Family-Supportive Work Environments: The Role of Organizational Perceptions

doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Volume 58, Issue 3, June 2001, Pages 414-435

https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774 Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study examines global employee perceptions regarding the extent their work organization is family-supportive (FSOP). Data gathered from 522 participants employed in a variety of occupations and organizations indicated that FSOP responses related significantly to the number of family-friendly benefits offered by the organization, benefit usage, and perceived family support from supervisors. FSOP responses also explained a significant amount of unique variance associated with work–family conflict, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions above and beyond the variance explained by the number of family-friendly benefits available by the organization and supervisor support. Results indicated that FSOP mediates the relationship between family-friendly benefits available and the dependent variables of work–family conflict, affective commitment, and job satisfaction. FSOP also mediated the relationship between supervisor support and work–family conflict. The results underscore the important role that perceptions of the overall work environment play in determining employee reactions to family-friendly benefit policies.

References (56)

S. Aryee et al.
Role stressors, interrole conflict, and well-being: The moderating influence of spousal support and coping behaviors among employed parents in Hong Kong
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1999)
M.R. Frone et al.
Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1997)
A.A. Grandey et al.
The conservation of resources model applied to work–family conflict and strain
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1999)
T.R. Hinkin
A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations
Journal of Management
(1995)
R.E. Kopelman et al.
A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
(1983)
C.A. Thompson et al.
When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(1999)
T.D. Allen et al.
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
(2000)
T.D. Allen et al.
Parental leave of absence: Some not so family friendly implications
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
(1999)
B.B. Baltes et al.
Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1999)
J.T. Bond et al.
The 1997 national study of the changing workplace.
(1998)

C. Cammann et al.

The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire.

(1979)

K.E. Christensen et al.

Flextime: A viable solution to work/family conflict?

Journal of Family Issues

(1990)

J. Cohen et al.

Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.

(1982)

R. Cropanzano et al.

Dispositional affectivity as a predictor of work attitudes and job performance

Journal of Organizational Behavior

(1993)

M.A. Donovan et al.

The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace

Journal of Applied Psychology

(1998)

R. Eisenberger et al.

Perceived organizational support

Journal of Applied Psychology

(1986)

J. Fierman

Are companies less family-friendly?

Fortune

(1994, March 21)

Fletcher, J., & Bailyn, L.1996. Challenging the last boundary: Reconnecting work and family. In M. B. Arthur & D. M....

D.E. Friedman

Work and family: The new strategic plan

Human Resource Planning

(1990)

Friedman, D. E., & Galinsky, E.1992. Work and family issues: A legitimate business concern. In S. Zedeck Ed., Work,...

Friedman, D. E., & Johnson, A. A.1997. Moving from programs to culture change: The next stage for the corporate...

E. Galinsky et al.

The impact of human resource policies on employees

Journal of Family Issues

(1990)

Gilbert, L. A., Hallett, M., & Eldridge, N. S.1994. Gender and dual-career families: Implications and applications for...

J. Glass et al.

Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies

Work and Occupations

(1995)

S.J. Goff et al.

Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study

Personnel Psychology

(1990)

S.L. Grover et al.

Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents

Personnel Psychology

(1995)

L.R. James et al.

Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation

Journal of Applied Psychology

(1984)

Cited by (1234)

A meta-analytic review of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs): Work-family related antecedents, outcomes, and a theory-driven comparison of two mediating mechanisms
2024, Journal of Vocational Behavior
This quantitative review systematically integrates the antecedents and outcomes of Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSBs) through bivariate meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM). Utilizing data from 231 primary studies, which are drawn from 213 sources (N = 118, 100), we examined a set of hypotheses exploring the antecedents and consequences of FSSBs. We also conducted a comparative analysis of the explanatory power of two theoretical perspectives: the resource-based view (operationalized as work-family conflict and work-family enrichment) and the social-exchange perspective (operationalized as leader-member exchange relationship). Our results showed that the social-exchange perspective accounted for a greater proportion of FSSBs' impacts on work outcomes (i.e., in-role performance, and job satisfaction), while the resource-based perspective predominantly elucidates FSSBs' influence on employee wellbeing (i.e., burnout). In doing this, we unveiled nuanced insights into the nomological network surrounding FSSBs. Based on these results, we develop a future map for this growing body of research.
Who is to blame for incivility? The influences of family undermining on employee incivility towards customers
2024, Journal of Business Research
Drawing on self-regulation theory, we examined the relationship between family undermining and employee incivility towards customers on a daily basis. We propose that daily family undermining is related not only to daily rumination about family but also to daily anxiety, and in turn, more daily employee incivility towards customers. In addition, we argue that a higher (vs. lower) level of family-supportive supervision at the between-person level weakens the effects of daily family undermining on daily rumination about family and daily anxiety. Multilevel analyses of daily survey data from 247 employees support the hypotheses. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed and future directions for research are suggested.
Mediation of work-family support and affective commitment between family supportive supervisor Behaviour and workplace deviance
2023, Heliyon
Employees' Workplace Deviant Behavior (WDB) is an organizational threat to its sustainability. This study examines the impact of the supervisors’ role in improving organizational behavior because of the gap in the body of knowledge indicating the inconsistency, paucity, and uncertainties of relationships between variables when relating to their underpinning theories. The conceptualized model consists of the impact of family supportive supervisor behavior (FSSB) on workers' workplace deviant behavior (WDB) while considering Affective Commitment and Work-Family Supportive Behavior Attribution between the key variables. In terms of methodology, this quantitative study analyzed 321 valid surveys through descriptive and inferential statistics to ascertain if FSSB negatively impacts employees' WDB. As findings and novelty of this study, FSSB is found to negatively affect employees' WDB, while affective commitment mediates between FSSB and employees' WDB. Work-family supportive behavior attribution and personal life attribution of employees moderated the negative relationship between affective commitment and WDB, while work productivity attribution of employees had no significant effect as a moderator. With three (out of four) hypotheses supported by empirical evidence, this research has broadened previous studies of workers' WDB and offers organizations theoretical and practical recommendations for managing employees' WDB. More studies could be conducted in the future to address limitations in this research, examine other related theories in a new context, location, and/or culture, or select other suitable research methods.
Work–family interference in urban China: gender discrimination and the effects of work–family balance policies
2024, npj Urban Sustainability
Childcare Balancing Policy in Japanese Corporations and Women’s Fertility Intention
2024, Social Sciences
Remote Work, Gender Ideologies, and Fathers’ Participation in Childcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic
2024, Social Sciences

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Regular ArticleFamily-Supportive Work Environments: The Role of Organizational Perceptions

Abstract

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Journal of Management

Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Parental leave of absence: Some not so family friendly implications

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria

Journal of Applied Psychology

The 1997 national study of the changing workplace.

The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire.

Flextime: A viable solution to work/family conflict?

Journal of Family Issues

Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.

Dispositional affectivity as a predictor of work attitudes and job performance

Journal of Organizational Behavior

The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace

Journal of Applied Psychology

Perceived organizational support

Journal of Applied Psychology

Are companies less family-friendly?

Fortune

Work and family: The new strategic plan

Human Resource Planning

The impact of human resource policies on employees

Journal of Family Issues

Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies

Work and Occupations

Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study

Personnel Psychology

Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents

Personnel Psychology

Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation

Journal of Applied Psychology

Regular Article
Family-Supportive Work Environments: The Role of Organizational Perceptions