al (2013) Determinants of left atrial reverse remodeling after valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 22(1):2–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Borg AN, Harrison JL, Argyle RA, Pearce KA, Beynon R, Ray SG (2010) Left ventricular filling and diastolic myocardial deformation in chronic primary mitral regurgitation. Eur J Echocardiogr 11:523–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossi A, Cicoira M, Golia G, Anselmi M, Zardini P (2001) Mitral regurgitation and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction similarly affect mitral and pulmonary vein flow Doppler parameters: the advantage of end-diastolic markers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14:562–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohte N, Narita H, Akita S, Kurokawa K, Hayano J, Kimura G (2002) Striking effect of left ventricular high filling pressure with mitral regurgitation on mitral annular velocity during early diastole. A study using colour M-mode tissue Doppler imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr 3:52–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Diwan A, McCulloch M, Lawrie GM, Reardon MJ, Nagueh SF (2005) Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with mitral valve disease. Circulation 111:3281–3289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS et al (2010) Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(3):231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cameli M, Lisi M, Giacomin E et al (2011) Chronic mitral regurgitation: left atrial deformation analysis by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography 28(3):327–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozkan Candan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Candan, O., Ozdemir, N., Aung, S.M. et al. Atrial longitudinal strain parameters predict left atrial reverse remodeling after mitral valve surgery: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1049–1056 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0433-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0433-9

Keywords

Navigation