Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T20:06:40.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kangaroo harvesters and the euthanasia of orphaned young-at-foot: applying the theory of planned behaviour to an animal welfare issue

Part of: AWF Wild Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

TM Sharp  and
SR McLeod
TM Sharp*
Affiliation:
Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station, Centre of Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
SR McLeod
Affiliation:
Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, Forest Road, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange NSW 2800, Australia
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: trudy.sharp@student.unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When female kangaroos are shot during commercial harvesting, it is a requirement that dependent young-at-foot are euthanased. However, there are anecdotal reports that harvesters either cannot euthanase young-at-foot (eg they do not see them or they flee) or will not (eg they do not think it is necessary). In this study we used the theory of planned behaviour to understand the beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of kangaroo harvesters with regards to the euthanasia of young-at-foot. We firstly conducted a survey of a small number of kangaroo harvesters (n = 21) to gather information to develop the main questionnaire. Recruitment of participants was conducted using a number of approaches including a mail out of over 600 pen-and-paper questionnaires to harvesters in NSW, QLD and SA, Australia. We received completed questionnaires from 65 harvesters. Behaviour was directly observed in only 14 harvesters. The results indicated that those kangaroo harvesters with a more favourable attitude towards euthanasing young-at-foot and who feel more social pressure to do so are more likely to intend to euthanase young-at-foot. However, intention to euthanase orphaned young-at-foot only rarely translated into actual behaviour. The participating harvesters believe that euthanasing young-at-foot reduces joey suffering; that government kangaroo management agencies and farmers and graziers approve of them doing it (but animal protection groups do not); and that the greatest limiting factor preventing them from euthanasing young at-foot is that they escape. This research revealed deficiencies in knowledge and training of kangaroo harvesters with regard to humane harvesting practices. We conclude that the use of social psychology methodology and frameworks, such as the theory of planned behaviour, can provide a detailed insight into human attitudes and behaviours that affect animal welfare. This approach can reveal the most important specific factors to consider when training and educating personnel who have direct responsibility for the humane treatment of animals.

Keywords

animal welfareattitudescommercial harvestingkangaroosocial psychologytheory of planned behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 39 - 54
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I 1991 The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I and Fishbein, M 1980 Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
Armitage, CJ 2005 Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychology 24: 235–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armitage, CJ and Conner, M 2001 Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 471–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnholt, AT and Arnholt, MAT 2012 Package ‘BSDA’, R Package version 1.01. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BSDA/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ami, D 2009 A shot in the dark: A report on kangaroo harvesting. Animal Liberation: NSW, Australia. http://www.wildlifeadvo-cate.com/pdf/a_shot_in_the_dark.pdfGoogle Scholar
Breuer, K, Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL, Matthews, LR and Coleman, GJ 2000 Behavioural response to humans and the pro-ductivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 273–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briggs, SR and Cheek, JM 1986 The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality 54: 106–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, G, Rice, M and Hemsworth, P 2012 Human-animal relationships at sheep and cattle abattoirs. Animal Welfare 21: 15–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hemsworth, PH and Hay, M 1998 Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs from attitudinal and job-related variables and empathy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58:63–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01168-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hemsworth, PH, Hay, M and Cox, M 2000 Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, McGregor, M, Hemsworth, PH, Boyce, J and Dowling, S 2003 The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 189–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00057-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia 2008 National Code of Practice for the Humane Shooting of Kangaroos and Wallabies for Commercial Purposes. Australian Government: Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Conner, M and Armitage, CJ 1998 Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 1429–1464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, MA and Armitage, CJ 2009 Promoting drivers’ compli-ance with speed limits: Testing an intervention based on the the-ory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Psychology 100: 111–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712608X318626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A and Lang, A-G 2009 Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41: 1149–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishbein, M and Ajzen, I 2010 Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Francis, J, Eccles, MP, Johnston, M, Walker, AE, Grimshaw, JM, Foy, R, Kaner, EFS, Smith, L and Bonetti, D 2004 Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
Frith, H and Sharman, G 1964 Breeding in wild populations of the Red Kangaroo, Megaleia rufa. CSIRO Wildlife Research 9: 86–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CWR9640086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, RB, McLeod, SR and Druhan, JP 2003 Evaluating Alternative Management Strategies for Kangaroos in the Murray-Darling Basin: Final Report. Murray-Darling Basin Commission: Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL and Coleman, GJ 2009 The integration of human-animal relations into animal welfare monitoring schemes. Animal Welfare 18: 335–345Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL, Coleman, GJ and Hansen, C 1989 A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 301–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90099-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH and Coleman, GJ 1998 Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ and Barnett, JL 1994 Improving the attitude and behavior of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behavior and reproductive-per-formance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39:349–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90168-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, HA 2007 Gender differences in human–animal interactions: a review. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals 20: 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, HA undated Animal Attitudes Scale. http://paws.wcu.edu/herzog/AnimalAttScale.pdfGoogle Scholar
Herzog, HA, Betchart, NS and Pittman, RB 1991 Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoös: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals 4: 184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrubes, D, Ajzen, I and Daigle, J 2001 Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Leisure Sciences 23: 165–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, SR and Sharp, TM 2014 Improving the humaneness of com-mercial kangaroo harvesting. Final report for RIRDC Project No PRJ-004103. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT, Australia. https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/13-116Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Diesch, TJ and Johnson, CB 2010 Should mam-malian fetuses be excluded from regulations protecting animals during experiments? ALTEX 27 (Special Issue): 199-202Google Scholar
Norman, P, Conner, M and Bell, R 1999 The Theory of Planned Behavior and smoking cessation. Health Psychology 18: 89–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Office of Environment and Heritage 2012 Annual Report for the New South Wales Commercial Kangaroo Harvest Management Plan 2012-2016. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/wildlifeman-agement/KMPAnnualReport2012.htmGoogle Scholar
Office of Environment and Heritage 2013 Annual Report for the New South Wales Commercial Kangaroo Harvest Management Plan 2012-2016. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/wildlifeman-agement/KMPAnnualReport2012.htmGoogle Scholar
Pople, AR 1996 Effects of harvesting upon the demography of red kangaroos in western Queensland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Queensland, QLD, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
RSPCA Australia 1985 Incidence of Cruelty to Kangaroos : A report to the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service. RSPCA Australia: Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
RSPCA Australia 2002 Kangaroo Shooting Code Compliance: A survey of the extent of compliance with the requirements of the Code of Practice. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/publications/kangaroo-report/Google Scholar
Schifter, DE and Ajzen, I 1985 Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Personality 49: 843–851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843Google ScholarPubMed
Sharp, T 2007 Walking the dog: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Unpublished honours thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, SK, Burns, RC, Pierskalla, CD and Selin, S 2012 Predicting deer hunting intentions using the Theory of Planned Behavior: a survey of Oregon big game hunters. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17: 129–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.649885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signal, TD and Taylor, N 2006a Attitudes to animals: demo-graphics within a community sample. Society & Animals 14: 147–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853006776778743Google Scholar
Signal, TD and Taylor, N 2006b Attitudes to animals in the animal pro-tection community compared to a normative community sample. Society & Animals 14: 265–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853006778149181Google Scholar
Tabachnick, BG and Fidell, LS 2007 Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon: Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Coleman, G 2002 The relation-ship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 195–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willcox, AS, Giuliano, WM and Monroe, MC 2012 Predicting cattle rancher wildlife management activities: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17:159–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.639043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M 1999 The Kangaroo Betrayed: World's Largest Wildlife Slaughter, Second Edition. Australian Wildlife Protection Council: Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaGoogle Scholar