Abstract
Digital learning formats using Augmented Reality (AR) technologies have already been successfully used in industry. AR opens new possibilities to guide employees systematically through assembly processes, ensuring the practical relevance of the learning content and a saving of time in the learning process. In order to enhance this technology’s acceptance, user-centred designed AR applications are crucial. This paper aims at deriving conclusions on the usability of AR Head Mounted Displays (HMD) in the field of production. As the transferability of lab-based usability studies is still lacking, we conducted a mixed method approach in a laboratory as well as a field setting. This paper presents the current state of the art, the development of the AR applications and the main results of the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahrens, D., Spöttl, G.: Die Vision Industrie 4.0 und ihre sozialen Herausforderungen: Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit. In: Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Ittermann, P., Niehaus, J. (eds.) p. 184. Nomos, Baden-Baden (2015)
Schuh, G., Gartzen, T., Rodenhauser, T., Marks, A.: Promoting work-based learning through industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 32, 82–87 (2015)
Guo, Q.: Learning in a mixed reality system in the context of industry 4.0. J. Tech. Educ. 3, 92–115 (2015)
Funk, M., Kosch, T., Schmidt, A.: Interactive worker assistance. In: Lukowicz, P., Krüger, A., Bulling, A., Lim, Y.-K., Patel, S.N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp 2016, pp. 934–939. ACM Press, New York (2016)
Werrlich, S., Austino, D., Ginger, A., Nguyen, P.-A., Notni, G.: Comparing HMD-based and paper-based training. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 134–142. IEEE, Munich (2018)
Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., Mou, W.: Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Cockton, G., Korhonen, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 2003, pp. 73–80 ACM Press, New York (2003)
Dey, A., Billinghurst, M., Lindeman, R.W., Swan, J.E.: A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014. Front. Robot. AI 5, 161 (2018)
Webel, S., Bockholt, U., Engelke, T., Gavish, N., Tecchia, F.: Recent trends of mobile collaborative augmented reality systems. In: Alem, L., Huang, W. (eds.) pp. 69–82. Springer, New York (2011)
Wang, X., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C.: A comprehensive survey of augmented reality assembly research. Adv. Manuf. 1(4), 1–22 (2016)
Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G.: Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 20, 1–11 (2017)
Daling, L., Abdelrazeq, A., Haberstroh, M., Hees, F.: Usability evaluation of augmented reality as instructional tool in collaborative assembly cells. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2019). IARIA (2019, in press)
Tümler, J., Doil, F., Mecke, R., Paul, G., Schenk, M., Pfister, E.A., et al.: Mobile augmented reality in industrial applications: approaches for solution of user-related issues. In: 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 87–90. IEEE, Cambridge (2008)
Nielsen, J.: Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In: Adelson, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 152–158. ACM, New York (1994)
Abdelrazeq, A., Shehadeh, M., Schroeder, S., Richert, A., Jeschke, S.: A development kit for augmented reality applications in healthcare. In: Proceedings of IASTEM International Conference (2017)
Chiu, P.-H., Tseng, P.-H., Feng, K.-T.: Cloud computing based mobile augmented reality interactive system. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 3320–3225. IEEE, Piscataway (2014)
Field, A., Hole, G.: How to Design and Report Experiments. Sage, Los Angeles (2013)
Sarodnick, F., Brau, H.: Methoden der Usability Evaluation: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Huber, Bern (2016)
Beier, G.: Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik. Ein Persönlichkeitsmerkmal mit Relevanz für die Gestaltung technischer Systeme. Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Diss., dissertation.de, Berlin (2003)
Hart, S.G.: Nasa-task load index (NASA-ZLX); 20 years later. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 50, 904–908 (2006)
Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)
Minge, M., Thüring, M., Wagner, I., Kuhr, C.V.: The meCUE questionnaire: a modular tool for measuring user experience. In: Advances in Ergonomics Modeling, Usability and Special Populations, pp. 115–228. Springer, Cham (2017)
Figl, K.: ISONORM 9241/10 und Isometrics: Usability-Fragebögen im Vergleich. In: Wandke, H., Kain, S., Struve, D. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2009: Grenzenlos frei!?, pp. 143–152. Oldenbourg, Munich (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Daling, L., Abdelrazeq, A., Sauerborn, C., Hees, F. (2020). A Comparative Study of Augmented Reality Assistant Tools in Assembly. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 972. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19134-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19135-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)