Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the influence of product perception and geometric features

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research in emotional design and Kansei Engineering has shown that aesthetics play a significant role in the appeal of a product. This paper contributes to establishing a methodology to identify the relationships between perceptions, aesthetic features, desire to own and background of consumers. Surveys were conducted with 71 participants to gather their perceptions of 11 vase concepts. Advanced statistical analyses, including mixed models, were applied to allow generalisation of the results beyond the data sample. Significant relations between the desire to own a product and how the product is perceived were found (the desire to own was found to be related to beautiful, expensive, elegant, exciting, feminine, common and dynamic vases), as well as between the perceptions and the parameters describing the form of the vases (a vase was perceived as beautiful if it had many curved lines and was simple and tall). An automated mixed model analysis was conducted and revealed that general rules can be found between aesthetic features, perceptions and ownership, which can apply across gender and culture. The findings include design rules that link aesthetic features with perceptions. These contribute to research as guidelines for design synthesis and can either be implemented via shape grammars or parametric modelling approaches. These rules are also interesting for 3D printing applications, especially important when the consumer is the designer. Some of these design rules are linked to the desire to own a product, they have implications for industry, and they offer guidelines to creating attractive products that people want to own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achiche S, Ahmed S (2008) Mapping shape geometry and emotions using fuzzy logic. In: ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference

  • Achiche S, Ahmed-Kristensen S (2011) Genetic fuzzy modeling of user perception of three-dimensional shapes. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 25:93–107. doi:10.1017/S0890060410000466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed S, Boelskifte P (2006) Investigation of designers intentions and a users perception of product character. In: Proceedings of the NORD conference

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1-7

  • Berkowitz EN, Kerin RA, Hartley SW, Rudelius W (1994) Marketing. In: Irwin RD (Ed), 4th edn. Burr Ridge

  • Blijlevens J, Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2009) How consumers perceive product appearance: the identification of three product appearance attributes. Int J Des 3:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J Mark 59:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunel FF, Kumar R (2007) Design and the big five: linking visual product aesthetics to product personality. Adv Consum Res N Am Conf Proc 34:238–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry K (2012) Theories of emotion. Major theories of emotion. http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologytopics/a/theories-of-emotion.htm

  • Colwill J, Childs THC, de Pennington A, Rait J, Robins TM, Jones K, Workman C et al (2003) Affective design (Kansei Engineering) in Japan: a report from a DTI International Technology Service Mission. Faraday Packaging Partnership, Leeds

  • Choungourian A (1968) Color preferences and cultural variation. Percept Mot Skills 26:1203–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choungourian A (1969) Color preferences: a cross-cultural and cross-sectional study. Percept Mot Skills 28:801–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques. In: Wiley (ed), 3rd edn. New York

  • Desmet PMA (2010) Three levels of product emotion. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Kansei engineering and emotion research, pp 238–248

  • Dwayne Ball A, Tasaki LH (1992) The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. J Consum Psychol 1:155–172. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80055-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (1995) Aesthetic value. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Govers PCM, Schoormans JPL (2005) Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. J Consum Mark 22:189–197. doi:10.1108/07363760510605308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve KW (1991) Traditional beliefs and colour perception. Percept Mot Skills 72:1319–1323. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. 1st edn. SAS Publishing

  • Hekkert P (2006) Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychol Sci 48:157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert P (2014) Aesthetic responses to design: a battle of impulses. In: Smith T, Tinio P (eds) Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 277–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao K-A, Chen L-L (2006) Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes. Int J Ind Ergon 36:553–564. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu S, Chuang M, Chang C (2000) A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception. Int J Ind Ergon 25:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G (2009) Theories of emotions. In: Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/emotion/#H2. Accessed 14 Feb 2012

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan P (2000) The four pleasures designing pleasurable products. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 11–57

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Rath GA (1984) Design: a powerful but neglected strategic tool. J Bus Strateg 5(2):16–21

  • Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2015a) LmerTest: tests in linear mixed effect models. R package version 2.0-25. http://cran.r-project.org/package=lmerTest

  • Kuznetsova A, Christensen RHB, Bavay C, Brockhoff PB (2015b) Automated mixed ANOVA modeling of sensory and consumer data. Food Qual Prefer 40:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai H-HH, Chang Y-MM, Chang H-CC (2005) A robust design approach for enhancing the feeling quality of a product: a car profile case study. Int J Ind Ergon 35:445–460. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2004.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B (1983) How designers think: the design process demystified. Architectural Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathworks (2012) MATLAB: documentation. http://www.mathworks.co.jp/help/techdoc. Accessed 27 April 2012

  • McManus IC, Jones AL, Cottrell J, McManus IC, Amanda LJ, Jill C (1981) The aesthetics of colour. Perception 10:651–666. doi:10.1068/p100651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers D (2004) Theories of emotion, 7th edn. Worth Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony A, Turner TJ (1990) What’s basic about basic emotions? Psycol Rev 97:315–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn S, Cagan J, Boatwright P (2009) Quantifying aesthetic form preference in a utility function. J Mech Eng 131:61001–61010. doi:10.1115/1.3116260

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou LC, Luo MR, Woodcock A, Wright A (2004) A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: colour emotions for single colours. Color Res Appl 29:232–240. doi:10.1002/col.20010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez Mata M, Ahmed-Kristensen S (2015) Principles for designing for perceptions. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on engineering design (ICED 15), vol 9. User-Centred Design Socio-Technical Systems, Milan, 27–30 July 2015, pp 239–248

  • Perez Mata M, Ahmed-Kristensen S, Yanagisawa H (2013) Perception of aesthetics in consumer Products. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on engineering design (ICED13). Design for Harmonies, Design Society, vol 7, pp 527–536

  • Pham B (1999) Design for aesthetics: interactions of design variables and aesthetic properties. In: SPIE IS&T/SPIE 11th annual symposium on electronic imaging’ 99, pp 364–371

  • Roussos L, Dentsoras A (2013) Formulation and use of criteria for the evaluation of aesthetic attributes of products in engineering design. In: International conference on engineering design ICED13, pp 1–10

  • Schifferstein HNJ, Zwartkruis-Pelgrim E (2008) Consumer-product attachment: measurement and design implications. Int J Des 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütte S, Eklund J (2005) Design of rocker switches for work-vehicles: an application of Kansei Engineering. Appl Ergon 36:557–567. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft I (2013) Electronic statistics textbook. StatSoft, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT (2006) Aesthetics in design. In: Design: Creation of artifacts in society, Pontifica Press

  • Van Bremen EJJ, Knoop WG, Horvath I et al (1998) Developing a methodology for design for aesthetics based on analogy of communication. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ASME design engineering technical conferences

  • Weinberg P, Gottwald W (1982) Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions. J Bus Res 10:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer M (1938) Laws of organization in perceptual forms: a source book gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, pp 71–88

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa H, Fukuda S (2005) Interactive reduct evolutional computation for aesthetic design. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 5:1. doi:10.1115/1.1846055

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Stelton and the industrial designers for provision of the vase concepts and thank the participants who kindly undertook the study and the reviewers for their valuable feedback. The authors also thank Sofiane Achiche for his contribution in the design of the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Marta Perez Mata

  2. Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen

  3. Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

    Per Brunn Brockhoff

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan

    Hideyoshi Yanagisawa

Authors
  1. Marta Perez Mata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Per Brunn Brockhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hideyoshi Yanagisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Perez Mata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perez Mata, M., Ahmed-Kristensen, S., Brockhoff, P.B. et al. Investigating the influence of product perception and geometric features. Res Eng Design 28, 357–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0244-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0244-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation