Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic evaluation with autosomal and X-chromosomal inheritance

  • Originals
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

At present, genetic evaluation in livestock using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) assumes autosomal inheritance. There is evidence, however, of X-chromosomal inheritance for some traits of economic importance. BLUP can accommodate models that include X-chromosomal in addition to autosomal inheritance. To obtain BLUP with autosomal and X-chromosomal additive inheritance for a population in which allelic frequency is equal in the sexes, and that is in gametic equilibrium, we write y i = x′iβ + ai + si + ei, where y i is the phenotypic value for individual i, x′i, is a vector of constants relating y i to fixed effects, β is a vector of fixed effects, a i is the additive genetic effect for autosomal loci, S i is the additive genetic effect for X-chromosomal loci, and e i is random error. The covariance matrix of a i's is 2A , where A is the matrix of twice the co-ancestries between relatives for autosomal loci, and σ 2A is the variance of additive genetic effects for autosomal loci. The covariance matrix of s i's is 2F , where S is a matrix of functions of co-ancestries between relatives for X-chromosomal loci and σ 2F is the variance of additive genetic effects for X-chromosomal loci for noninbred females. Given the covariance matrices of random effects a i, si, and e i, BLUPs of autosomal and of X-chromosomal additive effects can be obtained using mixed model equations. Recursive rules to construct S and an efficient algorithm to compute its inverse are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benyshek LL, Johnson MH, Little DE, Bertrand JK, Kriese LA (1988) Application of an animal model in the United States beef cattle industry. J Dairy Sci 71 [Suppl 2]:35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley DE, Atchley WR, Rutledge JJ (1986) Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melangaster. I. Sexual dimorphism in genetic parameters for wing traits. Genetics 114:549–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando RL, Gianola D (1990) Statistical inferences in populations undergoing selection or non-random mating. In: Gianola D, Hammond K (eds), Advances in statistical methods for genetic improvement of livestock. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Eisen EJ (1989) Inbreeding, coancestry, and co-variance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci. J Hered 80:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Fernando RL (1989) Covariance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci in a population in disequilibrium. Theor Appl Genet 77:311–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1953) Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics 9:226–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1973) Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In: Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. Am Soc Anim Sci and Am Dairy Sci Assn, Champaign/IL, pp 10–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1976) A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Im S, Fernando RL, Gianola D (1989) Likelihood inferences in animal breeding under selection: a missing data theory view point. Genet Sel Evol 21:399–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerome FN, Henderson CR, King SC (1956) Heritabilities, gene interactions, and correlations associated with certain traits in the domestic fowl. Poultry Sci 35:995–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan M (1988) Textbook of human genetics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 158–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Lush JL (1945) Animal breeding plans, 3rd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames/IA, pp 352–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaas RL, Anderson RD, Gilmour AR (1984) BLUP school handbook: Use of mixed models for prediction and for estimation of (co)variance components. University of New England, Australia, pp 1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JAB, Chesnais JP (1988) Application of the animal model on a national basis to the evaluation of Canadian livestock. J Dairy Sci 71 [Suppl 2]:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer LR, Kennedy BW, Gibson JP (1989) The inverse of the gametic relationship matrix. J Dairy Sci 72:1266–1272

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CH, Blow WL, Cockerham CC, Glazener EW (1958) The heritability of body weight, gain, feed consumption, and feed efficiency in broilers. Poultry Sci 37:862–869

    Google Scholar 

  • VanRaden PM (1987) Evaluations of sires based on sons and on maternal grandsons. J Dairy Sci 70 [Suppl 1]:185

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggans GR, Misztal I, Van Vleck LD (1988) Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci 71 [Suppl 2]:54–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1933) Inbreeding and homozygosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 19:411–420

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by E. I Eisen

Dedicated to the memory of Dr. C. R. Henderson, whose encouraging comments stimulated the research in this paper. Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch Project 35-0367, Estimation of Genetic Parameters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernando, R.L., Grossman, M. Genetic evaluation with autosomal and X-chromosomal inheritance. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 80, 75–80 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224018

Key words

Navigation