Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ilizarov external fixation or locked intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal tibial fractures: a randomized, prospective study of 58 consecutive patients

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the Ilizarov circular fixator (IL) and locked intramedullary nailing (IM).

Patients and methods

Patients with isolated tibia shaft fractures were randomly allocated to either the IL (n = 31) or IM (n = 27) method. Conventional radiographs, postoperative pain assessment, self-appraisal scores and complications were evaluated. At the clinical 1-year follow-up, the patients were also evaluated by an independent observer.

Results

The minority of patients had open fractures, two and nine patients in the IM and IL groups, respectively. Eight patients in the IM group and four in the IL group sustained major complications (p = 0.107). In the IM group, two patients developed compartment syndrome, one deep infection, one hardware failure, one delayed union, one pseudarthrosis and two had a malunion. In the IL group, two patients developed pseudarthrosis and two had a malunion. Superficial pin-site infections were observed in 16 patients in the IL group. The fractures had healed radiographically at 12 weeks in both groups. At the 1-year follow-up, there were differences in pain (VAS) and satisfaction (VAS) scores in favor of IL treatment (VAS, p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). There were no differences between the groups with regard to range of motion (ROM) in the knee and ankle joints. The registration of local tenderness and pain revealed that there were 19 patients with anterior knee pain in the IM group and one in the IL group at the 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The IL is a safe and reliable alternative to IM for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures, with a low complication rate and good clinical outcome. Both treatments were well tolerated, but at the 1-year follow-up the patients in the IM group had more pain and were less satisfied. Finally, there was a high frequency of anterior knee pain in the IM group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 16(8):562–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Tornetta P 3rd et al (2002) Current practice in the intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: an international survey. J trauma 53(4):725–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S et al (2003) Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 17(5):353–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Burgess AR, Ebraheim NA (1986) Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 68(9):1348–1353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boerger TO, Patel G, Murphy JP (1999) Is routine removal of intramedullary nails justified. Injury 30(2):79–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boutron I, Tubach F, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P (2004) Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. J Clin Epidemiol 57(6):543–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Braten M, Helland P, Grontvedt T, Aamodt A, Benum P, Molster A (2005) External fixation versus locked intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft fractures: a prospective, randomised study of 78 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(1):21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Busse JW, Morton E, Lacchetti C, Guyatt GH, Bhandari M (2008) Current management of tibial shaft fractures: a survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. Acta orthopaedica 79(5):689–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cannada LK, Anglen JO, Archdeacon MT, Herscovici D, Ostrum RF (2008) Avoiding complications in the care of fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 90(8):1760–1768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cartwright-Terry M, Snow M, Nalwad H (2007) The severity and prediction of anterior knee pain post tibial nail insertion. J Orthop Trauma 21(6):381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Catagni MA, Ottaviani G, Combi A, Elhence A (2006) External circular fixation: a comparison of infection rates between wires and conical half-pins with threads outside or inside the skin. J Trauma 61(5):1186–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Checketts R, Otterburn M, Mac Eachern A (2003) Pin track infection; definition, incidence and prevention. Int J Orthop Trauma 3(3):16–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coles CP, Gross M (2000) Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature. Can J Surg 43(4):256–262

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T, 3rd (2008) Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg 90(9):1862–1868

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Court-Brown CM (2004) Reamed intramedullary tibial nailing: an overview and analysis of 1106 cases. J Trauma 18:96–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davies R, Holt N, Nayagam S (2005) The care of pin sites with external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 87(5):716–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis BJ, Roberts PJ, Moorcroft CI, Brown MF, Thomas PB, Wade RH (2004) Reliability of radiographs in defining union of internally fixed fractures. Injury 35(6):557–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi Brivio L (1984) The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. J Bone Joint Surg 66(4):538–545

    Google Scholar 

  20. Emami A, Mjoberg B, Karlstrom G, Larsson S (1995) Treatment of closed tibial shaft fractures with unilateral external fixation. Injury 26(5):299–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming B, Paley D, Kristiansen T, Pope M (1989) A biomechanical analysis of the Ilizarov external fixator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:95–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Foster PA, Barton SB, Jones SC, Morrison RJ, Britten S (2012) The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method. J Bone Joint Surg 94(12):1678–1683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gershuni DH, Mubarak SJ, Yaru NC, Lee YF (1987) Fracture of the tibia complicated by acute compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 217:221–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. The Journal of bone and joint surgery 58(4):453–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN (1984) Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 24(8):742–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hammer RR, Hammerby S, Lindholm B (1985) Accuracy of radiologic assessment of tibial shaft fracture union in humans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 199:233–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris I, Lyons M (2005) Reoperation rate in diaphyseal tibia fractures. ANZ J Surg 75(12):1041–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henley MB, Chapman JR, Agel J, Harvey EJ, Whorton AM, Swiontkowski MF (1998) Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. J Orthop Trauma 12(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hooper GJ, Keddell RG, Penny ID (1991) Conservative management or closed nailing for tibial shaft fractures. A randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg 73(1):83–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hunt SM, McEwen J (1980) The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn 2(3):231–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ilizarov G (1954) A new principle of osteosynthesis using crossing wires and rings. In: Ilizarov GA (ed) Collected Scientific Works of the Kurgan Regional Scientific Medical Society. Union of Soviet Socialits Republic, Kurgan

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ilizarov GA (1992) Transosseous osteosynthesis, 1st edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin

  33. Joslin CC, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Hardy JR, Cunningham JL (2008) Weight bearing after tibial fracture as a guide to healing. Clin Biomech 23(3):329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Karladani AH, Granhed H, Edshage B, Jerre R, Styf J (2000) Displaced tibial shaft fractures: a prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71(2):160–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Karladani AH, Granhed H, Karrholm J, Styf J (2001) The influence of fracture etiology and type on fracture healing: a review of 104 consecutive tibial shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(6):325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Keating JF, Gardner E, Leach WJ, Macpherson S, Abrami G (1991) Management of tibial fractures with the orthofix dynamic external fixator. J R Coll Surg Edinb 36(4):272–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kettelkamp DB, Hillberry BM, DE Murrish, Heck DA (1988) Degenerative arthritis of the knee secondary to fracture malunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 234:159–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Khatod M, Botte MJ, Hoyt DB, Meyer RS, Smith JM, Akeson WH (2003) Outcomes in open tibia fractures: relationship between delay in treatment and infection. J Trauma 55(5):949–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kristensen KD, Kiaer T, Blicher J (1989) No arthrosis of the ankle 20 years after malaligned tibial-shaft fracture. Acta Orthop Scand 60(2):208–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Chan H, Blachut PA (2008) Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 22(8):525–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Malik MH, Harwood P, Diggle P, Khan SA (2004) Factors affecting rates of infection and nonunion in intramedullary nailing. The Journal of bone and joint surgery 86(4):556–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Milner SA, Davis TR, Muir KR, Greenwood DC, Doherty M (2002) Long-term outcome after tibial shaft fracture: is malunion important? J Bone Joint Surg 84-A(6):971–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Müller M (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones (eds). Springer Verlag, New York

  44. Onnerfalt R (1978) Fracture of the tibial shaft treated by primary operation and early weight-bearing. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 171:1–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sahtarker H, Gillson SC, Stolero J, Kaushansky A, Volpin G (2002) Ilizarov external fixator as an alternative treatment for tibial shaft fractures in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B(Supp III):305

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sarmiento A, Burkhalter WE, Latta LL (2003) Functional bracing in the treatment of delayed union and nonunion of the tibia. Int Orthop 27(1):26–29

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwartsman V, Martin SN, Ronquist RA, Schwartsman R (1992) Tibial fractures. The Ilizarov alternative. Clin Orthop Relat Res 278:207–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharrard WJ (1990) A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 72(3):347–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Solomin L (2008) The basic principles of external fixation using the Ilizarov device (eds). Springer Verlag, Milan, Berlin, Heidelberger, New York

  50. Strecker W, Suger G, Kinzl L (1996) Local complications of intramedullary nailing. Der Orthopade 25(3):274–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Taylor J (1991) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics (eds), 7th Mosby, pp 786–893

  52. Toivanen JA, Hirvonen M, Auvinen O et al (2000) Cast treatment and intramedullary locking nailing for simple and spiral wedge tibial shaft fractures—a cost benefit analysis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89(2):138–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an eight-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Trauma 64(6):1511–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Paakkala T, Jarvela T, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2005) Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: an ultrasound study of the patellar tendons of 36 patients. J Orthop Trauma 19(5):311–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD (2002) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 84(1):15–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiklund I, Romanus B, Hunt SM (1988) Self-assessed disability in patients with arthrosis of the hip joint. Reliability of the Swedish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int Disabil Stud 10(4):159–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Salmir Nasic, for help with the statistical analysis of the data. MalgorzataSoja, consultant for help with the radiological assessment. The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants directly related to the research presented in this manuscript. The first author received funding from the Research Fund at Skaraborg Hospital and from the Institute of Research and Development, Sweden to support this research. The authors state that this manuscript is an original work only submitted to this journal. All authors contributed to the preparation of this work.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Skaraborg Hospital Skövde, 54185, Skövde, Sweden

    Telmo Ramos & Lars Nistor

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden

    Bengt I. Eriksson & Jón Karlsson

Authors
  1. Telmo Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bengt I. Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jón Karlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars Nistor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Telmo Ramos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramos, T., Eriksson, B.I., Karlsson, J. et al. Ilizarov external fixation or locked intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal tibial fractures: a randomized, prospective study of 58 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 793–802 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1970-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1970-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation