Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archival Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article follows the history of tissue culture through its standardization as a technology, instrument, and ubiquitous object of reference for scientists working with cells. It identifies how human cells are established as cell lines and become records. As information infrastructure, cell lines have consequences for key archival concepts that rely on narratives of origin, bodies, and recorded information. The article contributes to a theory of the record by looking at cells in functional contexts of tissue culture, from the establishment of reference lines to the identification of cross-culture contamination, to their storage and dissemination. It puts forth a theory of the biorecord by examining acts of formalization in the standardization of scientific recordkeeping in biotechnology. The paper speaks to archival studies of scientific recordkeeping and argues for an expansion of research that examines nonprototypical records in functional contexts of creation, use, and processes of standardization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akmon D, Zimmerman A, Daniels M, Hedstrom M (2011) The application of archival concepts to a data-intensive environment: working with scientists to understand data management and preservation needs. Arch Sci 11(3–4):329–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K (2012) The footprint and the stepping foot: archival records, evidence, and time. Arch Sci. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9193-2

  • Bearman DA (1993) Record-keeping systems. Archivaria 36:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet J, Subsoontorn P, Endy D (2012) Rewritable digital data storage in live cells via engineered control of recombination directionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(23):8884–8889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botticelli P (2000) Records appraisal in network organizations. Archivaria 49:161–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker GC (2000) Biodiversity datadiversity. Soc Stud Sci 30(5):643–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker GC (2005) Memory practices in the sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bud R (1994) The uses of life: a history of biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehring GC, Eby EA, Eby MJ (2004) Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 40:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrel A (1912) On the permanent life of tissues outside of the organism. J Exp Med 15:516–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (1997) What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43:17–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook T (2001) Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Arch Sci 1:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle R (1997) On beyond living: rhetorical transformations of the life sciences. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards J, Harvey P, Wade P (2010) Technologized images, technologized bodies. Berghahn Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1984) What is enlightenment? In: Rabinow P (ed) The Foucault reader. Pantheon Foucault, New York, pp 32–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartler S (1967) Genetic markers as tracers in cell culture. Second decennial review conference on cell tissue and organ culture. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 26:167–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Gey GO (1933) An improved technic for massive tissue culture. Am J Cancer 17:752–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold M (1985) A conspiracy of cells: one woman’s legacy and the medical scandal it caused. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracy KF (2004) Documenting communities of practice: making the case for archival ethnography*. Arch Sci 4:335–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (1982) The high cost of information in post-world war II evolutionary biology: ergonomics, semiotics, and the sociobiology of communication systems. Philos Forum XIII(2–3):24–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (1997) Modest witness@second millenium. Femaleman meets oncomouse: feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RG (1907) Observations on the living developing nerve fiber. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 4:140–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich S (2003) Torquing things out: race and classification in Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star’s “Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences”. Sci Technol Hum Values 28(3):435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsman P (1994) Taming the elephant: an orthodox approach to the principle of provenance. In: Swedish National Archives, The Principle of Provenance: report from the first Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, 2–3 September 1993 (Stockholm, 1994), pp 51–63

  • Ilerbaig J (2010) Specimens as records: scientific practice and recordkeeping in natural history research. Am Arch 73:463–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SJ, Ribes D, Buyuktur A, Bowker GC (2011) Collaborative rhythm: temporal dissonance and alignment in collaborative scientific work. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp 245–254

  • Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller EF (1995) Refiguring life: metaphors of twentieth-century biology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervin K, Hedstrom M (2012) How research funding affects data sharing. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work companion, pp 131–134

  • Kuntzman G (2012) NYU loses years of scientific research and thousands of mice to Hurricane Sandy. N.Y. Dly News. http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyu-loses-thousands-mice-sandy-article-1.1194979. Accessed 30 Oct 2012

  • Landecker H (2000) Immortality in vitro: a history of the HeLa cell line. In: Brodwin P (ed) Biotechnology and culture: bodies, anxieties, ethics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker H (2007) Culturing cells: how cells became technologies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1987) Science in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux V (2001) Let the ghosts speak: an empirical exploration of the “nature” of the record. Archivaria 51:81–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw LA (2004) Biotechnology, intellectual property, and the prospects for scientific communication. In: Braman S (ed) Biotechnology and Communication: The Meta-Technologies of Information. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 145–172

  • Lievrouw LA, Livingstone S (2002) Handbook of new media: social shaping and consequences of ICTs. Sage Publications, London, pp 2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock M (2001) The alienation of body tissue and the biopolitics of immortalized cell lines. Body Soc 7(2–3):63–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather JP, Roberts PE (1998) Introduction to cell and tissue culture: theory and technique. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Millerand F, Ribes D, Baker KS, Bowker GC (2012) Making an issue out of a standard: storytelling practices in a scientific community. Sci Technol Hum Values 38(1):7–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA (1978) The identification and monitoring of cell line specificity. In: Barigozzi C (ed) Origin and natural history of cell lines progress in clinical and biological research, vol 26. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 25–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA (2001) Responsibility for truth in research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1410):849–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SJ (2001) Cell culture forensics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(14):7656–7658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry B (2004) Trading the genome: investigating the commodification of bio-information. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul J (1978) Achievement and challenge. In: Barigozzi C (ed) Origin and natural history of cell lines progress in clinical and biological research, vol 26. Alan R. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Moses R (2012) SAA: a glossary of archival and records terminology. The Society of American Archivists. http://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/r/record. Accessed 20 Aug 2013

  • Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS (1949) Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 164(4172):666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radiolab (2010) Famous tumors [Sound recording]. http://www.radiolab.org/2010/may/17/. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • Ribes D, Polk JB (2012) Historical ontology and infrastructure. Proceedings of 2012 iConference, pp 254–262

  • Scherer W, Hoogasian A (1954) Preservation at sub-zero temperatures of strain L and HeLa. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 87:480–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer W, Syverton J, Gey G (1953) Propagation in vitro of poliomyelitis viruses in cultures of human epithelial cells (strain HeLa, Gey) derived from carcinoma of the cervix. Fed Proc 12:457

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar K (2002) Scientists, records, and the practical politics of infrastructure. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

  • Shankar K (2004) Recordkeeping in the production of scientific knowledge: an ethnographic study. Arch Sci 4:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar K (2007) Order from chaos: the poetics and pragmatics of scientific recordkeeping. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58:1457–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skloot R (2010) Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks. Crown Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg CS, Coriell LL, Kniazeff AJ, Shannon JE (1969) The animal cell culture collection. In Vitro 5:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syverton J, Scherer W (1953) Utilization of a stable strain of human epithelial cells (HeLa, Gey) for diagnosis of poliomyelitis. Fed Proc 12:462

    Google Scholar 

  • Trace CB (2002) What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: record keeping in modern organizational culture. Arch Sci 2:137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traweek S (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher E (2004) 23andMe: a genetic social network. Yale Sci. http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/23andme-a-genetic-social-network/. Accessed 30 Oct 2012

  • Wallis JC, Borgman CL, Mayernik M, Pepe A (2008) Moving archival practices upstream: an exploration of the life cycle of ecological sensing data in collaborative field research. Int J Digit Curation 3(1):114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1999) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics; or, control and communication in the animal and the machine. Wiley, New York

  • Witkowski JA (1979) Alexis Carrel and the mysticism of tissue culture. Med Hist 23(3):279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward K (1980) The myths of information: technology and postindustrial culture. Coda Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo G (2007) Concepts of record (1): evidence, information, and persistent representations. Am Arch 70:314–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo G (2008) Concepts of record (2): prototypes and boundary objects. Am Arch 71:118–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Anne J. Gilliland, Leah Lievrouw, and Sharon Traweek for their support in early stages of this work. The author is deeply indebted to Dharma Akmon, Andrew J Lau, and Michael Wartenbe for their insightful feedback, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions on structure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, GSE&IS Building, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Box 951520, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Amelia Acker

Authors
  1. Amelia Acker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Acker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acker, A. How cells became records: standardization and infrastructure in tissue culture. Arch Sci 15, 1–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9213-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation