Abstract
Based on an ecosystem view of innovation management and in-depth case studies of firms in China and abroad, a novel paradigm of innovation management—Total Innovation Management (TIM)—is put forward in this paper. This new paradigm draws on three distinct areas of recent research, namely the innovation theory of the firm, the resource-based view (RBV), and the complexity theory. It introduces the theoretical framework of TIM, and presents a tri-dimensional innovation strategy model, which includes all elements of innovation, all innovators, and innovation in all times and spaces, and aims at value added and created.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“ ” is the Chinese word, pronounced “quan”, for “all” or “total” or “comprehensive.”
References
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Barton, L. (1992). Core capability and core rigidities. Strategy Management Journal, 13(5), 111–126.
Bean, R., & Radford, R. W. (2001). The business of innovation: Managing the corporate imagination for maximum results. New York: AMACOM.
Braun, C.-F. v. (1997). The innovation war. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chen, J. (1999). The systematic view and framework on technology innovation. Journal of Management Sciences in China (Chinese Journal), 2(3), 66–73.
Chen, J. (2002). The challenge of R&D globalization and the management task. Management Review (Chinese Journal, 11(11), 50–55.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). The determinants of organizational change and structure inertia: Technological and organizational factors. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11(4), 595–635.
Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, 31(2), 273–290.
Davis, L. E., & North, D. C. (1970). Institutional change and american economic growth: A first step towards a theory of institutional innovation. Journal of Economic History, 30(1), 131–149.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.
Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi, R. Nelson, & C. Freeman (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Printer.
Haken, H. (1984). Synergetics (Chinese Version Translated by Xishen Xu). Beijing: Atom Press.
Hamel, G., & Heene, A. (1994). Competence-based competition. London: John Wiley and Sons.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. New York: Harper Business.
Hardy, C., & Dougherty, D. (1997). Powering product innovation. European Management Journal, 15(1), 16–27.
Heene, A., & Sanchez, R. (1997). Competence-based strategic management. Chichester: John Wiley.
Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration: Making critical choices in a dynamic world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Janszen, F. (2000). The age of innovation: Making business creativity a competence. Not a coincidence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Jiang, H., & Chen, J. (2000). Integrated innovation patterns. Management of Science and Research (Chinese Journal), 21(5), 31–39.
Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management, 19(2), 121–139.
Kim, L. (1996). From imitation to innovation: Dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355–378.
Markides, C. C. (1999). A dynamic view of strategy. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 55–63.
Menke, M., Xu, Q., & Gu, L. An analysis of the universality, flexibility and agility of total innovation management—a case study of Hewlett-Packard. Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
Myer, S., & Marquis, D. J. (1969). Successful industrial innovation: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. Washington DC, National Science Foundation.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Packard, D., Kirby, D., & Lewis, K. R. (1995). The Hp way: How bill Hewlett and I built our company. New York: HarperBusiness.
Padmore, T., Schuetze, H., & Gibson, H. (1998). Modeling systems of innovation: An enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26(6), 605–624.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141–156.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
Pfeffer, J. (1999). Leader to leader. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.
Rothwell, R. (1992). Developments towards the fifth generation model of innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 4(1), 73–75.
Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.
Roussel, P. A., Saad, K. N., & Erickson, T. J. (1991). Third generation R&D: Managing the link to corporate strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European Management Journal, 15(3), 303–317.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shapiro, S. M. (2001). 24/7 Innovation: A blueprint for surviving and thriving in an age of change. New York: McGraw Hill.
Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Tidd, J., Bessant J. R., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Tucker, R. B. (2002). Driving growth through innovation: How leading firms are transforming their futures. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E. Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
Wheatley, M. J. (2001). We are all innovators. In: F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, & I. Somerville (Eds.), Leading for innovation: And organizing for results (pp. 11–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431.
Wu, X. (1995). Evolution process of secondary innovation. Science and Research Management (Chinese Journal), 16(2), 27–35.
Xu, Q. (2000). Management of research, development and technology-based innovation. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Xu, Q., Chen, J., & Guo, B. (1997). A theoretic model and an empirical analysis of technology innovation portfolio. Science and Research Management (Chinese Journal), 18(3), 29–35.
Xu, Q., Chen, J., & Guo, B. (1998). Perspective of technology innovation and technology management in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 381–387.
Xu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2001). The basic law and pattern of firm’s business management. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
Xu, Q., Guo, B., Pei, H., & Shen, S. (1997). Managing technology innovation portfolio: Experiences and lessons from China. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Xu, Q., Yu, Z., Zheng, G., & Zhou, Z. (2002) Towards capability-based Total Innovation Management (Tim): The emerging new trend of innovation management—a case study of Haier Group. ISMOT & ICMIT’02, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China: Zhejiang University Press.
Xu, Q., Zhu, L., Zheng, G., & Wang, F., Haier’s Tao of innovation: A case study of the emerging Total Innovation Management (Tim) model. Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper was under the project #70372018 supported by NSFC
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Q., Chen, J., Xie, Z. et al. Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. J Technol Transfer 32, 9–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x