Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on an ecosystem view of innovation management and in-depth case studies of firms in China and abroad, a novel paradigm of innovation management—Total Innovation Management (TIM)—is put forward in this paper. This new paradigm draws on three distinct areas of recent research, namely the innovation theory of the firm, the resource-based view (RBV), and the complexity theory. It introduces the theoretical framework of TIM, and presents a tri-dimensional innovation strategy model, which includes all elements of innovation, all innovators, and innovation in all times and spaces, and aims at value added and created.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ” is the Chinese word, pronounced “quan”, for “all” or “total” or “comprehensive.”

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, L. (1992). Core capability and core rigidities. Strategy Management Journal, 13(5), 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, R., & Radford, R. W. (2001). The business of innovation: Managing the corporate imagination for maximum results. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, C.-F. v. (1997). The innovation war. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (1999). The systematic view and framework on technology innovation. Journal of Management Sciences in China (Chinese Journal), 2(3), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2002). The challenge of R&D globalization and the management task. Management Review (Chinese Journal, 11(11), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). The determinants of organizational change and structure inertia: Technological and organizational factors. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11(4), 595–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, 31(2), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. E., & North, D. C. (1970). Institutional change and american economic growth: A first step towards a theory of institutional innovation. Journal of Economic History, 30(1), 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi, R. Nelson, & C. Freeman (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. (1984). Synergetics (Chinese Version Translated by Xishen Xu). Beijing: Atom Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Heene, A. (1994). Competence-based competition. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Dougherty, D. (1997). Powering product innovation. European Management Journal, 15(1), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heene, A., & Sanchez, R. (1997). Competence-based strategic management. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration: Making critical choices in a dynamic world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janszen, F. (2000). The age of innovation: Making business creativity a competence. Not a coincidence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., & Chen, J. (2000). Integrated innovation patterns. Management of Science and Research (Chinese Journal), 21(5), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. (1999). Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge-management. International Journal of Information Management, 19(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1996). From imitation to innovation: Dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C. C. (1999). A dynamic view of strategy. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke, M., Xu, Q., & Gu, L. An analysis of the universality, flexibility and agility of total innovation management—a case study of Hewlett-Packard. Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).

  • Myer, S., & Marquis, D. J. (1969). Successful industrial innovation: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. Washington DC, National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, D., Kirby, D., & Lewis, K. R. (1995). The Hp way: How bill Hewlett and I built our company. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmore, T., Schuetze, H., & Gibson, H. (1998). Modeling systems of innovation: An enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26(6), 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1999). Leader to leader. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1992). Developments towards the fifth generation model of innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 4(1), 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P. A., Saad, K. N., & Erickson, T. J. (1991). Third generation R&D: Managing the link to corporate strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European Management Journal, 15(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. M. (2001). 24/7 Innovation: A blueprint for surviving and thriving in an age of change. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant J. R., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, R. B. (2002). Driving growth through innovation: How leading firms are transforming their futures. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E. Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. J. (2001). We are all innovators. In: F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, & I. Somerville (Eds.), Leading for innovation: And organizing for results (pp. 11–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. (1995). Evolution process of secondary innovation. Science and Research Management (Chinese Journal), 16(2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q. (2000). Management of research, development and technology-based innovation. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Chen, J., & Guo, B. (1997). A theoretic model and an empirical analysis of technology innovation portfolio. Science and Research Management (Chinese Journal), 18(3), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Chen, J., & Guo, B. (1998). Perspective of technology innovation and technology management in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., & Chen, Z. (2001). The basic law and pattern of firm’s business management. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Guo, B., Pei, H., & Shen, S. (1997). Managing technology innovation portfolio: Experiences and lessons from China. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, Oregon, USA.

  • Xu, Q., Yu, Z., Zheng, G., & Zhou, Z. (2002) Towards capability-based Total Innovation Management (Tim): The emerging new trend of innovation management—a case study of Haier Group. ISMOT & ICMIT’02, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China: Zhejiang University Press.

  • Xu, Q., Zhu, L., Zheng, G., & Wang, F., Haier’s Tao of innovation: A case study of the emerging Total Innovation Management (Tim) model. Journal of Technology Transfer (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingrui Xu.

Additional information

This paper was under the project #70372018 supported by NSFC

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Chen, J., Xie, Z. et al. Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. J Technol Transfer 32, 9–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation