Skip to main content

Student Attitudes and Aspirations Towards Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Science Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 24))

Abstract

Research on student attitudes and aspirations towards science has been an increasing focus of concern in the past decade. Much of this is driven by a growing concern about students’ lack of interest in the further study of science in advanced societies. Because attitude to science is a multifaceted construct, the chapter first reviews research into attitudes in order to develop principles for its meaningful measurement. We then explore the main features of student responses to science and examine the common assertion that there is a negative downward trend as many have suggested. Recent research clearly shows a negative correlation between a country’s developmental index and student attitudes to science. The effects of gender, teacher quality and pre-adolescent experience on student attitudes and aspirations towards science are examined in some detail, as well as a number of other factors in attempting to understand the complex pathways and choices that students make throughout their schooling about the study of STEM subjects. The construct of identity is used to make sense of the variety of attitudes and aspirations of students towards science, with particular emphasis on gender and youth in post-industrial societies. Finally, the role of enrichment experiences in science is examined, as a real and potential influence on student engagement with science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2008). Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of study: Cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1557–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G., Calabrese, A., & Chinn, P. (2006). FORUM: Toward a politics of place-based science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching. York, UK: Dialogos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, N., Dalley, L., Patterson, A., Walker, K., & Lenoy, M. (2004). School students making education and career decisions: Aspirations, attitudes and influences: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L., Hollingworth, S., & Halsall, A. (2007). ‘University’s not for me – I’m a Nike person’: Urban, working-class young people’s negotiations of ‘style’, identity and education. Sociology, 41, 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment of Performance Unit. (1988). Science at age 15: A review of the APU survey findings. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. (2007). High stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001a). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001b). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., et al. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. New York: McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M. J., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In pursuit of validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude instruments. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blenkinsop, S., McCrone, T., Wade, P., & Morris, M. (2006). How do young people make choices at 14 and 16? Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research, Department for Education and Skills (DfES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breakwell, G. M., & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, G. A., Plano, V. L., Diandra, C., Pelecky, L., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, V. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92, 688–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, W. P., Bloom, G. A., Gross, M. E., Kelly, T. K., Kofner, A., & Rippen, H. E. (2003). Is there a shortage of scientists and engineers? How would we know? Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the inquiring mind: The challenge for school science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313 (5791), 1307–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Review of Teaching and Teacher Education. (2003). Australia’s teachers: Australia’s future, advancing innovation, science, technology and mathematics – Background data and analysis. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education Science and Training (DEST), Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, F. E., & Coe, A. E. (1990). Determinants of middle school students’ intentions to enroll in a high school science course: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps Clark, J. (2006). The role of practical activities in primary school science. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: Preparing teenagers for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(16), 318–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2006). Youth attitudes survey: Population study on the perceptions of science, mathematics and technology study at school and career decision making. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kazcala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivations (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H.Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1992). The development of achievement-task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering and Technology Board. (2005). Factors influencing Year 9 career choices. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists: Report by the high level group on increasing human resources for science and technology. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., Dierking, L., & Spock, M. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Lanham, MD: Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N., Byars-Winston, A., & Angela, M. (2005). Cultural context of career choice: Meta-analysis of race/ethnicity differences. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N., Hackett, G., Haag, S., Kantamneni, N., & Fitzpatrick, M. E. (2007, August). Career choice barriers: Environmental influences on women’s career choices. paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000). The gendered subject: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P. J., & Tobin, K. (1989). Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practice in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 689–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, J., Smith, M., & Manahan, D. (2006). A service-learning model for science education outreach (Science Education Outreach Program). Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeusler, C., & Kay, R. (1997). School subject selection by students in the post-compulsory years. Australian Journal of Career Development, 6(1), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H. (2004). Science in my future: A study of the values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11–21 year olds. London: Nestlé Social Research Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haste, H., Muldoon, C., Hogan, A., & Brosnan, M. (2008, September). If girls like ethics in their science and boys like gadgets, Can we get science education right? Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Liverpool, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havard, N. (1996). Student attitudes to studying A-level sciences. Public Understanding of Science, 5, 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2008). A twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girls. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1003–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, J. (1985). The personal response to science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helme, S., & Lamb, S. (2007, July). Student experiences of VCE further mathematics. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henerson, M. E., Lyons Morris, L., & Taylor Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1987). How to measure attitudes. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology, 24(1),78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury. (2006). Science and innovation investment framework: Next steps. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes towards science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559–641). London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koballa, T. R., Jr. (1988). The determinants of female junior high school students’ intentions to enroll in elective physical science courses in high school: Testing the applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogh, L. B., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., & Ball, K. (1999). Curriculum and careers: The education and labour market consequences of Year 12 subject choice (Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth: Research report number 12). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 75, 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-H., Wub, Y.-T., & Tsaic, C.-C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1999–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, A., Syngollitou, E., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1998). Academic achievement, motivation and future selves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996a). Gendered career choice: Is sex-stereotyping the cause or the consequence? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996b). The masculine image of careers in science and technology – Fact or fantasy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, B. (2007, April). A longitudinal study of student’s’ attitudes towards science and choice of career. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Technology, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Sainsbury of Turville. (2007). The race to the top: A review of government’s science and innovation policies. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L., & Salzman, H. (2006). Collaborative advantage: New horizons for a flat world. Issues in Science and Technology, Winter, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experience of school science classes in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 591–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltese, A. (2008). Persistence in STEM: An investigation of the relationship between high school experiences in science and mathematics and college degree completion in STEM fields. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Virginia, Charlotteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2008, April). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E. (2005). Brown bodies, white coats: Postcolonialism, Maori women and science. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M., & Patton, W. (1997). School as an influence on the career development of students: Comments by young people and considerations for career educators. Australian Journal of Career Development, 6(1), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (Ed.). (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 9–98). New York: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. W., & Sutman, F. X. (1970). The development, field test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H. (1982). The impropriety of “panel of judges” validation in science attitude scales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 617–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, M., & Elsom, D. (2000). Choosing science at 16: The influence of science teachers and career advisers on students’ decisions about science subjects and science and technology careers. Cambridge: National Institute for Careers Education and Counselling (NICEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s attitudes towards school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study (Final Report to the Wellcome Trust). London: Wellcome Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of research of participation of girls in physics. London: Institute of Physics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences: Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it’s too late. Washington: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura, Y. (2006). TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F. (2008). Engaging young people with science: Does science education need a new vision? School Science Review, 89(328), 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 441–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2007). Research on learning in informal contexts: Advancing the field? International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1441–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, S. V., Toepperwein, M. A., Marshall, C. E., Lichtenstein, M. J., Blalock, C. L., Liu, Y., et al. (2008). Finding pearls: Psychometric reevaluation of the Simpson-Troost Attitude Questionnaire (STAQ). Science Education, 92, 1076–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 847–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2001). Communtiy-based social capital and educational performance. In D. Ravitich & J. Viteritti (Eds.), Making good citizens: Education and civil society (pp. 58–95). London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2004). Education, diversity, social cohesion and “social capital”. Paper presented at the Raising the Quality of Learning for All conference. [Online: http://unjobs.org/authors/robert-d.-putnam]

  • Rennie, L. (2006). Learning science outside of school. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–170). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Councils UK. (2008). Public attitudes to science 2008: A survey. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrics, 73, 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to Science: An update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden: Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science – Seen as signs of late modern identities. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction – Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69, 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D., & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences of committment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1980). Teaching children in the laboratory. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R. A. (1995). No problem here! The supply of physics teachers in Scotland. The Curriculum Journal, 6(1), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagg, P. (2007). Careers from science: An investigation for the Science Education Forum. Warwick, UK: Centre for Education and Industry (CEI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, M. (2007). Do we need more scientists and engineers? Paper presented at the Conference on National Value of Science Education, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Research Business. (1994). Views of science among students, teachers and parents. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Royal Society. (2006). Taking a leading role. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: Developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 30, 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Osborne, J. F., Williams, G., Tytler, K., Clark, J. C., Tomei, A., et al. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the Primary-Secondary school transition. A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics engagement at Primary-Secondary transition (Commissioned by the Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., Kirkwood, V., & Malcolm, C. (2008). Engaging students in authentic science through school-community links: Learning from the rural experience. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(3), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Waldrip, B., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Windows into practice: Constructing effective science teaching and learning in a school change initiative. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. Longman: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. (2007). The structure and culture of developing a mathematics tutoring collaborative in an urban high school. High School Journal, 91(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (2006). Aiming high: Australian school leavers’ career aspirations and the implications for career development practice. Australian Journal of Career Development, 15(2), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., Alloway, N., Dalley-Trim, L., & Patterson, A. (2006). Counsellor practices and student perspectives: Perceptions of career counselling in Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Career Development, 15(1), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, R. C. (1980). Educational research & science teaching. School Science Review, 60, 411–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, B. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E., & Penick, J. E. (1986). Perception of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science. Science and Education, 70, 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Tytler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tytler, R., Osborne, J. (2012). Student Attitudes and Aspirations Towards Science. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics