Abstract
In this paper, we describe a methodological alternative to the point-light display for the study of the impact of human movement on social perception. This quantization technique involves degrading standard videotapes via a special effects generator at the time of editing. As is the case with a point-light display, quantization disguises structural characteristics of videotaped stimulus persons, and highlights their patterns of movement. Because quantization requires no special procedures during videotaping, it is unobtrusive, and helps maintain the ecological validity of the original stimulus. We offer empirical support from two studies for our proposal that dynamic quantization is a valuable methodological approach to the study of nonverbal behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassili, J.N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4 373–379.
Bassili, J.N. (1979). Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of the upper and lower areas of the face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 2049–2058.
Bernieri, F.J., Davis, J.M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. (1991).Interactional synchrony and the social affordance of rapport: A validation study. Unpublished manuscript.
Berry, D.S. (1989).The development of sensitivity to information in facial events. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Event Perception and Action, Oxford, OH.
Berry, D.S. (1990a).Social kinematics: An event perception view of social action and interaction. Paper presented at the Nag's Head Conference on Interaction and Close Relationships, Nags Head, NC.
Berry, D.S. (1990b). What can a moving face tell us?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 1004–1014.
Berry, D.S., Misovich, S.J., Kean, K.J., & Baron, R.M. (in press). Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Cutting, J.E. & Proffitt, D.E. (1981). Gait perception as an example of how we may perceive events. In R.D. Walk & H.L. Pick (Eds.),Intersensory perception and sensory integration (pp. 249–273). New York: Plenum.
Good, J.M.M. (1987).Perception, action and interaction: An ecological social psychology of social knowing. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Event Perception and Action, Trieste, Italy.
Harmon, L.D. (1973). The recognition of faces.Scientific American, 229 71–82.
Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior.American Journal of Psychology, 243–259.
Ickes, W., Robertson, E., Tooke, W., & Teng, G. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment and validation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 66–82.
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 14 201–211.
Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception.Psychological Research, 38 379–393.
Kassin, S.M. (1982). Heider and Simmel (1944) revisited: Casual attribution and the animated film technique. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Kozlowski, L.T. & Cutting, J.E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display.Perception & Psychophysics, 21 575–580.
McArthur, L.Z., & Baron, R.M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception.Psychological Review, 90 215–238.
Misovich, S.J., Kean, K.J., & Baron, R.M. (1991).synchrony, affect and relationship detection in quantized and non-quantized feeding interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
Montepare, J.M. & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1988). Impressions of people created by age-related qualities of their gaits.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 547–556.
Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C., & Ross, J. (1983). Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images.Nature, 305 (15 September), 226–228.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M.H. (1985).Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: R.D. Irwin.
Runeson, S. & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7 733–744.
Runeson, S. & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition and deceptive intention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112 580–610.
Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1986). Kinematic specification of gender and gender expression. In V. McCabe and G. Balzano (Eds.),Event cognition: An ecological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Soken, N., Smith, L., Bakic, C. & Pick, A. (1989).Intermodal perception of fully illuminated and point-light displays of dynamic facial expressions by 7-month-old infants. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of these data were presented at the Nags Head Conference on Interaction and Close Relationships, Nags Head, NC, May, 1990; and at the Perceiving and Acting Workshop, The Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action, University of Connecticut, August, 1990. This research was supported by a Sabbatical Research Support Grant from Southern Methodist University, and NIMH Grant # 1-R03-MH43850-01, awarded to Diane S. Berry; and NSF Grant #BNS-8719065 awarded to Reuben M. Baron. We are grateful to Frank Bernieri and the reviewers for their helpful comments regarding this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berry, D.S., Kean, K.J., Misovich, S.J. et al. Quantized displays of human movement: A methodological alternative to the point-light display. J Nonverbal Behav 15, 81–97 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998264
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998264