Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22–32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha−1 and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha−1 year−1 (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha−1 and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha−1 year−1 at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akala VA, Lal R (2000) Potential of mine land reclamation for soil organic carbon sequestration in Ohio. Land Degrad Dev 11:289–297. doi:10.1002/1099-145X(200005/06)11:3<289::AID-LDR385>3.0.CO;2-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison FE (1973) Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM et al (2004) Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Front Ecol Environ 2:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt H, Six J, Hendrix PF (2005) Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biol Biochem 37:251–258. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw A (1993) The reconstruction of ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 20:1–17. doi:10.2307/2403372

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soil. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannel MGR, Dewar RC (1995) The carbon sink provided by plantation forests and their production in Britain. Forestry 68:35–48. doi:10.1093/forestry/68.1.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chroust L (1985) Above-ground biomass of young pine forests (Pinus sylvestris) and its determination. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Czechosloveniae 14:127–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J (2002) The effect of soil macrofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter accumulation during soil formation in spoil heaps after brown coal mining: a preliminary result. Ekologia (Bratisl) 21:363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Kalčík J (2006) Accumulation of soil organic carbon in relation to other soil characteristic during spontaneous succession in non-reclaimed colliery spoil heaps after brown coal mining near Sokolov (The Czech Republic). Ekologia (Bratisl) 25:388–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Keplin B, Pižl V et al (2001) Soil biota and upper soil layers development in two contrasting post-mining chronosequences. Ecol Eng 17:275–284. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00144-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Elhottová D, Kuráž V, Šourková M (2006) Effect of soil macrofauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post mining sites: result of field microcosm experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 33:308–320. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Elhottová D, Pižl V et al (2007a) The effect of litter quality and soil faunal composition on organic matter dynamics in post-mining soil: a laboratory study. Appl Soil Ecol 37:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Pižl V, Tajovský K (2007b) The effect of earthworms and other saprophagous macrofauna on soil microstructure in reclaimed and un-reclaimed post-mining sites in Central Europe. Eur J Soil Biol 43:184–189. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Prach K, Pižl V et al (2008) Interactions between soil development, vegetation and soil fauna during spontaneous succession in post mining sites. Eur J Soil Biol 44:109–121. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garten CT (2002) Soil carbon storage beneath recently established tree plantations in Tennessee and South Carolina, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 23:93–102. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00033-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenberger G, Thomas RJ, Zech W (1996) Soil organic matter within earthworm casts of an anecic-endogeic tropical pasture community, Colombia. Appl Soil Ecol 3:263–274. doi:10.1016/0929-1393(95)00081-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochbichler E (2002) Vorläufige Ergebnisse von Biomasseninventuren in Buchen- und Mittelwaldbeständen. In: Dietrich HP, Raspe S, Preushsler T (eds) Inventur von Biomasse- und Nährstoffvorräten in Waldbeständen. Forstliche Forschungsberichte. LWF, München, pp 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Insam H, Domsch KH (1988) Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on chronosequences of reclamation sites. Microb Ecol 15:177–188. doi:10.1007/BF02011711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2003) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Good Practice Guidance for Land Use. Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmer U (1995) Die Stellung der Bodenfauna im Stoffhaushat schleswig-holstein Walder. Faunistische Oekologische Mitt 18:1–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall. Inc, Engewood Clifs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia S, Akiyama T (2005) A precise, unified method for estimating carbon storage in cool-temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Agric Meteorol 134:70–80. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson T (1999) Biomass equations for determining fractions of European aspen growing on abandoned farmland and some practical implications. Biomass Bioenergy 17:471–480. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00073-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson T (2000) Biomass equations for determining fractions of common and grey alders growing on abandoned farmland and some practical implications. Biomass Bioenergy 18:147–159. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempson D, Lloyd M, Ghelardi R (1963) A new extractor for woodland litter. Pedobiologia (Jena) 3:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ker MF (1980) Tree biomass equations for ten major species in Cumberland County, Nova Scotia. Can For Serv Marit For Res Cent Inf Rep M-X 148:54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooistra MJ (1991) A micromorphological approach to the interactions between soil structure and soil biota. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:315–328. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(91)90117-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kříbek B, Strnad M, Boháček Z et al (1998) Geochemistry of Miocene lacustrine sediments from the Sokolov Coal Basin (Czech Republic). Int J Coal Geol 37:207–233. doi:10.1016/S0166-5162(98)00002-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladegaard-Pedersen P, Elberling B, Vesterdal L (2005) Soil carbon stocks, mineralization rates, and CO2 effluxes under 10 tree species on contrasting soil types. Can J For Res 35:1277–1284. doi:10.1139/x05-045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Martin A (1992) Small-scale and large-scale effect of endogeic earthworms on soil organic matter dynamics in soil of humid tropics. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1491–1498. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(92)90138-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Bignell D, Lepage M (1997) Soil function in changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur J Soil Biol 33:159–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Marklund LG (1988) Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet. Rapporter-Skog 45:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney M, Bolger T (2000) Decomposition of Quercus petraea litter: influence of burial, comminution and earthworms. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1989–2000. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00097-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metting FB, Smith JL, Amthor JS et al (2001) Science needs a new technology for increasing soil carbon sequestration. Clim Change 51:11–34. doi:10.1023/A:1017509224801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis M, Redmond J, O’Donovan C (eds) (2007) National Forest Inventory—Republic of Ireland-Methodology. Forest Service, Dept. Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Ireland, ISBN 0-7557-7562-7, pp. 124

  • Niu XZ, Duiker SW (2006) Carbon sequestration potential by afforestation of marginal agricultural land in the Midwestern US. For Ecol Manage 223:415–427. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan N, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257. doi:10.1007/s10457-005-0361-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pižl V (2001) Earthworm succession in afforested colliery spoil heaps in the Sokolov region, Czech Republic. Restor Ecol 9:359–364. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.94004.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF (2003) Humus form in terrestrial ecosystem: a framework to biodiversity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:935–945. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00149-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer WM, Nielsen GA, Dollhopf DJ et al (1979) Soil genesis, hydrological properties, root characteristics and microbial activity of 1 to 50-year old stripmine spoils. EPA-600/7–79-100. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Scullion J, Malik A (2000) Earthworm activity affecting organic matter aggregation and microbial activity in soils restored after opencast mining for coal. Soil Biol Biochem 32:119–126. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00142-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Conanat RT, Paul EP et al (2002) Stabilisation mechanism of soil organic mater: implicatin for C saturation of soil. Plant Soil 241:155–176. doi:10.1023/A:1016125726789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skukla MK, Lal R (2005) Temporal changes in soil organic carbon concentration and stocks in reclaimed minesoils of southeastern Ohio. Soil Sci 170:1013–1021. doi:10.1097/01.ss.0000187354.62481.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šourková M, Frouz J, Šantrůčková H (2005) Accumulation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus during soil formation on alder spoil heaps after brown-coal mining, near Sokolov (Czech Republic). Geoderma 124:203–214. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP, Wheeler D, Esely ET et al (2006) What is soil organic matter worth? J Environ Qual 35:548–557. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart VI, Scullion J (1988) Earthworm, soil structure and the rehabilitation of former opencast coal mining land. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. Academic Publishing, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart VI, Scullion J (1989) Principles of managing man-made soils. Soil Use Manage 5:109–116. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00770.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD (1997) Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manage 97:1–24. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00019-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ussiri DAN, Lal R, Jacinthe PA (2006) Post-reclamation land use effects on properties and carbon sequestration in minesoils of southeastern Ohio. Soil Sci 171:261–271. doi:10.1097/01.ss.0000199702.68654.1e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utkin AI, Zamolodchikov DG, Gul’be TA et al (1996) Allometric equations for phytomass based on the data on pine, birch and aspen trees in European Russia. Lesovedenie 6:36–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachendorf C, Irmler U, Blume HP (1997) Relationships between litter fauna and chemical changes of litter during decomposition under different moisture conditions. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by Nature: Plant litter quality and decomposition. Walingford

  • Walle VI, Mussche S, Samson R, Lust N, Lemeur R (2001) The above- and belowground carbon pools of two mixed deciduous forest stands located in East-Flanders (Belgium). Ann For Sci 58:507–517. doi:10.1051/forest:2001141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wironen M, Moore TR (2006) Exotic earthworm invasion increases soil carbon and nitrogen in an old-growth forest in southern Quebec. Can J For Res 36:845–854. doi:10.1139/X06-016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth C, Schumacher J, Schulze ED (2004) Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a-meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiol 24:121–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters V (2000) Invertebrate control of soil organic matter stability. Biol Fertil Soils 31:1–19. doi:10.1007/s003740050618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XD, Ang J, Xie HT et al (2003) Comparison of organic compounds in the particle-size fractions of earthworm casts and surrounding soil in humid Laos. Appl Soil Ecol 23:147–153. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao-gang L, Feng-ri L (2003) The generalized Chapman-Richards function and applications to tree and stand growth. J For Res 14:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou X, Bashkin M (1998) Soil carbon accretion and earthworm recovery following revegetation in abandoned sugarcane fields. Soil Biol Biochem 30:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grant no 2B8023, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (grant No. S600660505) and by Sokolovska uhelna a.s. coal mining company. We also thank the Sokolovska uhelna for the research permit and technical information about the plot history. Our thanks go to Mr. Josef Jerhot and Ms. Jitka Weydova for the field assistance and preparation of thin soil sections. Dr. Pat Noris is thanked for language improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

    Jan Frouz, Václav Pižl & Jiří Kalčík

  2. IFER-Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research, Ltd, Areál 1 Jílovské a.s. 1544, 25401, Jílové u Prahy, Czech Republic

    Emil Cienciala

  3. Institute for Environmnetal Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benatska 2, 12801, Prague 2, Czech Republic

    Jan Frouz

Authors
  1. Jan Frouz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Václav Pižl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emil Cienciala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiří Kalčík
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Frouz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frouz, J., Pižl, V., Cienciala, E. et al. Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation. Biogeochemistry 94, 111–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation