Experimental In-Vivo Models Used in Fat Grafting Research for Volume Augmentation in Soft Tissue Reconstruction

 

 Permissions and Reprints

As the popularity of fat grafting research increases, animal models are being used as the source of pre-clinical experimental information for discovery and to enhance techniques. To date, animal models used in this research have not been compared to provide a standardized model. We analyzed publications from 1968–2015 to compare published accounts of animal models in fat grafting research. Data collected included: species used, graft characteristics (donor tissue, recipient area, amount injected, injection technique), time of sacrifice and quantification methods. Mice were most commonly used (56% of studies), with the “athymic nude” strain utilized most frequently (44%). Autologous fat was the most common source of grafted tissue (52%). Subcutaneous dorsum was the most common recipient site (51%). On average, 0.80±0.60 mL of fat was grafted. A single bolus technique was used in 57% of studies. Fat volume assessment was typically completed at the end of the study, occurring at less than 1 week to one year. Graft volume was quantified by weight (63%), usually in conjunction with another analysis. The results demonstrate the current heterogeneity of animal models in this research. We propose that the research community reach a consensus to allow better comparison of techniques and results. One example is the model used in our laboratory and others; this model is described in detail. Eventually, larger animal models may better translate to the human condition but, given increased financial costs and animal facility capability, should be explored when data obtained from small animal studies is exhausted or inconclusive.

Publication History

Received: 10 March 2017

Accepted: 26 April 2017

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2017. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Mazzola RF, Mazzola IC. History of fat grafting: from ram fat to stem cells. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 147-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H. et al. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 211-28
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Piccolo NS, Piccolo MS, Piccolo MT. Fat grafting for treatment of burns, burn scars, and other difficult wounds. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 263-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Petit JY, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N. et al. Safety of Lipofilling in Patients with Breast Cancer. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 339-44
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kronowitz SJ, Mandujano CC, Liu J. et al. Lipofilling of the breast does not increase the risk of recurrence of breast cancer: a matched controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 385-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lin JY, Wang C, Pu LL. Can we standardize the techniques for fat grafting?. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 199-208
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Longaker MT, Aston SJ, Baker DC. et al. Fat transfer in 2014: what we do not know. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 1305-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Pu LL, Yoshimura K, Coleman SR. Future perspectives of fat grafting. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42: 389-94
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2014 National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Plastic Surgeons; 2014 [cited 2017 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. et al. Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the american society of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 35-46
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Grisolia S. Letter: Hypoxia, saffron, and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 1974; 2: 41-2
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Benavides F, Oberyszyn TM, VanBuskirk AM. et al. The hairless mouse in skin research. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 53: 10-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC. et al. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001; 9: 66-76
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Jemec B. Pre-operative traumatic congestion and composite skin-fat grafting. An experimental study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 2: 91-6
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Contreras GA, Lee YH, Mottillo EP. et al. Inducible brown adipocytes in subcutaneous inguinal white fat: the role of continuous sympathetic stimulation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2014; 307: E793-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rosenwald M, Perdikari A, Rulicke T. et al. Bi-directional interconversion of brite and white adipocytes. Nat Cell Biol 2013; 15: 659-67
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Tervala TV, Gronroos TJ, Hartiala P. et al. Analysis of fat graft metabolic adaptation and vascularization using positron emission tomography-computed tomographic imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 291-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Dillerud E, Heden P. Circulation of blood and viability after blunt suction lipectomy in pig buttock flaps. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1993; 27: 9-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lequeux C, Oni G, Wong C. et al. Subcutaneous fat tissue engineering using autologous adipose-derived stem cells seeded onto a collagen scaffold. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 1208-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Chung CR, Tsuji K, Nifuji A. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of tooth, calvaria and mechanical stress-induced tooth movement in adult Runx2/Cbfa1 heterozygous knock-out mice. J Med Dent Sci 2004; 51: 105-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ullmann Y, Shoshani O, Fodor A. et al. Searching for the favorable donor site for fat injection: in vivo study using the nude mice model. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 1304-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Thanik VD, Chang CC, Lerman OZ. et al. A murine model for studying diffusely injected human fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 74-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Khouri Jr RK, Khouri RE, Lujan-Hernandez JR. et al. Diffusion and perfusion: the keys to fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014; 2: e220
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Atashroo Jr DA, Paik KJ, Chung MT. et al. Assessment of viability of human fat injection into nude mice with microcomputed tomography. J Vis Exp 2015; e52217
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kononas TC, Bucky LP, Hurley C. et al. The fate of suctioned and surgically removed fat after reimplantation for soft-tissue augmentation: a volumetric and histologic study in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 763-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Por YC, Yeow VK, Louri N. et al. Platelet-rich plasma has no effect on increasing free fat graft survival in the nude mouse. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1030-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Fisher C, Grahovac TL, Schafer ME. et al. Comparison of harvest and processing techniques for fat grafting and adipose stem cell isolation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 351-61
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Eto H, Kato H, Suga H. et al. The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 1081-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar