Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter September 1, 2020

Osteopathic Medicine and the Osteoporosis Management Gap

  • Jonathan W. Lowery , Jana Baker , Garren P. Gebhardt , Sherman Gorbis , Adam Hoehn , Julia M. Hum , Luke Nelligan , Don Sefcik , Bryan Wacker , Angela Wagner , David Williams and Amanda Wright

To the Editor:

Osteoporosis diagnosis is declining and hip fracture rates, which were tracking downward, have leveled off in the United States.1 These are significant trends as osteoporotic fractures are associated with reduced quality of life, impaired mobility, and increased mortality.2 Moreover, fewer than 20% of patients who sustain a fragility fracture receive drug therapy to reduce the risk of a subsequent fracture.3 This alarming treatment gap has led the establishment of a coalition of stakeholder organizations (led by the American Society for Bone & Mineral Research and the Center for Medical Technology Policy) charged with developing consensus regarding osteoporosis management. The coalition produced clinical recommendations aimed at preventing secondary fractures among patients aged 65 years or older with a prior hip or vertebral fracture.4 These 13 recommendations address comprehensive management of osteoporosis, including assessing and reducing fall risk, prescribing appropriate pharmacotherapy, and improving patient education about the benefits of treatment and risks associated with the lack thereof.

The coalition's recommendations reinforce the fact that primary care providers are on the front line of osteoporosis care. In the US, nearly 50% of osteopathic physicians (DOs) practice in family medicine or internal medicine and, in 2019, DOs matched into more than 31% and 17% of all first-year residency slots in family medicine and internal medicine, respectively.5-7 Moreover, DOs are particularly well-suited to lead the charge in comprehensive management of osteoporosis in the US health care system. For instance, osteopathic manipulative treatment improves balance and reduces fall risk,8-10 which aligns with the coalition's recommendation to “consider… evaluation and intervention to improve impairments in mobility, gait and balance…”.4 This is reminiscent of recommendations that appeared in The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association in 2013, encouraging geriatricians to use osteopathic manipulative treatment to “identify posture and gait abnormalities that contribute to gait and balance disorders.”11 Additionally, the osteopathic philosophy's emphasis on preventive care aligns with the coalition's recommendation to “counsel [patients] not to smoke or use tobacco… limit alcohol intake… [and to] exercise regularly, including weight-bearing, muscle strengthening, and balance and postural exercises.”4

DOs must be champions in the fight to close the osteoporosis management gap and reduce the negative impact of this chronic disease.


Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
Bone & Mineral Research Group, Marian University, Indianapolis, Indiana

References

1. LewieckiEM, WrightNC, CurtisJR, et al.. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015.Osteoporos Int.2018;29(3):717-722. doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. CauleyJA.Public health impact of osteoporosis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(10):1243-1251. doi:10.1093/gerona/glt093Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. KanisJA, SvedbomA, HarveyN, McCloskeyEV.The osteoporosis treatment gap. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(9):1926-1928. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2301Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. ConleyRB, AdibG, AdlerRA, et al.. Secondary fracture prevention: consensus clinical recommendations from a multistakeholder coalition. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(1):36-52. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3877Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Final DO Match Day produces 506 primary care residents. American Osteopathic Association; 2019. https://osteopathic.org/2019/02/04/final-do-match-day-produces-506-primary-care-residents/. Accessed November 6, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

6. Results and Data 2019 Main Residency Match. National Residency Matching Program; 2019. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NRMP-Results-and-Data-2019_04112019_final.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

7. Osteopathic Medical Profession Report. American Osteopathic Association; 2018. https://osteopathic.org/wp-content/uploads/2018-OMP-Report.pdf. Accessed November 6, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

8. FraixM.Osteopathic manipulative treatment and vertigo: a pilot study. PM R. 2010;2(7):612-618. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. LopezD, KingHH, KneblJA, KosmopoulosV, CollinsD, PattersonRM.Effects of comprehensive osteopathic manipulative treatment on balance in elderly patients: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(6):382-388. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2011.111.6.382Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. WellsMR, GiantinotoS, D'AgateD, et al.. Standard osteopathic manipulative treatment acutely improves gait performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999;99(2):92-98. doi:10.7556/jaoa.1999.99.2.92Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. NollDR, ChannellMK, BasehorePM, et al.. Developing osteopathic competencies in geriatrics for medical students. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(4):276-289.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-01
Published in Print: 2020-09-01

© 2020 American Osteopathic Association

Downloaded on 4.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2020.092/html
Scroll to top button