本研究旨在探討有效生態管理與企業價值之關聯性,以2015年至2017年上市櫃製造業為樣本。本研究是以環境認證、環境管理、環境績效三面向評分量表之結果衡量企業實施生態效益管理之狀況,其環境認證、環境管理、環境績效之資料皆採內容分析法由企業社會責任報告書所獲得,其餘財務資料則取自台灣經濟新報社(TEJ)。本研究是以Ohlson模型進行分析,根據結果顯示,環境認證、環境績效與企業價值間皆呈負相關;而環境管理則由因素分析拆解為兩方面-實質管理與教育訓練,環境實質管理對企業價值呈現顯著之負向關聯性,而組織教育訓練與企業價值的關聯性則為不顯著。因此,依據此實證研究結果,投資人對於企業積極的付諸行動實施生態效益管理,以較為負面的態度回應企業,所以未來企業在進行與環境維護之相關規劃時,需考量投資人對於決策之觀感,並加以評估其效益,注意環境維護與支出成本之間的平衡。
Using the examples of publicly listed manufacturing companies in Taiwan during 2015 to 2017, this paper investigates the relationships between effective ecological management and enterprise value. The efficacy of enterprise implementation of ecological management is evaluated in this work by the rating scales of environmental certification, environmental management, and environmental performance. The information of environmental certification, environmental management and environmental performance all are obtained from social responsibility report by content analytical method, and other financial data are acquired from TEJ database. The Ohlson model is used to analyze data and empirical results shows that the relationship between environmental certification, environmental performance, and enterprise value appears a significant negative effect. While it has divided the environmental management into two parts–substantial management and educational training by factor analysis. With enterprise value, the substantial management is a significant negative correlate and the educational training lack significant. According to the results in the work, upon implementing effective ecological management with positive action, enterprise will face the negative impressions from investors. Therefore, if companies are planning related to environmental maintenance, it should to consider the investors' perception, evaluate the benefits for enterprise and pay attention to the balance between environmental maintenance and cost of expenditures.