Relationship between changes in voice pitch and loudness*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80067-5Get rights and content

Summary

Changes in mean fundamental frequency accompanying changes in loudness of phonation are analyzed in 9 professional singers, 9 nonsingers, and 10 male and 10 female patients suffering from vocal functional dysfunction. The subjects read discursive texts with noise in earphones, and some also at voluntarily varied vocal loudness. The healthy subjects phonated as softly and as loudly as possible at various fundamental frequencies throughout their pitch ranges, and the resulting mean phonetograms are compared. Mean pitch was found to increase by about half-semitones per decibel sound level. Grossly, the subject groups gave similar results, although the singers changed voice pitch more than the nonsingers. The voice pitch changes may be explained as passive results of changes of subglottal pressure required for the sound level variation.

References (12)

  • GauffinJ et al.

    Data on the glottal voice source behavior in vowel production

    Speech Trans Lab Quart Prog Status Rept

    (1980)
  • FantG

    Glottal source and excitation and analysis

    Speech Trans Lab Quart Prog Status Rept

    (1971)
  • FantG et al.

    A four-parameter model of glottal flow

    Speech Trans Lab Quart Prog Status Rept

    (1985)
  • LaneH et al.

    The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech

    J Speech Hear Res

    (1971)
  • SchutteHK et al.

    Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardizing voice area measurement/phonetography

    Folia Phoniatr

    (1983)
  • PerkinsWH et al.

    Effects of high-frequency feedback and noise on phonation as analyzed by long-term-average spectra

    Speech Trans Lab Quart Prog Status Rept

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (142)

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

This is a revised version of a paper presented at The Voice Foundation's Sixteenth Symposium, “Care of the Professional Voice,” New York, June 1987.

View full text