Ischaemic preconditioning in a model of global ischaemia: Infarct size limitation, but no reduction of stunning

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2828(95)90590-1Get rights and content

It is well known that ischaemic preconditioning delays infarct size during regional ischaemic insults. However, the extent of this protective effect against different ischaemia periods has not been established, and any reduction in stunning has been difficult to demonstrate with regional models. In this study we have investigated ischaemic preconditioning in a buffer-perfused isolated rabbit heart model with a global ischaemic insult, and measured both infarct volume and functional recovery. Experiments were performed with three ischaemia time periods of 15, 20 and 30 min at 37°C. Infarct volume (expressed as a percentage of left ventricular volume) was measured by tetrazolium staining after 2 hours reperfusion, and left ventricular developed pressure with an intraventricular balloon. Hearts preconditioned with 5 min ischaemia and 10 min reperfusion were compared with a control group. In this model, preconditioning resulted in a 57% reduction in infarct volume compared with control hearts (P=0.02) subjected to 20 min of global ischaemia, but the degree of this infarct delaying effect was dependent on the ischaemia time and was only 37% (P=0.02) and 11% (n.s.) with a 30 min and 15 min ischaemic challenge respectively. Recovery of post-ischaemic left ventricular developed pressure as a percentage of the pre-ischaemic value correlated very well with infarct volume in control r=−0.82 (P<0.001) and preconditioned r=−0.78 (P<0.001) groups, and the slope of the regression lines was similar for both groups. These results demonstrate that the degree of protection produced by preconditioning is not uniform but varies with the length of the ishaemic insult. By measuring both infarct volume and functional recovery we have been able to confirm that any post-ischaemic improvement in global left ventricular function produced by preconditioning is secondary to reduced infarction, and hence that preconditioning does not attenuate stunning.

References (24)

  • KimH et al.

    Ischaemic preconditioning does not attenuate post-ischaemic reperfusion dysfunction but has an infarct-limiting effect

    Eur Heart J

    (1994)
  • LasleyRD et al.

    Ischaemic and hypoxic preconditioning enhance postischaemic recovery of function in the rat heart

    Cardiovasc Res

    (1993)
  • Cited by (108)

    • Is there an effect of ischemic conditioning on myocardial contractile function following acute myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury?

      2019, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      In isolated papillary muscle, atrial trabeculae, whole heart preparations and in the in vivo setting it is not possible to determine whether improved myocardial contractile function is a direct consequence of ischemic conditioning or due to improved myocardial viability associated with a reduction in I/R injury. For example, a negative correlation between infarct size and postischemic LVDP in a model of global ischemia in isolated perfused rabbit hearts, indicated that the improved LVDP was only due to a reduction in infarct size by ischemic preconditioning and not due to a direct effect on myocardial contractile function [60]. Nonetheless, evidence indicates that there may be direct effects on myocardial contractile function independent of infarct size.

    • Combined morphine and limb remote ischemic perconditioning provides an enhanced protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by antiapoptosis

      2016, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results indicate that the combination of morphine and RIPer may preserve myocardial viability by inhibiting apoptotic cell death, and the antiapoptotic effects by combining the two treatments may be closely associated with the Bcl-2 and Bax expression changes in the myocytes. The infarct size is often regarded as the gold standard when evaluating the strength of different cardioprotective strategies, but the infarct size limitation does not always produce adequate mechanical functional recovery of hearts after IRI [51,52]. Actually, IRI includes various events, such as reperfusion arrhythmias, myocardial stunning, microvascular damage, myocardial hibernation, and a no-reflow phenomenon [53].

    • Pre-treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 protects against ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and stunning without a detected difference in myocardial substrate utilization

      2015, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies have suggested that GLP-1 may activate the same prosurvival kinase pathways recruited by ischemic conditioning phenomena, which in turn mediate their cardioprotective effects via the maintenance of mitochondrial membrane integrity (4–6). However, our data indicate that pre-treatment with GLP-1 protects against both ischemic LV contractile dysfunction and stunning, neither of which are believed to be attenuated by ischemic pre-conditioning when infarct size has been accounted for (30–32). This may therefore argue against the hypothesis that GLP-1 exerts its favorable cardiovascular effects solely as a pre-conditioning mimetic.

    • Rapamycin (Sirolimus): A two-edged sword?

      2006, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text