skip to main content
10.1145/1718918.1718953acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams

Published:06 February 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we examine the characteristics of social activity and patterns of communication on Twitter, a prominent example of the emerging class of communication systems we call "social awareness streams." We use system data and message content from over 350 Twitter users, applying human coding and quantitative analysis to provide a deeper understanding of the activity of individuals on the Twitter network. In particular, we develop a content-based categorization of the type of messages posted by Twitter users, based on which we examine users' activity. Our analysis shows two common types of user behavior in terms of the content of the posted messages, and exposes differences between users in respect to these activities.

References

  1. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM Press (2009), 945--954. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Comp.-Mediated Comm. 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. In Proc. HICSS '09. IEEE Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Huberman, B., Romero, D., and Wu, F. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday {Online} 14, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proc. WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., and Arlitt, M. A few chirps about twitter. In Proc. WOSP '08. ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lampe, C., Ellison, N.B., and Steinfield, C. Changes in use and perception of facebook. In Proc. CSCW '08, ACM Press (2008), 721--730. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sun, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., Lento, T. Gesundheit! Modeling Contagion through Facebook News Feed. In Proc. ICWSM '09, AAAI (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2010
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781605587950
      DOI:10.1145/1718918

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 February 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader