Abstract
Research on student attitudes and aspirations towards science has been an increasing focus of concern in the past decade. Much of this is driven by a growing concern about students’ lack of interest in the further study of science in advanced societies. Because attitude to science is a multifaceted construct, the chapter first reviews research into attitudes in order to develop principles for its meaningful measurement. We then explore the main features of student responses to science and examine the common assertion that there is a negative downward trend as many have suggested. Recent research clearly shows a negative correlation between a country’s developmental index and student attitudes to science. The effects of gender, teacher quality and pre-adolescent experience on student attitudes and aspirations towards science are examined in some detail, as well as a number of other factors in attempting to understand the complex pathways and choices that students make throughout their schooling about the study of STEM subjects. The construct of identity is used to make sense of the variety of attitudes and aspirations of students towards science, with particular emphasis on gender and youth in post-industrial societies. Finally, the role of enrichment experiences in science is examined, as a real and potential influence on student engagement with science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2008). Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of study: Cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1557–1584.
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188.
Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G., Calabrese, A., & Chinn, P. (2006). FORUM: Toward a politics of place-based science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 403–416.
Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alexander, R. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching. York, UK: Dialogos.
Alloway, N., Dalley, L., Patterson, A., Walker, K., & Lenoy, M. (2004). School students making education and career decisions: Aspirations, attitudes and influences: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Australian Government.
Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., & Halsall, A. (2007). ‘University’s not for me – I’m a Nike person’: Urban, working-class young people’s negotiations of ‘style’, identity and education. Sociology, 41, 219–237.
Assessment of Performance Unit. (1988). Science at age 15: A review of the APU survey findings. London: HMSO.
Au, W. (2007). High stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001a). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001b). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.
Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., et al. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586–587.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 961–977.
Blenkinsop, S., McCrone, T., Wade, P., & Morris, M. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16? Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research, Department for Education and Skills (DfES).
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386.
Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9, 285–305.
Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183–197.
Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.
Buck, G. A., Plano, V. L., Diandra, C., Pelecky, L., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, V. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92, 688–707.
Butz, W. P., Bloom, G. A., Gross, M. E., Kelly, T. K., Kofner, A., & Rippen, H. E. (2003). Is there a shortage of scientists and engineers? How would we know? Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the inquiring mind: The challenge for school science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 471–486.
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313 (5791), 1307–1310.
Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education. (2003). Australia’s teachers: Australia’s future, advancing innovation, science, technology and mathematics – Background data and analysis. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education Science and Training (DEST), Commonwealth of Australia.
Crawley, F. E., & Coe, A. E. (1990). Determinants of middle school students’ intentions to enroll in a high school science course: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 461–476.
Cripps Clark, J. (2006). The role of practical activities in primary school science. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: Preparing teenagers for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(16), 318–334.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
DEST. (2006). Youth attitudes survey: Population study on the perceptions of science, mathematics and technology study at school and career decision making. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education Science and Training.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kazcala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivations (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H.Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1992). The development of achievement-task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.
Engineering and Technology Board. (2005). Factors influencing Year 9 career choices. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 15–30.
European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Falk, J., Dierking, L., & Spock, M. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Lanham, MD: Altamira.
Fouad, N., Byars-Winston, A., & Angela, M. (2005). Cultural context of career choice: Meta-analysis of race/ethnicity differences. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 223–233.
Fouad, N., Hackett, G., Haag, S., Kantamneni, N., & Fitzpatrick, M. E. (2007, August). Career choice barriers: Environmental influences on women’s career choices. paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Francis, B. (2000). The gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 35–48.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.
Garnett, P. J., & Tobin, K. (1989). Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practice in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 1–14.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689–703.
Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Gutstein, J., Smith, M., & Manahan, D. (2006). A service-learning model for science education outreach (Science Education Outreach Program). Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 22–26.
Haeusler, C., & Kay, R. (1997). School subject selection by students in the post-compulsory years. Australian Journal of Career Development, 6(1), 32–38.
Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of the values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11–21 year olds. London: Nestlé Social Research Programme.
Haste, H., Muldoon, C., Hogan, A., & Brosnan, M. (2008, September). If girls like ethics in their science and boys like gadgets, Can we get science education right? Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Liverpool, UK.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888.
Havard, N. (1996). Student attitudes to studying A-level sciences. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 321–330.
Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2008). A twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girls. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1003–1025.
Head, J. (1985). The personal response to science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14, 215–237.
Helme, S., & Lamb, S. (2007, July). Student experiences of VCE further mathematics. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Tasmania.
Henerson, M. E., Lyons Morris, L., & Taylor Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1987). How to measure attitudes. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hill, C. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology, 24(1),78–84.
HM Treasury. (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: Next steps. London: HMSO.
Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23, 41–57.
Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.
Jones, G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes towards science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192.
Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.
Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893.
Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559–641). London: McGraw-Hill.
Koballa, T. R., Jr. (1988). The determinants of female junior high school students’ intentions to enroll in elective physical science courses in high school: Testing the applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 479–492.
Krogh, L. B., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 281–302.
Lamb, S., & Ball, K. (1999). Curriculum and careers: The education and labour market consequences of Year 12 subject choice (Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth: Research report number 12). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Lee, J. D. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 75, 349–373.
Lee, M.-H., Wub, Y.-T., & Tsaic, C.-C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1999–2020.
Leonardi, A., Syngollitou, E., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Academic achievement, motivation and future selves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 153–163.
Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996a). Gendered career choice: Is sex-stereotyping the cause or the consequence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 133–146.
Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996b). The masculine image of careers in science and technology – Fact or fantasy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 231–246.
Lindahl, B. (2007, April). A longitudinal study of student’s’ attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Technology, New Orleans, LA.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lord Sainsbury of Turville. (2007). The race to the top: A review of government’s science and innovation policies. London: HM Treasury.
Lynn, L., & Salzman, H. (2006). Collaborative advantage: New horizons for a flat world. Issues in Science and Technology, Winter, 74–81.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experience of school science classes in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591–613.
Maltese, A. (2008). Persistence in STEM: An investigation of the relationship between high school experiences in science and mathematics and college degree completion in STEM fields. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Virginia, Charlotteville.
Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2008, April). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
McKinley, E. (2005). Brown bodies, white coats: Postcolonialism, Maori women and science. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 481–496.
McMahon, M., & Patton, W. (1997). School as an influence on the career development of students: Comments by young people and considerations for career educators. Australian Journal of Career Development, 6(1), 23–26.
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Merton, R. K. (Ed.). (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 9–98). New York: Collier Macmillan.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
Moore, R. W., & Sutman, F. X. (1970). The development, field test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 85–94.
Munby, H. (1982). The impropriety of “panel of judges” validation in science attitude scales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 617–619.
Munro, M., & Elsom, D. (2000). Choosing science at 16: The influence of science teachers and career advisers on students’ decisions about science subjects and science and technology careers. Cambridge: National Institute for Careers Education and Counselling (NICEC).
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s attitudes towards school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study (Final Report to the Wellcome Trust). London: Wellcome Trust.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of research of participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.
National Academy of Sciences: Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Sciences.
National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it’s too late. Washington: US Department of Education.
OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
Ogura, Y. (2006). TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72, 143–155.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Osborne, J. F. (2008). Engaging young people with science: Does science education need a new vision? School Science Review, 89(328), 67–74.
Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441–468.
Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2007). Research on learning in informal contexts: Advancing the field? International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1441–1445.
Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.
Owen, S. V., Toepperwein, M. A., Marshall, C. E., Lichtenstein, M. J., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., et al. (2008). Finding pearls: Psychometric reevaluation of the Simpson-Troost Attitude Questionnaire (STAQ). Science Education, 92, 1076–1095.
Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 847–862.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.
Putnam, R. (2001). Communtiy-based social capital and educational performance. In D. Ravitich & J. Viteritti (Eds.), Making good citizens: Education and civil society (pp. 58–95). London: Yale University Press.
Putnam, R. (2004). Education, diversity, social cohesion and “social capital”. Paper presented at the Raising the Quality of Learning for All conference. [Online: http://unjobs.org/authors/robert-d.-putnam]
Rennie, L. (2006). Learning science outside of school. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–170). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Research Councils UK. (2008). Public attitudes to science 2008: A survey. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.
Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrics, 73, 417–458.
Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to Science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–59.
Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden: Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science – Seen as signs of late modern identities. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction – Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69, 511–526.
Simpson, R. D., & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences of committment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.
Solomon, J. (1980). Teaching children in the laboratory. London: Croom Helm.
Sparkes, R. A. (1995). No problem here! The supply of physics teachers in Scotland. The Curriculum Journal, 6(1), 101–113.
Stagg, P. (2007). Careers from science: An investigation for the Science Education Forum. Warwick, UK: Centre for Education and Industry (CEI).
Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1145.
Teitelbaum, M. (2007). Do we need more scientists and engineers? Paper presented at the Conference on National Value of Science Education, University of Warwick, UK.
The Research Business. (1994). Views of science among students, teachers and parents. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.
The Royal Society. (2006). Taking a leading role. London: The Royal Society.
Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 3–25.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan.
Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: Developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 30, 273–298.
Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K., Clark, J. C., Tomei, A., et al. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary school transition. A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics engagement at Primary-Secondary transition (Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.
Tytler, R., Symington, D., Kirkwood, V., & Malcolm, C. (2008). Engaging students in authentic science through school-community links: Learning from the rural experience. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(3), 13–18.
Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41, 19–38.
Tytler, R., Waldrip, B., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Windows into practice: Constructing effective science teaching and learning in a school change initiative. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 171–194.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. Longman: New York.
Walker, E. (2007). The structure and culture of developing a mathematics tutoring collaborative in an urban high school. High School Journal, 91(1), 57–67.
Walker, K. (2006). Aiming high: Australian school leavers’ career aspirations and the implications for career development practice. Australian Journal of Career Development, 15(2), 53–60.
Walker, K., Alloway, N., Dalley-Trim, L., & Patterson, A. (2006). Counsellor practices and student perspectives: Perceptions of career counselling in Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Career Development, 15(1), 37–45.
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
Watt, H. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107–116.
Wayne, A., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.
Whitfield, R. C. (1980). Educational research & science teaching. School Science Review, 60, 411–430.
Woolnough, B. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Yager, R. E., & Penick, J. E. (1986). Perception of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science. Science and Education, 70, 355–363.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tytler, R., Osborne, J. (2012). Student Attitudes and Aspirations Towards Science. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9040-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9041-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)