Open Access, Peer-reviewed
eISSN 2288-338X
    Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016 Apr;28(2):169-179. Korean.
    Published online May 04, 2016.
    https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2016.28.2.169
    © 2016 Korean Society of Adult Nursing
    Original Article

    Effects of Simulation-based Training for Basic Life Support Utilizing Video-assisted Debriefing on Non-Technical and Technical Skills of Nursing Students

    Jin Hwa Koh,1 and Hea Kung Hur2
      • 1Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
      • 2Department of Nursing, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
    • Corresponding author: Hur, Hea Kung. Department of Nursing, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 26426, Korea. Tel: +82-33-741-0384, Fax: +82-33743-9490, Email: hhk0384@yonsei.ac.kr
    Received February 01, 2016; Revised April 04, 2016; Accepted April 18, 2016.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of simulation-based training (SBT) for basic life support (BLS) utilizing video-assisted debriefing (VAD) about non-technical skills (NTSs) and technical skills (TSs). The goal of the proposed study is the evaluation of a teaching method about the correct application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

    Methods

    The study design was a control group pre- and post-test non-synchronized experimental design. The sample included twelve teams of 36 nursing students. Both the experimental and the control groups received the SBT for BLS. Only the experimental groups received VAD where as the control groups had a verbal debriefing. Raters who used checklists for TSs and NTSs evaluated both groups. Data were analyzed by the SPSS 20.0 using Cronbach's α, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Mann-Whitney U test and Willcoxon signed rank test.

    Results

    The experimental groups scored higher than the control groups in both TSs (p=.004) and the NTSs (p=.008).

    Conclusion

    The findings of this study suggest that NTSs are an important factor that lead CPR successfully, so VAD can be used as an efficient teaching-learning strategy in the SBT for BLS for nursing students and nurses.

    Keywords
    Video-assisted debriefing; Simulation-based training for basic life support; Non-technical skills; Technical skills

    Figures

    Figure 1
    Flow chart of study process.

    Tables

    Table 1
    Homogeneity Test of Dependent Variables

    Table 2
    Effects of Basic Life Support Simulation Training Using Video-assisted Debriefing on Non-technical Skills (N=12)

    Table 3
    Effects of Basic Life Support Simulation Training Using Video-assisted Debriefing on Technical Skills (N=12)

    Notes

    This manuscript is a revision of the first author' master's thesis from Yonsei University.

    References

      1. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J. Effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients in Sweden. Resuscitation 2000;47:59–70. [doi: 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00199-4]
      1. Kim DH, Lee YJ, Hwang MS, Park JH, Kim HS, Cha HG. Effects of a simulation-based integrated clinical practice program (SICPP) on the problem solving process, Clinical competence and critical thinking in a nursing student. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2012;18(3):499–509.
      1. Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Hemphill R, et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010;122 18 Suppl 3:S640–S656.
      1. Korea Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Common cardiopulmonary resuscitation guideline development and distribution [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; 2011 [cited 2015 January 1].
        Available from: http://www.kacpr.org/popup/file/2011_guidelines.pdf.
      1. Flowerdew L, Brown R, Vincent C, Woloshynowych M. Development and validation of a tool to assess emergency physicians' non-technical skills. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2012;59(5):376–385.e4.
      1. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality. Strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety [Internet]. U.S.: Department of Health and Human Services; 2009 [cited 2015 January 1].
        Available from: http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov/index.htm accessed April 2011.
      1. Cooper S, Cant R, Porter J, Missen K, Sparkes L, McConnell-Henry T, et al. Managing patient deterioration: assessing teamwork and individual performance. Emerg Med J 2013;30(5):377–381. [doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201312]
      1. Walker S, Brett S, McKay A, Lambdend S, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Observational Skill-based Clinical Assessment tool for Resuscitation (OSCAR): development and validation. Resuscitation 2011;82:835–844. [doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.009]
      1. Andersen PO, Jensen MK, Lippert A, Østergaard D, Klausenb TW. Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams. Resuscitation 2010;81:703–711. [doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.034]
      1. Judy JR, Catherine B. Facilitated debriefing. In: Wendy MN, Felissa RL, editors. High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2008. pp. 369-385.
      1. Scherer LA, Chang MC, Meredith JW, Battistella FD. Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg 2003;185(6):516–520. [doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00062-X]
      1. Boet S, Bould D, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crisis. Crit Care Med 2011;39(6):1377–1381. [doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eb8be]
      1. Sanborn DE, Pyke HF, Sanborn CJ. Videotape playback and psychotherapy: a review. Psychotherapy 1975;12(2):179–186. [doi: 10.1037/h0086424]
      1. Rogers A. Videotape feedback in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 1985;5:37–39. [doi: 10.1037/h0088647]
      1. Newby T, Stepich D, Lehman J, Russell J. In: Instructional technology for teaching and learning. USA: Prentice-Hall Inc; 2000.
      1. Park IH. In: The effects of video-aided feedback in pre and post operative nursing simulation practice. [master's thesis]. Asan: Soonchunhyang University; 2013.
      1. Kim JY. In: Development of a scenario of simulation and analysis of the effect of debriefing. [master's thesis]. Sungnam: Eulji University; 2012.
      1. Grant J, Moss J, Epps C, Watts P. Using video-facilitated feedback to improve student performance following high-fidelity simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2010;6(5):e177–e184. [doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.09.001]
      1. Roh YS, Kelly M, Ha EH. Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students. Nurs Health Sci 2016;18(2):238–245. [doi: 10.1111/nhs.12259]
      1. Nadler I, Sanderson PM, Van Dyken C, Davis PG, Liley HG. Presenting video recordings of newborn resuscitation in debriefings for teamwork training. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20(2):163, 169. [doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.043547]
      1. Cooper S S, Bogossian FE. In: Managing patient deterioration: enhancing nurses' competence through face-to-face and web based simulation techniques. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Victoria; 2013.
      1. Luctkar-Flude M, Baker C, Pulling C, Mcgraw R, Dagnone D, Medves J, et al. Evaluating an undergraduate interprofessional simulation based educational module: communication, teamwork, and confidence performing cardiac resuscitation skills. Adv Med Educ Pract 2010;1:59–66. [doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S14100]
      1. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Singh P, Srisatkunam T, Twaij A, Darzi A. Ward simulation to improve surgical ward round performance. Ann Surg 2014;260(2):236–243. [doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000557]
      1. Jung JS, Hur HK. Effectiveness and retention of repeated simulation-based basic life support training for nursing students. J Korean Crit Care Nurs 2013;6(2):24–36.
      1. Richard HR. Korean Society for Simulation in Healthcare, translator. In: Manual of simulation in healthcare. Seoul: Yedang; 2010.
      1. Dufrene C, Young A. Successful debriefing-best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: a literature review. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34(3):372–376. [doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.026]
      1. Bowden T, Rowlands A, Buckwell M, Abbott S. Web-based video and feedback in the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurse Educ Today 2011;32(4):443–447. [doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.003]
      1. Kardong-Edgren SE, Starkweather AR, Ward LD. The integration of simulation into a clinical foundations of nursing course: student and faculty perspectives. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2008;5:Article26. [doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1603]
      1. Kim JR. English teaching and learning model development using interactive white boards. Korean J Teach Educ 2009;25(1):109–141.
      1. Andersen PO, Jensen MK, Lippert A, Osterggard D. Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams. Resuscitation 2010;81:695–702. [doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.024]
    Cited by
    Crossref 3
    Google Scholar 
    MeSH Terms
    Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Checklist
    Humans
    Nursing*
    Research Design
    Students, Nursing*
    Teaching
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide

    1 / 1

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    PERMALINK