After the legalization of the “zero corporal punishment” policy, there are more constraints for teachers in disciplining students. While disciplining students, teachers are more likely to break the law now. However, if teachers don’t do their duty of disciplining students, they might be labeled as “incompetent teachers”. Facing the above dilemma, teachers must learn how to discipline students cautiously and appropriately. Thus this study aims to investigate the impacts of the legalization of the “zero corporal punishment” policy. Interviews were used as research method. There are nine educational administration districts in Taipei County. One junior high school teacher and one elementary school teacher were selected for interviews separately from each district. In addition, some counseling teachers, parents and students were selected as respondents in order to develop a more comprehensive understanding. For the present, most teachers agree on the spirit of the “zero corporal punishment” policy. Nevertheless, they argue that there are some problems. First, the definition of corporal punishment is imprecise. Second, parents are not legally obligated to coordinate. Third, the counseling teachers are insufficient. Finally and the most importantly, no alternative approach is provided when teachers fail to effectively discipline students. In order to solve the foregoing problems, some recommendations are proposed as follows: 1.The recommendations in terms of disciplining and guiding strategy: (1)Establish good teacher-student relationship. (2)Establish good teacher-parents relationship. (3)Enhance teachers’ professional knowledge and skills in guiding and disciplining. (4)Request timely assistance whenever teachers feel necessary. 2.The recommendations in terms of human resource: Employ full-time counseling teachers, psychotherapists and social workers at schools. 3. The recommendations in terms of teacher education program and school curriculum: (1)Provide more practical teacher education programs. (2)Review the curriculum of Integrative Activities. 4.The recommendations in terms of legislation: (1)Clarify the definition of corporal punishment by analyzing cases in the Teacher Performance Appraisal Committee, the Teachers' Appeal Review Committee and the Courts. (2)Respect the decision of the Teacher Performance Appraisal Committee. (3)Put the “The Rules Mentioned for Teachers Guiding and Disciplining Students” on a legal basis. (4)Legalize parents’ obligations and impose penalties for violations by amending the “Family Education Law”. 5. The recommendations in terms of the system: (1)Reduce class size. (2)Establish the Counseling and Consulting Committee in each educational administration district. (3)Implement the “zero tolerance” policy along with the “zero corporal punishment” policy simultaneously.