Through Knee Amputation: Technique Modifications and Surgical Outcomes

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background Knee disarticulations (KD) are most commonly employed following trauma or tumor resection but represent less than 2% of all lower extremity amputations performed in the United States annually. KDs provide enhanced proprioception, a long lever arm, preservation of adductor muscle insertion, decreased metabolic cost of ambulation, and an end weight-bearing stump. The role for KDs in the setting of arterial insufficiency or overwhelming infection is less clear. The purpose of this study is to describe technique modifications and report surgical outcomes following KDs at a high-volume Limb Salvage Center.

Methods A retrospective study of medical records for all patients who underwent a through-knee amputation performed by the senior author (C.E.A.) between 2004 and 2012 was completed. Medical records were reviewed to collect demographic, operative, and postoperative information for each of the patients identified.

Results Between 2004 and 2012, 46 through-knee amputations for 41 patients were performed. The mean patient age was 68 and indications for surgery included infection (56%), arterial thrombosis (35%), and trauma (9%). Postoperative complications included superficial cellulitis (13%), soft tissue infection (4%), and flap ischemia (4%) necessitating one case of surgical debridement (4%) and four trans-femoral amputations (9%). 9 (22%) patients went on to ambulate. Postoperative ambulation was greatest in the traumatic cohort and for patients less than 50 years of age, P<0.05. Alternatively, diabetes mellitus and infection reduced the likelihood of postoperative ambulation, P<0.01.

Conclusions Knee disarticulations are a safe and effective alternative to other lower extremity amputations when clinically feasible. For patient unlikely to ambulate, a through-knee amputation maximizes ease of transfers, promotes mobility by providing a counterbalance, and eliminates the potential for knee flexion contracture with subsequent skin breakdown.

Publication History

Received: 01 May 2014

Accepted: 20 August 2014

Article published online:
05 May 2022

© 2014. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Behr J, Friedly J, Molton I. et al. Pain and pain-related interference in adults with lower-limb amputation: comparison of knee-disarticulation, transtibial, and transfemoral surgical sites. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46: 963-972
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kulkarni J, Pande S, Morris J. Survival rates in dysvascular lower limb amputees. Int J Surg 2006; 4: 217-221
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sansam K, Neumann V, O'Connor R. et al. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 593-603
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I. et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 961-972
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Krajbich JI. Lower-limb deficiencies and amputations in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6: 358-367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ten Duis K, Bosmans JC, Voesten HG. et al. Knee disarticulation: survival, wound healing and ambulation. A historic cohort study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 52-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Pinzur MS, Gold J, Schwartz D. et al. Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation. Orthopedics 1992; 15: 1033-1036
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Gailey RS, Wenger MA, Raya M. et al. Energy expenditure of trans-tibial amputees during ambulation at self-selected pace. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 84-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Morse BC, Cull DL, Kalbaugh C. et al. Through-knee amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a review of 50 cases. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 638-643
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Borkosky SL, Roukis TS. Incidence of re-amputation following partial first ray amputation associated with diabetes mellitus and peripheral sensory neuropathy: a systematic review. Diabet Foot Ankle 2012; 3: 12169
  Google Scholar
• 11 Attinger CE, Brown BJ. Amputation and ambulation in diabetic patients: function is the goal. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012; 28 (Suppl 1) 93-96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Evans KK, Attinger CE, Al-Attar A. et al. The importance of limb preservation in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications 2011; 25: 227-231
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Taylor SM, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW. et al. Preoperative clinical factors predict postoperative functional outcomes after major lower limb amputation: an analysis of 553 consecutive patients. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 227-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Fisher Jr DF, Clagett GP, Fry RE. et al. One-stage versus two-stage amputation for wet gangrene of the lower extremity: a randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1988; 8: 428-433
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Nellis N, Van De Water JM. Through-the-knee amputation: an improved technique. Am Surg 2002; 68: 466-469
  Google Scholar