Abstract
Earlier discussions on the biogeography of India generally seem to consider the distribution of plants and animals, the floristic and faunistic affinities and compositions and other biogeographical characters as largely static features and also unrelated to the profound and continual changes in the location, size, configuration, topography and drainage patterns of the region. This has unfortunately resulted in considerable confusion and led to untenable conclusions and curious contradictions. The distribution of plants and animals is, however, a dynamic phenomena and embraces the whole history of movements of the flora and fauna, including both gain and loss of the entire biogeographical area. This area is continually undergoing slow but complex changes, increasing in size in some parts, decreasing in size in others, shifting as a whole and coming into contact with other areas or becoming separated from them, breaking up into smaller and isolated patches or also coalescing into larger and more complex units. The present-day biogeographical characters have been derived as a result of gradual and continuous modification of past ones, which in their turn were modifications of still earlier characters. The composition, ecological characters, affinities of the flora and fauna and the distributional patterns of the plants and animals are, therefore, continually changing; we refer to these changes as biogeographical evolution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AUDEN, J. B. 1949. A geological discussion of the Satpura hypothesis and Garo-Rajmahal Gap. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 315–340.
BISWAS, K. & M. A. Sampatkumaran, 1949. Botanical notes on the Satpura theory. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 365–357.
BLANFORD, W. T. 1901. The distribution of Vertebrate animals in India, Ceylon and Burma. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, (B) 194: 335–436.
DEY,A. K. 1949. The age of the Bengal Gap. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 409–410.
DILGER, W. G. 1952. The Brij hypothesis as an explanation for the tropical faunal similarities between the Western Ghats and the Eastern Himalaya, Assam, Burma and Malaya. Evolution, 6: 125–127.
ELWES, H. J. 1873. On the geographical distribution of Asiatic birds. Proc. zool. Soc. London, pp. 645–682.
GROSS, F. J. 1960. Zur Geschichte und Verbreitung der euroasiatischen Satyriden (Lepidoptera). Verh. deutsch, zool. Ges. Bonn Rhein., 513–528.
GROSS, F. J. 1961. Zur Evolution euroasiatischer Lepidopteren. Verh. deutsch, zool.Ges. Saarbrücken, 461–478.
HORA, S. L. 1944. On the Malayan affinities of the freshwater fish fauna of Peninsular India and its bearing on the probable age of the Garo-Rajmahal Gap. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 10: 243–439.
HORA, S. L. 1948. The distribution of crocodiles and chelonians in Ceylon, India, Burma and farther east. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 14: 285–310.
HORA, S. L. 1949. Symposium on the Satpura hypothesis of the distribution of the Malayan fauna and flora to Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 309 - 314.
HORA, S. L. 1949. Climate as affecting the Satpura hypothesis. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 361–364.
HORA, S. L. 1949. Remarks on the distribution of snakes of Peninsular India with Malayan affinities. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 399–403.
HORA, S. L. 1949. Discontinuous distribution of certain fishes of the Far East to Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 411–416.
HORA, S. L. 1949. Zoogeographical observations on the fauna of Pareshnath Hill. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 421–422.
HORA, S. L. 1950. Hora’s Satpura hypothesis. Curr. Sci., 19: 364–370.
HORA, S. L. 1951. Some observations on the Palaeogeography of the Garo-Rajmahal Gap as evidenced by the distribution of Malayan fauna and flora to Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 17: 437–444.
ILLIES, J. 1965. Die wegnersche Kontinentalverschiebungstheorie im Lichte der moderne Biogeographie. Die Naturwissenschaften, 52(18): 505–511, fig. 5.
JACOB, K. 1949. Land connections between Ceylon and Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 341–343.
JAYARAM, K. C. 1949. A note on the distribution of chelonians of Peninsular India with Malayan affinities. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 397–398.
JAYARAM, K. C. 1949. Distribution of lizards of Peninsular India with Malayan affinities. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 403–408.
JAYARAM, K. C. 1949. Remarks on the distribution of Annelids (earthworms and leeches) of Peninsular India with Malayan affinities. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 417–420.
KHAJURIA, H. 1924. Mammalian fauna of the semi-arid tracts of Deccan and its bearing on the appearance of aridity in the region. Sci. Cult., 21: 293–295.
KURUP, G. U. 1966. Mammals of Assam and adjoining areas. 1. Analytical study, Proc. zool. Soc. Calcutta, 19: 1–21.
LATTIN, G. DE, 1951. Über die zoogeographischen Verhältnisse Vorderasiens. Verh. deutsch, zool. Ges., 1950, Marburg (Zool. Anz.) (Suppl.).
LATTIN, G. DE, 1966. Grundrisse der Zoogeographie. Jena: Gustav Fisher, pp. 460, figs. 170.
MAHENDRA, B. G. 1939. The zoogeography of India in the light of herpetological studies. Sci. Cult., 4 (7): 1–11.
MANI, M. S. 1968. Ecology and Biogeography of High Altitude Insects. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers pp. 527.
MANI, M. S. 1968. Zoogeography of the mountains of India. Mountains & Rivers: 21 Internat, geogr. Gongr. India, pp. 96–109.
MEDLICOTT, H. B. & W. T. Blanford, 1879. Faunal of Geology of India, pp. lxx, 374–375.
MENON, A. G. K. 1951. Further Studies regarding HORA’S Satpura hypothesis. 1. The role of the Eastern Ghats in the distribution of the Malayan fauna and flora to Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 17: 475–497.
MICHELSEN, W. 1922. Die Verbreitung der Oligochäten im Lichte der Wegenersche Theorie der Kontinentalverschiebung und andere Fragen zur Stammesgeschichte und Verbreitung dieser Tiergruppe. Verh. naturw. Ver. Hamburg, (3) xxix.
PRASHAD, B. 1941. The Indo-Brahm or the Siwalik river. Ree. geol. Surv. India, 74 (4): 555–561.
ROONWAL, M. L. & Bhola Nath, 1949. Discontinuous distribution of certain Indo-Malayan mammals and its zoogeographical significance. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 15 (B): 365–377.
SARASSIN, F. 1910. Über die Geschichte der Tierwelt Ceylon. Jahrb., (12): 1–160.
SILAS, E. G. 1952. Further studies regarding HORA’S Satpura hypothesis. Taxonomic assessment and level of evolutionary divergence of fishes with the socalled Malayan affinities in Peninsular India. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, 18(B) (5): 423–448.
STEPHENSON, J. 1921. Contributions to the morphology, classification and zoogeography of Indian Oligochaeta. 1. Affinities and systematic position of the genus Eudichogaster Michs. and some related questions. 2. On polyphyly in the Oligochaeta. 3. Some general considerations on the geographical distribution of Indian Oligochaeta. Proc. zool. Soc. London.
STEPHENSON, J. 1923. Oligochaeta. Fauna Brit. India, pp. 1–518.
WALLACE, A. R. 1876. Geographical Distribution of Animals. London, 2 vols.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Dr. W. Junk b.v., Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mani, M.S. (1974). Biogeographical Evolution in India. In: Mani, M.S. (eds) Ecology and Biogeography in India. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2331-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2331-3_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2333-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2331-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive